Elizabeth Warren is Still Dodging the Middle Class Tax Question

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by Bluesguy, Sep 13, 2019.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You haven’t provided anything for me to dismiss. I gave you a peer reviewed paper. You gave me “Nuh uh” in response.
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go back and find it. I’m not going to play this game again with you. You've been given the empirical data showing you that your position is wrong. Flail about as you may, reality will still be here while you throw your tantrums.
     
  3. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's a report of vital statistics. Nothing more.
    Even a moron knows that's not a scientific study.
    Peer review is meaningless, not that you would grasp that
     
  4. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You made the claim.
    Let's go
     
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pretending it isn’t a peer reviewed paper won’t change reality.
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And I’ve substantiated it. You seem to think I give a **** about your opinion. I don’t. I gave you empirical fact. You have yet to refute it.
     
  7. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn't.
    You said that.
    Peer review of report of vital statistics.
    BFD
     
  8. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote it or it didn't happen.
     
  9. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hand waiving away empirical evidence doesn’t make it go away. Sorry.
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
  11. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Evidence of what?
    You'll have to demonstrate causation.
    Go ahead, try. I dare you.

    By the way, what type of study is it?
    Random?
    Prospective?
    Cohort matched?

    Or, is it a just report of non- standardized vital statistics of nations?

    Your moment to shine
     
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Evidence single payer is better, and cheaper.
     
  13. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    30,989
    Likes Received:
    28,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why not address the real elephant in the room? Why is she courting Hillary? Why on earth would a supposed (primary limited btw) radical be anywhere close to Hillary? Could it be that she intends to run Hildebeast as her running mate? Can you imagine the untold fury of the democratic electorate? It would be fun to watch for sure, but I suggest the real question about Warren is her two faces of Eve approach to the campaign. All cozy with the establishment dems on one side, and all super radical in public... Fun stuff, for sure.
     
    redeemer216 likes this.
  14. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, you're ready to define better and discuss the data that establishes causation.
    Awesome
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already have. Read the paper. It’s all there.
     
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Giggles. Weak as ever
     
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By once again thoroughly demolishing your position? Lol, ok.
     
  18. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You sure did. I mean you even almost demonstrated that you knew something
     
  19. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didn’t “almost” do anything. I gave you a peer reviewed paper refuting your position. And all you have is “Nuh uh”. Lol
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
    redeemer216 likes this.
  20. Robert Urbanek

    Robert Urbanek Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    I have never met anybody on Medicare who wished the program would go away so they could go back to private insurance.
     
    redeemer216 likes this.
  21. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The position is yours.
    You can't seem to discuss the first thing about your paper.

    It's so fun watching you know nothing in front of everybody.
     
  22. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave you a peer reviewed paper refuting your position. And all you have is “Nuh uh”. Lol

    Everyone is laughing at your inability to deal with reality.
     
  23. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Funny, I had no position.
    The paper was defending your position?
    Sundowning tonight?
     
  24. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave you a peer reviewed paper refuting your position. And all you have is “Nuh uh”. Lol

    Everyone is laughing at your inability to deal with reality.
     
  25. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh yeah?
    Quote my position.

    Could you make this any easier?
     

Share This Page