Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

Because Christ doesn't mean alot to Protestants?

 

None of which have anything to do with women's bodies. As your below list makes clear.

Name one single pro-life person who thinks that women should be charged, if you are even remotely capable of doing so. The left likes to talk about 'pro-life lies.' Well this is certainly a MASSIVE pro-choice lie, that women would be locked up!

100,000,000 children as proclaimed by @Derideo_Te?

Why?

When exactly did I agree to that?

 

So you agree with my definition, that having a say means to voice ones opinion?

 

Well if that's the case, then why did the Supreme Court need to deliberate in Roe v Wade? The case should've been decided before it even started!

 

YOU asked for ADDITIONAL reason why there would be difference AFTER I said half the population would lose the right to their bodies.

Getting a little "dishonest" with your questions?????

So you don't think that people who commit illegal acts should be prosecuted and punished!!!!?????

Wow! Don't you think if we wiped away laws and courts and jails there would be a lot of chaos??!!!

Impossible to state exact numbers...but there will OBVIOUSLY be many more IF abortion is made illegal.

How many do YOU think there will be ??

Why will women being incarcerated affect families and divorce? You REALLY have to ask that???

In the following exchange:



↑FoxHastings:
BTW, nowadays most women will be able to have safe abortions even if self righteous busy bodies with no life get abortion banned."""
Click to expand...

YOU answered:
"""Surely you think that there would be some difference.

chris155au, Yesterday at 7:23 AM Report"""


Didn't see you deny people who want to ban abortion are self righteous busy bodies with no life...

 

Sorry for assuming you were Catholic. I love Protestants/ have close family ties to Lutherans. They have crucifixes in their churches/ homes also.

 

“Illegal or not” can t just be dismissed. One thing is when they are illegal they were not reported
I don’t understand your comment about the mans role in this. He knew the consequences as did she. He knew that he would be responsible for a child if she chose to have HIS child. Let me ask you a question. Who do you think should have the final word if there is a disagreement? If he wants the baby should she be forced to breed against her will? If she is against abortion should she force it to have one? He knew that she would have the final word and if it is a child he knew we would be responsible for it for 18 years. Men are not stupid
Sorry that you see women are less respected in our culture. I guess women achieving more and being more educated is worthy of disrespect . I see women as being respected a lot more or are you saying they are less respected because they are sexual like men. After all sex should only be for men (sarcasm alert)

 

Women were still getting abortions from sympathetic doctors when it was illegal.

The woman,

Breed? Women don't 'breed'.

No, never.

Yes, he knows she will have the final word no matter how much he may protest.

Your 'guesses' are rather silly and cliched.

If people could have this discussion and include a man's point of view, though we understand it's the woman's final choice, there may be a better understanding of what's actually going on and this conversation could advance. seems impossible and, honestly, I expected more.

 

Yes women were getting abortions by some doctors but they were not being reported.
If a woman is forced to carry a baby to term against her will she is breeding against her will..look up the word...we all breed,
What makes you think that a man who impregnate a woman does not discuss it with her? What makes you think that a pregnant woman does not discuss her situation with the potential father? You ar talking like a true extremist assuming that once she is pregnant it not discussed
Sorry you see women being educated and advancing as a cliché. I consider yours an insult when you say that women are less respected now. You don’t mean it as a cliché, you mean it in a misogynistic way

 

You can do some research on your own and read some stats if the subject interests you. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...believe-American-females-treated-dignity.html

 

Is that a surprise with Trump in office?

 

Then why did you assume that I was Catholic?

 

Well you haven't even given ONE reason how it would take away women's right to their bodies.

Stop being childish. For the millionth time, pro-lifers don't believe that it would be a crime for women to abort. Its a sign that you're losing the argument if you keep bringing this up. It has been dealt with.

Yeah sure, but I'm not sure what that has to do with the abortion debate.

Yes there would be more, and its impossible to say how many. Certainly not 100,000,000 as you thought!

 

Who would be forcing her to carry a baby? The man?

 

DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH , the LAW banning abortion....,goodgawd...

 

Yes, I have frequently and childish people obviously couldn't understand.

Besides if you can't figure out how banning abortion takes away women's right to their own bodies then I don't think there are enough words to make you understand, and I don't think you want to.

LOL! It has been "dealt with" ??? By whom? YOU ?

UH, it's pretty basic...if something is banned, then doing it is against the law....can you understand that basic, simple statement???

Do you think everyone who breaks the law should go free?

Why?
Why don't you think that people who commit illegal acts should be prosecuted and punished?

That's a simple question so why can't you answer it?

OK, you're being deliberately obtuse here...
The WHOLE abortion debate is BASED on fighting to keep it legal.... and you have to know that and I can't figure out why you're acting like you haven't a clue..

Except I never "thought" nor mentioned 100,000,000...

(I guess mental confusion is not just for seniors anymore....)

 

I thought you said they would still be able to get an abortion if abortion was banned.

 

chris155au said: ↑
Who would be forcing her to carry a baby? The man?
Click to expand..."""""""""""



FoxHastings: DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH , the LAW banning abortion....,goodgawd...

And what has that got to do with the question you asked (above) ??

Nothing. The "man" can't force her to abort or gestate.

And, yes, banning abortion would force some women to gestate, not all, some...

 

Uh, yes, ME! And you haven't been able to state ONE SINGLE pro life person who supports women being charged with abortion if it was banned. Not ONE!

Yes, it would be banned in the sense that it would no longer be a medical procedure included under the health system. Doctors would be charged with operating outside of this system if caught performing an unauthorised procedure and possibly be charged with murder. What does this have to do with women having the right to their own bodies?

No.

When did I say that people who commit illegal acts should be prosecuted and punished?

Then why did you 'like' @Derideo_Te's post in which they stated 100,000,000?

No, it's for you too!

 

Correct.

The only thing which forces a pregnancy, is MOTHER NATURE!

 

!

THAT IS THE HYPOCRISY!

WHY don't they want people who break the law prosecuted?

But. there is ONE I know of, Trump.

If that's what you think banning abortion means then you are so far away from the truth I doubt anyone could show you how wrong you are.

I'll try once more: Banning abortion means that having an abortion is illegal. It has nothing to do with health insurance.

Banning abortion, making abortion illegal, takes away women's right to their own bodies....that has been explained to you about a thousand times and if you can't "get it" that's on you.

Then why do you think that women who have an illegal procedure(abortion) done shouldn't be charged with breaking the law.

You do know that breaking the law is illegal, don't you????

That is your response to : "" Why don't you think that people who commit illegal acts should be prosecuted and punished?""

??? What? Did you even read the question?


I NEVER said you said ""that people who commit illegal acts should be prosecuted and punished""


Your ideas that they shouldn't be is what is in question.

DUHHHH, because I like his post....was that really that hard to figure out?

Uh, so what's YOUR excuse ?

 

Oh, how cute! Another imaginary figure instead of facts.

 

That member that I have on IGNORE for obvious reasons is spouting bovine excrement!

The figure I cited was ONE MILLION, not 100,000,000!

Just reinforces WHY I sent him to Cyberia.

 

Those ridiculous posts are a waste of time.....I don't know why I do it but Cyberia may be coming soon

 

Your avatar is a crucifix.