Elizabeth Warren is Still Dodging the Middle Class Tax Question

I gave you a peer reviewed paper refuting your position. And all you have is “Nuh uh”. Lol

Everyone is laughing at your inability to deal with reality.

 

Qute my position

 

What’s a qute?

 

Quote my position and stop being weak

 

How does providing peer reviewed evidence supporting my position, and refuting yours, make me weak? Lol

 

You offered a paper supporting your position.
I offered no position.
I asked you to address some simple specifics of your paper, which you cannot.

One more chance at an easy question.
What is the study design?

 

Do you think anyone is filled by that bullshit statement you Justin made? Seriously? Lol

I’ve done so repeatedly. You are free to provide your own peer reviewed paper to rebut the one I gave you. But your “Nuh uh” doesn’t change emprical reality, not matter how badly your ideology is crushed because of it. Sorry.

 

Quote it or it didn't happen

Dude your weakness is so obvious, you can't even say what the basic study design is.

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

Of which you have no working knowledge and for which you don't recognize, draws no conclusions

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

You gave a WHO report of vital statistics data.
In no place does this paper indicate superiority of single payer system. You have claimed it, but the paper does not

 

To quote Scotty from Star Trek: I'm giving it all I've got captain.

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

Actually, my Medicaid is from a private insurance company too.

 

Well I don't doubt that you think it does. Perhaps you can point out the portion of the paper that draws that conclusion.

But I know you can't cuz you never read it

 

Perhaps a thank you to your fellow citizens is in order

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

The burden is always on the one who makes the claim. Are you new?

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

I have provided the evidence.
1. It is a report of vital statistics of various nations.
2. It draws no conclusion concerning the superiority of single payer.

3. There is no study design in place to evaluate the superiority of anything.

Your turn.

 

You’ve been given a peer reviewed paper which shows single payer is superior. Your only rebuttal is “Nuh uh”. You have provided no evidence what so ever to dispute the empirical data I’ve given you. We both know why you can’t do that. It’s very amusing watching you flail about and continue to try and shift the burden to me, instead of you having to provide evidence.

 

I'm sorry you haven't read your linky

 

Of course I have. Feel free to provide your own peer reviewed paper that refutes it. We both know why you can’t do that though.

 

Where's the link to the peer reviewed paper you cited? I know you cited it somewhere here apparently I can't find it. I thought it was post 27 I cannot seem to find it. My bad in advance. Interested in reading who reviewed this.

Once again, I'm not trying to be lazy, I literally don't see it lol.