See there's that gymnastics I was talking about.... we know trumplicans don't care about that see Garland so why the spin? I'd rather be told the ugly truth than be insulted with a crappy lie
And nominating Ginsburg's replacement will be the fuel that gets them there we all know it probably put a bunch a Democrats who were on the fence about adding justices over. When that happens watch the trumplicans play victim
It won't be a rush....but it will be done and I'll tell you why. It will be further evidence that Trump stands on his promises. It will give Democrats the opportunity to go absolutely bonkers, attempt another coup, burn down some more buildings, and just further convince real Americans that the left is determined to install a Marxist/ Globalist Government. The bigger the landslide the better off we'll be when the Marxist Democrat Party uses their 650 lawyers, already retained, to harvest mail in votes and contest the election. Republicans are well within the Constitution to affirm a new Justice. Marxist/Democrats make veiled threats like the quote above. Americans are ready! I've already seen Antifa driven out of towns in Arizona.It just might get bloody! No threat but we all know.....it can happen!
no the committee chairs made the rule. McConnell, or the McConnell rule undid the Biden rule like your all wanted in 2016
Joe Biden and the rest of these LYING Democrats should shut their Pie Holes and let President Trump do his Constitutional duty to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. I was feeling a bit Sorry for the Democrats, but after a bit of research I discovered not to my surprise what a bunch of Hypocrites they are.
What's the average amount of days between nomination and appointment? When's the latest a judge has been nominated?
they won't if republicans change the rules that they forced on Obama in 2016 no reason for dems to follow any rules they do not have to either, I say add seats to the SC until they have control, fair is fair some republicans are pushing back though, only takes 4 to stop this
Be nice if both sides simply ruled according to the Constitution. Obamacare would never have blighted the system.
You say that like you think the Democrats, if the roles were reversed, would not do exactly what the GOP is doing now.
Is that the post your talking about??? If so I'll assume you mean point 2 in which case dont ruling just get affirmed by the lower courts in cases of ties?
What rules? This is how it has always been. When the Senate majority and White House are different parties nominees do not get confirmed. When both are the same it goes forward. This is the historical precedent.
Oh I figure they probably would too and I would bitch then too. See my comments on Cavanaughs appointment (dems shouldve went against his record not unsubstantiated rumors) especially after the Garland thing but the problem is when both parties are content on eye for an eye it leaves the whole world blind
Here we can just spit bits and bytes. Surprisingly civil for the most part considering all the late election cycle political agitation in the MSM and on the streets.
Well ya generally.... I think I'm pretty nice on here myself lol. You can gauge what gets people aggravated based on content normally
What exactly is the "lie"? The Senate always has the power to advise and consent or to do nothing. Elections and politics will always determine the outcome.
Oh please you know damn well the dems would nominate and confirm if the role was reversed. You know damn well in 2016 you would've done it if you had the Senate but you didn't. This moral high ground bs is just that, BS.