WATCH LIVE: Public Impeachment Hearings (Yovanovich)

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MrTLegal, Nov 15, 2019.

  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2019
  2. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So now if it is unknown to the witness it is intimidation. That’s the crazy world of TDS.
     
  3. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your posts make no sense.

    Your obsession with my pair notwithstanding.
     
  4. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The witness is testifying against the president and the president has chosen that moment to attack her.

    Criticisms are one thing. Criticizing them while they are testifying against you, especially when you hold a position of great power, is intimidation of a witness.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  5. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They were crowing to impeach Clinton for 6 years before the actual impeachment process ever started. Like I said, it’s early in the ballgame. Grab a beer, sit back and enjoy the show.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  6. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bx4 likes this.
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah, whataboutism. Under Obama, ambassadors were coming back in body bags. Now everyone is upset because one got fired.
     
    Labouroflove likes this.
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One is not favored by TDS, the other is.
     
  9. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ....really!?

    If you put your threat in a place where the intended witness is likely to hear that threat, then you have engaged in witness intimidation.

    Trump writes it in his personal journal? Not intimidation. Trump writes it on twitter for his 80 million followers to see? Intimidation.

    Does that make sense to you?
     
    bx4 likes this.
  10. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go convict Tony Podesta if you think you can.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  11. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That ambassador in a body bag spawned 11 investigative committees and 8 reports.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  12. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are not actually counting on convicting Trump are you????
     
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She ONLY heard it because of Schiff for brains so I guess Schiff for brains wanted her intimidated.
     
  14. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no law against collusion. Stone is in jail for lying about collusion under oath at a congressional hearing, witness tampering and 5 other charges related to his clouding with Wikileaks and Russian intel to use stolen personal communications to help Trump win the election.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  15. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. As soon as that man leaves office, he will face convictions from multiple jurisdictions.
     
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look at the avalanche of investigations and subpoenas just because someone was freely and fairly elected.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  17. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake News. There was no collusion.
     
  18. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet folks like Brennan can lie to Congress and nothing happens.
     
    Robert likes this.
  19. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Please list some of those convictions, can ya? (items you think he will be convicted for doing)
     
  20. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does that theory make sense to you? Honestly?
     
  21. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He is the individual one that directed Michael Cohen to commit a felony.
     
  22. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Also Stone is home, not in jail as he told you.
     
    Thought Criminal likes this.
  23. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Facts are now theories. Schiff for brains told her about it during her testimony today because it was tweeted during the testimony.
     
  24. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    By the way, it is a felony to agree to commit a felony. Said person is not excused even if persuaded by others.
     
  25. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Funny how that works. If it's committed by one side, it's criminal. If it's committed by the other side, it's not.
     

Share This Page