Personally, I prefer the person most qualified for a job, not the color of their skin or their professed bigotry as a basis for the job. MO has demonstrated that she is a racist and cares only about what she can get out of any situation. Not a good choice for public office as we already have to many democrats doing that. Before you attack, republicans are also guilty of this behavior, just not as blatant about it in their public actions.
Yet that tends to be the most prevalent type of argument from the liberals. Funny how you accept it from your side but not the other.
Considering that all I said was that I liked her...it would seem the issue here is not MY point of view but YOURS as you clearly do not like that I liked her. Some of us do not judge by political talking point or skin color. I thought her to be intelligent and available and even moderately attractive, you know what a first lady should be. You probably think of her as a commie Gorilla man and jerk of to nude Melania pics on the internet. Do not place your words in my mouth less I begin to take it personally.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Funny, you have no proof she said that...… stuff that's made up proves nothing.. What does? You mean asking for proof is a bad thing??? OH, YA, to righties with NO POINT, it is. Not funny how you can't prove that either !!!
Your defense of your statements and attempts to insult me just show how biased and unimaginative you truly are. Citing your own desires and projecting them off onto others in defense of yourself and an attempt to do as you admonish me not to do, you put words in my mouth. Are you honest enough to admit it?
Okay RJ if you really wanna play then so be it. Firstly, I paid you no insult but may indeed begin as you seem to be asking for it. I do not "Desire" Melania as she seems rather cheap and fake and the commentary directed at you are honest evaluations based directly on your own statements. If you feel insulted by them I suggest a self evaluation is in order. I will happily admit I was not as kind or subtle as is my usual style but it was reaction to reading your ineptitude in thought directed at me and my very simple commentary which should have been easily understood by even someone as limited in intellectual prowess and discussion abilities as you project here. I have no need to defend such simple and honest OPINION as it is just that, however the Opinion of you I am generating may indeed require defense from the possible infraction it will likely direct toward me. There are of course certain risks well worth taking and you are making a very good case for such a situation. Should you desire further "Discussion", I'll be your huckleberry.
And your attempts to insult me continue, undiminished and untrue. They do not affect me as I merely consider the source and whether their words have value. Yours do not. Your continued attempt to claim that I am doing what you are so clearly doing just show a further lack of imagination and liberal indoctrination. BTW, you should omit the word "honest" when speaking of your opinion. You merely regurgitate anything liberal that you can and claim the truth of it, without ever questioning its truth. I used to have some respect for you, but you have destroyed that with this type of nonsense. Perhaps it is you who should take time to re-evaluate your views as to their truthfulness and accuracy, both of which are lacking.
You are correct....upon self evaluation I have come to understand you are not worth the effort and risk. Have A Nice Day
Or rather, upon instructions from your superiors on the subject. If you had "self evaluated" you would be shamed into admitting your lack of rational thought.
As president, Obama flat-out broke the law (the LAW) no less than three times, and he lied through his teeth to cram Obamacare down our throats. Yeah, I hate that... you mean you don't?!
My post was in response to your astonishment (?) which, as you said in Post #215, above, was "Wow, you really hated him didn’t you?" I didn't "hate" Obama, per se, but I did hate nearly every single thing he stands for, and nearly every single thing he DID, which as I said, included BREAKING THE LAW no less than three times! Now are we clear? I didn't mention Donald Trump in my post, who does have some mind-numbing faults and strange, erratic behaviors. "My guy" in the 2016 election would have been Texas Governor, Rick Perry, but the race ended up being between a flighty, high-stakes capitalist gambler, and, a reckless, conniving, pandering, STOOPID criminal. For me, the choice was all-too-obvious.... And, (*Sigh!*), it will probably be just as obvious, if not even more so in 2020.... . Rick Perry, an excellent Secretary of Energy who could have been a spectacularly-successful president!
And if the present incumbent is such a liar, how is he different from Obama? Obama did not even try to hide his lies, just made them bolder and more racially divisive. At least Trump, if he lies as you say he does, couches his lies in the good of the people, not just his race.
By the way, I note that in typical liberal fashison when you can not defend your position you cut and run. Oh, so typical.
I’m sorry, when you referred to President Obama as that”THING” Mrs Obama married, I inferred that you must hate him to refer to him in that way. Obviously I was mistaken.
Perhaps if you discussed comments and the reason for them you would be less often mistaken. You know, look for the truth before commenting.
