Jihadis face execution without trial in Syrian jails as Assad says foreign ISIS members will be hang

Contrary to what you've been told, the terrorists are not Syrians. They are Islamic extremists from foreign countries. Many are from the Gulf states like Qatar as well as Turkomans from Central Asia. There are also Turkish Uighurs from China and Islamic jihadists from Bosnia, Kosovo, Albania and other countries in Europe. So tell me, what are they doing in Syria?

This latest outcry by the media about the terrorists being hanged without a trial, means they're applying pressure on Syria so they will free the American, British, KSA, French and Israeli agents that are embedded with the terrorists and will be hanging with them. Well let's face it, they are guilty.

When the media freaked out over the Syrian army going into E. Aleppo and Douma,
Russia in order to accommodate them opened a passageway for civilians. This way the agents were able to escape with them - as well as the terrorists who were taken by bus to Idlib.

I don't know what the coalition can do now, other than pay Syria vast sums of money to save them or go to war. Three hundred billion would just about do it. Either that or give Syria back their oil wells. They need the money to rebuild the country they all destroyed.

 

Syria doesn't have much in the way of functioning oil wells. Their oil sector has been in severe decline since 1996. Is Putting investing in reserve management?

Saudis who fought for ISIS go to prison in Arabia and some are executed.

You're funny, Jeannette... Everyone is to blame for Syria being a failed state except Bashar Assad.

Has Assad accepted the new constitution and reforms proposed by Putin?

 

The original article said they would be seen in "special terror courts" and I think they probably will get some sort of a trial. They will face "Syrian Law" which is probably not nearly as nice as American but a lot better than what they were giving to their own citizens. In any case it is due process in the country they are in, which is all anyone can expect.

My own feeling is that we should torture a few of them quite painfully and lengthily and video their suffering, Then use these tapes to make the others tell us how to capture whatever compatriots of theirs may be hiding among us, but also bribe them with release and money if they do, A carrot and stick approach

 

Ah yes, but so did your ancestors, when they entered Europe and began slaughtering the indigenous populations.

It wasn't just the Europeans they were killing, the tribes were killing one another off as well. When they fought the Europeans, they lost because the settlers were better armed. That happens you know.

The native Americans were hunters, and hunting requires a large amount of land to feed a small amount of people, so there is no way the natives could feed the population of millions that is now being attributed to them. As for the deaths, most natives died with the measles which was rampant before vaccinations. The colonists said that only the half breeds could survive the disease. The natives had no immunity.

As for the Europeans who farmed the lands and gave the colonists the highest standard of living in the world, if they didn't cross the pond for sustenance, they would have been heading Eastwards instead and killing the Russians and Slavs - which they have done, and are still doing - and for the same reasons.

 

You're funny! The whole world is in awe at Assad, and how he was able to fight off the US, UK, Fr, KSA, Israel, Qatar, Jordan and a bunch of others as well, and you're calling it a failed state? WOW! Quite a bit of delusion there, but then again what else is new?

As for the new constitution, that will take a while but I have a suspicion that it has to do with the Kurds wanting autonomy in the oil and gas rich lands that Washington stole, and Syria is not willing to give it to them.

I don't think Turkey wants the Kurds to have the oil and gas either. They prefer themselves. So let's see what happens?

 

Turkey doesn't want Syrian oil.. Russia signed an agreement with Assad last year to take control of all their oil.

Nobody is in awe of Assad. He's a screw up.

Don't know about the Kurds.. They are experienced oil field workers so maybe the Russians will hire them.

 

The blame lies with those who invaded syria and those who financed the invasion and war. At least to reasonable people.

Those gas attacks we lied about and blamed on Assad even as crazy as it appeared is now showing us the lies by our govt.

They always happened at critical times and when Assad would have been crazy to do them.haha

Those who were led to believe Assad used gas when it was against his best interest serves as a means test for idiocy. So how do you and others here who are so easily fooled even post here after being so wrong?

There ain't no idiot like an american idiot . How many of us just believed the lies about gas attacks? And how many times does our govt have to lie before the light bulb comes on ?

 

OP

"Jihadis face execution without trial"

Dear god - man's inhumanity to man? Wait a minute . . . maybe we should too? 'Take no prisoners'??

 

Not just the mid east, anywhere there is tribalism along with cultural and religious frictions. And these people have a long history and a long memory for wrongs done in the past.

 

Probably about the same thing that happens when people in the US say their neighbors and friends are drug dealers or users--they get arrested.

