In regards to your simplistic responses, as a general rule of thumb for many of those impeachable offenses, if they were "charged and proven," then Trump would already be in chains.
The problem is they need to drop the obstruction thing. They can still seek his financials because congress has a role in election law, and it may be that finance was one reason the Russians chose to help him. But the wingnuts in the dem party are tied to the Great White Whale for impeachment. Meanwhile, the Gop - which is so much better at this investigation bs - will shortly expose the dem bias in the top levels of the DOJ and FBI careerists. And the dems would do so much better exposing why Comey had to turn the election from Hill to Trump in Nov. Hint: some FBI guys in NY were about to go rogue and talk to the media about why Hill should have been indicted. Comey and McCabe screwed the pooch because they should have called them on influencing an election and fired them for cause on the spot. And let the election land where it may. But instead Comey punked out - which was odd because he was the director because he wouldn't let W bypass the 4th Amend.
That poster seems unwilling to even consider your solid list of items, or am I wrong? Not sure how we got over to impeachment again... this thread was about Nancy wanting Trump in prison, which is just SO much more fun to think about... When the Dems win the WH in 2020, I wonder who the new AG will be and if he'll (or she'll) be given marching orders to prosecute??
Given how quickly he responded and the fact that he repeatedly included the phrase "any credible evidence" for some of those items makes me believe you are correct.
I think disclosing his financials at Trump Inc will destroy his reputation, and make great ridicule of those who still support him.
History is full of "woulda, coulda, shoulda", Mr.T -- usually fabricated by whichever faction gets to write or revise history after the conflict is settled. I note intently your use of the word, "IF". Everyone has done that since the dawn of human history.... Trump is not "in chains", and based on what 'evidence' and/or 'proof' that has surfaced so far, it is most unlikely that he ever would be. But your faction will go on squandering our national energy on these frivolous idiocies while our adversaries and opponents rejoice! I really do hope your radical Democrat cabal impeaches Trump. Throw down that gauntlet, and then let's see who is made to look like a bunch of fools!
Nah.... once it is established once and for all that this is a financial con man, the supporters will just point out what a GREAT financial con man he is... These are people that would have said about the Titanic a year later, "Well, it's not rusting that fast"
... and you did not trouble yourself to list even ONE of them...? . Typical radical Democrat -- "all hat and no cattle"....
Well, to be fair, "whiny bitch of a snowflake" is relatively subjective and would be hard (but not impossible) to prove in a court of law.
For Polly there is no evidence without conviction and maybe not even then. LOL But, really, a conviction would be based up Trump trying but failing to obstruct, and who wants to go there.
They really don’t care nor will they. Like trump said directly, “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn’t lose any voters, okay?” trump said, mimicking firing a gun with his fingers. “It’s, like, incredible.” He loves stupid voters
Nor am I going to waste my time posting links that are easily found online for you to ignore. I’ll give you an example of one that is simply common sense, trump golfs about every 5 days on his privately owned golf courses. The taxpayer is forced to rent — from those facilities — equipment and rooms which results in profit to the facility. Which results in an increase in trumps bank account. Him being a snowflake was proven by them having to hide a warship from his view. I could also list numerous twitter posts where he incessantly whines — but I fail to see if changing your opinion so I won’t bother. The internet is begging to make you educated, you just have to want to know.
Fun fact: trump has spent more of taxpayer funds on golf in two years than Woods has won in golf in his entire lifetime.
By the same token, that kind of behavior from a president shouldn't be tolerated. There have to be consequences.
Hmmm.... had to think about that for a minute.... Let's go over my 'Trump Response Chart' Resignation before 2020 Election - Full Tiger Defeat in Primary (Listen to Bill Weld talk for 5 minutes and tell me he wouldn't be a better representative of your party) - Full Tiger Defeat in 2020 Election - Double Full Tiger Impeachment in House - Half Tiger Impeachment in House w/Conviction in Senate - Double Full Tiger (with fee to pick my jaw off the floor) Indictment leading to conviction after Election - Tiger myself to an oblique injury Serious illness - Quiet toast (CostCo champagne) Death - Quiet toast (Upgraded champagne) So I guess I don't see much clapping in my future when it comes to Trump but hopefully some Tigers
Happened. Donald Trump Blows As Much Taxpayer Money On Golf As Richest Pro Golfer Tiger Woods Earns Golfing
obstruction.... as for prison woudl be the "individual 1" thing.. but he would never go to prison, no US President would, just hand slaps
there is still a chance Trump will resign between the time he loses in 2020 and the next President takes office so that his VP can pardon him like Nixon's VP did
Woods earns about $2 million per year off of golf [source] (the rest of his earnings come from endorsements). Trump has currently spent $102 million [source] in his first two years. Should I do the math for you? Or do you believe Woods has been playing for 51 years?