Judge Calls For Full Appeals Court Review Of Ruling Dropping Michael Flynn Charges

he’s not a defendant and doesn’t have the right.

 

Mate, here is an example. It is fact you had no role in that 'court of appeals hearing.' Wilkinson did. She responded, as required by that Court, by making written submissions to that Court on behalf of Sullivan.. That means two things.....(a) That Court made Sullivan a party, and (b) he did what that Court required, and via Wilkinson, responded to the Court as required by that Court. If you wish to deny that, I have a lovely Bridge which spans Sydney Harbour I can sell to you real cheap.

 

just isn’t true.

 

Yours for $100.00 cash. Deal?

 

If he was really coerced, then he can raise that defense and walk away scott free. But we all know he wasn't really coerced and therefore has no valid defense, which is why Trump had Barr drop the case.

 

With the crap the left supported Hillary getting away with, the hypocrisy is incredible. But keep complaining and exposing it, blatantly.

 

Yeah, sure....Are you OK with such things?

Something seems rotten in Flynn's case — and maybe others ...
thehill.com › opinion › judiciary › 495366-something-...
Apr 30, 2020 - Prosecutors did this, Powell argues, by threatening that if he refused to plead, they would prosecute his son. The son, also named Michael Flynn, ...

 

Oh yah! A tweet from when it all started that doesn't take into account recently exposed information on certain FBI agents misconduct!!!

 

Are Democrats really going to rely on a twitter post from Donald Trump to legitimize this sham prosecution of Flynn? Like everything, they're taking it out of context cause they have no shame.

Flynn was coerced into a false admission of guilt by an FBI agent threatening to prosecute his son. The underlying allegations against Flynn were dubious, and the FBI agents conducting the interview determined that Flynn had not made false statements. The FBI agent determined that these statements were merely failures of recollection. The entirety of the Mueller investigation was a political witch hunt by Democrats and Bush Republicans that amounted to flimsy allegations and cases against political opponents, as well as numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct and civil rights violations.

The last four years has not been a demonstration of corruption in the Trump administration, but instead, the obvious criminal and unlawful conspiracies perpetrated by members of two-party system in this country. We've literally uncovered a sex trafficking/slavery operation that has been utilized, facilitated and protected by politicians in this country for decades, and we have a fourth, and part of fifth, estate that is so easily distracted with this BS Flynn case. As far as I know, no key witnesses in any of these cases against the Trump administration are systematically being taken out in odd circumstances.

 

Wheres the charges against re Turkey? Oh right...there are none.

 

The Flynn judge is not a corrupt scumbag posing as AG like Barr is. He knows the facts of the case better than anyone and he is very troubled by the actions of the crooked AG. I commend judge Sullivan.

 

And yet, as recent documents show....he was coerced. You can ignore that fact if you want. But it's not going to go away and Flynn WILL walk free. As he rightfully should.

 

I don't think he's corrupt either. But he obviously has a bad case of TDS. Because he's ignoring things any other judge that upholds thier neutrality would be livid at.

 

I know there are people not interested in the truth and only focused on their fantasy narratives so I will just put this here for reference.

FBI concluded Flynn wasn't an agent of Russia and didn't believe he was trying to lie, notes show

"A summary of a Jan. 25, 2017, meeting during which the FBI briefed the DOJ's National Security Division and other key FBI and DOJ leaders stated: “FBI advised that the purpose of the interview was to determine if General Flynn was acting as an agent of Russia. FBI advised that General Flynn was very open and forthcoming.” According to the memo, when the FBI asked Flynn about whether he discussed sanctions with Russia’s ambassador during the presidential transition period, “Flynn denied having the conversation and stated he would not have that type of conversation. FBI prompted Flynn with language used during the call, and he still denies having the conversation.”

The DOJ memo said the FBI “believed Flynn believed what he was saying was true” and that the bureau “recognized the discrepancy between the statements and the actual calls, but determined that Flynn was not acting as agent of Russia.” The memo also notes that the FBI “advised that the decision was made by FBI leadership not to confront Flynn with the actual tech cuts” of the recorded intercepts of his call with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak."



"Flynn's lawyers told the court that they believed the new information was further exculpatory evidence demonstrating Flynn's innocence.

“On July 7, 2020, the Government produced to General Flynn 14-pages of additional evidence, demonstrating (i) his innocence; (ii) the absence of any crime; (iii) government misconduct in the investigation of General Flynn; and (iv) prosecutorial misconduct in the suppression of evidence favorable to the defense,” Flynn’s defense team said, arguing that the information was known to at least 10 high-level officials at the FBI and the DOJ and that the evidence “negates multiple essential elements required for the prosecution of a false statement offense.”"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...didnt-believe-he-was-trying-to-lie-notes-show

Keep up with the denial thing folks, so that we can laugh at you later. I love doing "I told ya so" posts.


Trump won't last through to the primaries. He will quit first.
Trump won't the primary.
Trump won't win the election.
Clinton, by a land slide.
Trump will quit in the first 100 days.
Trump will be impeached and in jail in the first six months.
Trump's family will be in jail in the first year.
Trump will ruin the economy. It will be Armageddon!!!!!
I could keep going but I am getting tired of typing.

 

The level of deception is just as the saying is in CTH: Cold anger. There's no need for fancy arguments really, the moment that the FBI refused to show Flynn the transcripts it could not legitimately argue for a false statements charge. Because if the defendant(Flynn) is unaware that what he was saying was false, you can't possibly charge that.


"knowingly and willfully". From the beginning, from the very onset there was never a case. Even a full panel will uphold the writ of mandamus because otherwise, the court would have to rewrite 1001 to say that it's still a crime if you unknowingly make a false statement.

 

It's Weissman all over again. They didn't do anything to him for his first fiasco that was thrown out by the SCOTUS so he is encouraged to do it again. Evil comes in many forms. Let's hope that he is one of them caught up in the indictments that come down from the Durham investigation.

 

You are right. There are none.................yet.

 

And there won't be. Ever. Flynn will have been forgotten about by next January by TPTB.

 

Nah. Biden's DOJ will do their job. Flynn is a very lucky fella that he is not yet charged with some very nasty offences. That he lied to the FBI and to Pence is the very least of his 'sins.' No way can that bloke be allowed to walk off over the horizon with all his entitlements as a man of honour. That, he is not.

 

The only way that they could go after Flynn for lying again is if they ignore all the evidence that has come out showing that he didn't actually lie to the FBI to begin with.

 

With the threat of prosecution looming overhead and bankruptcy because of entrapment.

 

These people don't care about the law. They don't care that the FBI entrapped Flynn. All they care about is not losing out on this conspiracy theory they've been waging for the past 3 years.

 

He lied. That the FBI knew he was lying is irrelevant. After all, that was their plan was it not? To test whether he would lie to them? He lied to them on a material issue.

 

it’s obviously either you aren’t a lawyer or the laws down under are drastically different