 

So if someone camped in your front yard, where you live now, and started shooting your family members so they could lay claim to your house, would you still call them settlers?

 

People have to let go of their embedded memories, otherwise they will never have inner peace.

 

Syria was a failed state by 2011.. Nobody invaded.

Look at Syrian history since 1947.. Its all about military coups, assassinations, slaughters and sectarian strife.

 

If it was common practice for the time period we live in, yeah.
Thing is, you're passing judgment on an historical event while applying morals that didn't exist back then, which is quite silly.

 

First of all no one was camping on anyone's front yard in the America's because there was no front yard. The natives didn't have defined boundaries - that's a Western innovation. They just used whatever land they could find for hunting since they didn't know anything else.

The Europeans wanted to farm, which was more advanced and provided a lot more sustenance, and so they clashed. These clashes have been going on between more advanced civilizations and primitive ones since the beginning of time - as well as throughout the world - otherwise we would still be living in caves.

Most times though it was the more primitive tribes that conquered the advanced ones, and in time the primitive ones would learn and then advance even further than the society they conquered. This didn't happen in the US though. There were natives who assimilated into the European society and a lot of intermarriage, but there were natives who couldn't or wouldn't, so they were given reservations and land to hunt on and continue their lifestyle.

These reservations do not have to follow state laws, and are independent. Many tribes are now wealthy from oil wells or from gambling casinos, which would not be allowed otherwise.

I don't know why you and others keep trying to make it an ownership issue when there was no such thing as ownership among the native Americans. Whoever could, took whatever he wanted - so why is it so bad that the Europeans did the same?

 

He might be a dictator. But considering the region, he's not worse than most others. We have allies who are worse.

 

Get off it Margot, I knew Syrians who were moving back and praising Assad's secular and all inclusive society - which no doubt freaked Saudi Arabia.

In September 2011 the EU banned Syrian oil and petroleum products, and then in April the next year they lifted the ban so they could buy the stolen Syrian oil from the 'moderate' terrorists like ISIS and Al Nusra - and supply them with weapons as well.

 

Assad is not a dictator, that's merely an MSM propaganda ruse. He was voted in with a very large majority and with a very large turnout. Something that certainly can't be said with the ones we put in as heads of states.

 

LOLOL Syrian oil production has been in decline since 1996.

 

LOLOl Of course Bashar is a dictator just as his father was. Putin proposed a constitution and reforms which Assad rejected.

Nothing has changed... and Assad is still a loser.. an impediment to Syrian progress.

Let Iran or Russia pay for rebuilding Syria. Throwing good money after bad is stupid.

 

First of all Putin never proposes, he makes suggestions - but Russia always does that for nations to acquire peace. It's called diplomacy and its good for trade. They did it for Ukraine before the war broke out so it could remain intact but Poroshenko rejected it, and also for Kim so he could attain peace with S. Korea and a way to denuclearize.

As for Assad being a dictator, go tell it to the international observers at the election. They said that even though embassies tried to keep the Syrians from voting, and many had to fly to Syria to vote, the turnout was over 70% and that the election was an affirmation of the 'will' of the Syrian people.

The Syrian people won, because they still have their all inclusive and secular country and are not under the enslavement of sharia law. Nor have their enemies managed to Balkanize Syria like Yugoslavia, a system that Britain devised to keep nations weak and at each others throats. Why do you think they drew the lines in the sand?

Bravo to the Syrians for standing their ground against the jihadist invaders, and they love Putin for the help he gave them. The pity is they couldn't stop the genocide completely, even though the Christians did have Assad to protect them, so that many were forced to leave. But they were returning to Syria before the war, so as soon as things settle they'll probably return again.

 

Such generosity. Invade a country, slaughter most of the indigenous people then 'allow' them to live on a small part of their own lands.
The native Americans were hunter gatherers, which was a natural form of population control. If the camp moved to a new hunting ground there are only so many children they can carry with them, so that's how many they had.
Then after the Europeans invaded they began farming, meaning they stayed in one place and began breeding like rabbits, polluting everything around them.
As for living in caves, we're far too civilized for that.

 

Oh then the native children didn't die from diseases, lack of food, etc., like their European counterparts. They practiced birth control.

 

Right he got 98% of the votes..

 

Some countries need dictators. especially in the middle east region. I mean look what happens every time we depose them? Think Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria. They're not like us, so we should mind our own effing business; we (US & UK) have enough problems of our own - or haven't you noticed?