Hillary Clinton to give keynote speech at cyber security summit

Please tell me this is a joke. What? It's not a joke?

This is a women who used an unsecure private server for top secret information and then when exposed, deleted tens of thousands of Emails, destroyed the server, and smashed numerous electronic devices with a hammer.

Below is her PowerPoint slide that she is going to use for her keynote speech that was leaked by an unnamed unidentified anonymous source...

How to get away with a cyber crime

• Install private unsecure server
• Keep all classified material on private unsecure server
• If exposed, Use BleachBit to Delete all classified material from private unsecure server
• Smash all electronic devices with hammer
• Conclusion: When asked "Did you wipe your email server?" respond by saying "Like with a cloth or something

​

 

I think the Onion did this, and now real life does it.

 

In school, the popular kids used to invite someone who was UNpopular to parties, making them think that they'd finally be accepted only to either mock them or treat them as jokes for their amusement. I'm kinda thinking that these techies are doing the same thing to The Cellulite Goddess.

"Yeah, we're able to wipe entire servers now in mere picoseconds with the Q-B86 Drive Reformatter - works much faster than a cloth or something, Mrs. Clinton!"

 

I laughed at all the comments about it on this stupid company's Twitter feed.

 

This is like Ted Bundy giving a speech at a conference for feminists.

 

I think this one is my favorite:

 

One just cannot make this sh.it up....

 

"I don't know how it works at all"

 

Funny that none of you have figured out that about the only server that hasn't been hacked is her private server. The Russians working for Trump seem to have hacked most of the other Democratic servers and apparently several voting systems but they couldn't actually get into Hillary's server in their efforts to elect Trump.

 

Ha! You conspiracy nuts crack me up!

 

The more you keep saying it doesn't make it true.

 

They didnt need to. Podesta gave them everything they needed because he cant recognize a phishing attack.

That, and it was only in operation a short time before they dismantled it and destroyed everything.

 

We don't know that they didn't, it was wide open to anyone getting into it the first three months and did not even have basic encryption so all someone needed to read the emails was a simple text editor. And the FBI reported it MAY have been hacked we will just never know. Then it was taken off line when we found out about it and into the hands of the FBI. And since no Russians were working for Trump why did you make that fallacious statement? Also Comey and the FBI reported the Russians DID try to hack the RNC servers but failed because of the security measures on it.

"Russian hackers were unsuccessful in their attempts to breach the Republican National Committee (RNC), The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.

U.S. officials briefed on the attempted intrusion told the publication that the alleged hackers used the same methods that allowed them to hack the Democratic National Committee (DNC) but were ultimately thwarted by the RNC cybersecurity systems."
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/310683-report-russians-failed-to-hack-rnc

Fail.

 

Hahahaha! Hillary speaking on something she is awful at! What is next giving a speech on how to win elections or how to keep your husband happy in the bedroom? Oh the irony!

 

Or perhaps since they were on Trump's side they didn't try very hard.

 

Putin said he wanted Trump to win and the hacking and release of the Emails is proof for all but the deliberatly blind. And we won't even get into the fake news campaign in Trump's favor.

 

Oh are you referring to myself and every security agency in the US. The only actual moron that doesn't yet understand that the Russians were working to elect Trump is Trump.

 

No the RNC had good cybersecurity as the FBI found. The Russians wanted to cause as much turmoil as they could didn't matter party. Look at the dirt they funnelled to the Clinton campaign about Trump and it had FAR more success thanks to the Democrats and the MSM.

 

Why would the DNC and her campaign emails cause her to lose?

 

They didn't the just helped the Russian effort to elect Trump. All part of the Trump campaign to portray Hillary as incompetant, corrupt, etc, etc.

And considering Trump's record thinking Hillary was the corrupt candidate is in retrospect hilarious.

 

Oh please the pentagon has been hacked. Target has been hacked. Many major banks and financial institutions have been hacked. The list is endless. If the Russians wanted to hack the RNC they certainly could have done so. And actually we don't know that they didn't but since Trump was their candidate we may never know.

 

How did her emails expose her as an incompetent, corrupt etc etc and is it bad the voters found that out? And she has been corrupt since her days in Arkansas so that was nothing new.

 

They tried they did not succeed, go argue with the FBI. They also held fake anti-Trump campaign rally's and other social media but bottom line none of it effected the outcome of the election and there was no collusion, conspiracy with the Trump campaign, get over it.

 

And? Muslim terrorist and third world dictators wanted Obama to win.

What hacking of Emails? There's no proof that Russia hacked anything.