Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry

You continue to overlook culture as an economic factor. An example of ths was when a Swedish economist was visiting the US in the company of Milton Friedman. The Swede mentioned how there was no poverty among Swedes in Sweden and Friedman responded that there was no poverty among Swedes in Minnesota either.

The licensing department only licenses and has no means of inspection. The clients who visit the barber shop would know soon enough if the conditions are as you describe, and would not return. The owner would quickly go out of business.When you meet with unsatisfactory service or dirty conditions you'd not like call the licensing dept.

Here's what Trump said. "‘Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing".

It's odd that some citizens still bring that up while ignoring the underlying fact of Hillary's 30,000 missing emails. Why no concern about her clearly illegal activities? Attention should be focused where it properly belongs.

 

Trump attempted to denigrate and fire Mueller and make false statements about him as a child would do. Mueller was commissioned to uncover Russian interference in our election. Anything else that he found was passed on the other jurisdictions. Even Barr found that the report did not exonerate Trump. Why we are discussing this is nuts, because Trump is a corrupt person who thinks that it is ok to grab a woman by the shmusky.

 

Thanks for the input. None of 'em were making a farce of our democracy or turn
it into an autocracy.

 

They are using their oversight authority to find the truth, as it should be.

 

Perhaps we should call the entire "investigation" the Mueller Putsch?

 

Because there wasn't any. Obstruction of justice would be deliberately destroying 30,000 subpoenad emails.

 

What the Deep State tried to do was.

 

"Oversight"

"to find the truth"

LMAO ~ Aren't you cute....

 

Although I agree with your comment, I did not notice any mention of Trump being a brilliant anything, especially a brilliant Russian secret agent. As far as the moron portion goes.........

 

Mueller explains that the motivation must be to hurt the investigation and Bob explains that there are other very real motivations for DT's actions. Without proving motivation there is no obstruction. For example, Mueller had conflicts of interest and hired a slew of anti-Trump Dems to conduct the investigation. Those are valid reasons for his firing and if those were motivations then there was no obstruction. On top of that to suggest impeachment based upon something that never even happened just comes across as vindictive, malicious and petty. And sadly this appears the best they've got (which amounts to nothing).

 

Horsepucky

 

I guess that makes Hillary a sub-moron.

 

And even if Mueller was removed it wouldn't have stopped the investigation, someone else would have been appointed, by Rosenstein.

 

If Trump attempted to fire mules he would have been fired. This is the dumbest argument you make, it can't possible be factually true. Trump could've fired Mules at an step of the way without reason, if he wanted him fired it's a phone call a way. Dumber than dumb argument since he wasn't fired.

 

Uh My...you're one of those.

Have A Nice Day

tecoyah backs away slowly....

 

They do not want that discussed. nor that Russia helped her with that paid for report.

 

....or that immediately after Trump was elected, they organized anti-Trump demonstrations.

 

I read this fake claim by Democrats quite often. Must be an instruction in the resistance manual.

 

I showed them photos of the resistance and it was prior to Trump lifting a finger.

 

So you "know" Trump has not committed obstruction of justice just as you "know" Clinton did. LOL!

I avoid hypocrisy by trying to apply exactly the same standard regardless of person, party, or desired outcome. Apparently not everyone feels that is important.

 

Sure avoid hypocrisy by seeking this from Lynch, Holder, Comey, Lerner and more.

 

That's not so.

This error leads from your lack of knowledge demonstrated above,

It was not his job to exonerate anyone.

Congress can question someone under oath but they cannot indict. Hillary Clinton, among many others, may still be charged, depending on the decision of the DOJ.

 

More importantly, Mueller knows Trump did not 'collude' or obstruct justice, otherwise he would have been indicted.

 

I respect that, but disagree. There might be a few examples where socialism works better than capitalism, but IMO they are few and far between. Direct redistribution of wealth sounds good but never ever achieves its stated goals. There is also a wealth of confusion between socialism and socialistic programs provided by the government. Socialism is government ownership and control of production and distribution. Police and fire departments are not, as many claim, socialism, for instance. Socialism at the local level has survived with things such as garbage collection and electric power, though they have not done any better than private ownership.

 

So is the AG.