Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful

Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by Kokomojojo, Oct 27, 2020.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And there is no causation.

    That's IMO a fine example of how to "lie with statistics". The short time period without inclusion of the trends well before the order and the lack of current data are dead giveaways.
     
    Kokomojojo and Ddyad like this.
  2. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,663
    Likes Received:
    25,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    SHHHH! ;-)
     
  3. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correlation is also not causation... you keep barking up the wrong tree.

    Speaking of which, short studies like that are terrific for nailing down what you want to study next. Which is to say you need numbers, not whining.
     
  4. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Meehan is a anti-vaxxer kook.
     
  5. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since you wearing a mask protects me, why would you not want to do so?
    I’m more than willing to give you that courtesy
     
  6. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It has been exactly that for hundreds of thousands
     
  7. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,168
    Likes Received:
    28,656
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps, maybe, I'd just rather you stay home. I still wear a mask though. Because it is required by the state, not courtesy.
     
  8. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank God for mask mandates then.. since people like you care so little for others
     
  9. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Causation is the right tree to bark up. Correlation (and becasue the data well before the order is not shown that data does not actually show correlation if you think it through - the flat section which coincides is just an artifact of the selection of a seven day rolling average - BTW, why did they select a seven day rolling average??) does not prove that masks are effective?

    That's exactly what I'm asking for - numbers.
     
  10. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, that's what you need.

    Might one conclude you don't actually have anything substantive?
     
  11. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is not data from before and after the dates in the Kansas mask chart ?? The chart as it stands has nothing substantive. It is meaningless without the inclusion of the order start date and data well before the order start date as well as the ~ 2 months from the chart end date.
     
  12. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Note: a blog post from an eye doctor isn't the best source for your epidemiological information . . . especially one who makes money from selling "alternatives" to the methods he's criticizing.

    God, what a hot mess of complete nonsense. It's a silly, deceitful shell game:

    1) Claim that meta-analysis is superior to all other forms of research . . . itself a highly controversial claim.
    2) Appeal to meta-analysis of INFLUENZA and pretend it is about COVID/pretend all respiratory viruses spread in exactly the same way.
    3) Add in a bunch of other non-peer reviewed articles.
    4) Claim victory.

    Here's an actual meta-analysis that has been peer reviewed and actually takes the the time to consider the fact that not all respiratory viruses are the same (the key assumption of the pill-selling eye doctor's blog): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253999/
     
  13. Kode

    Kode Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    26,644
    Likes Received:
    7,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yardmeat likes this.
  14. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  15. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    @AFM
    Read all three sentences, at least, not just the last one. General efficacy = yes. The "more evidence" refers to further exploration OF PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. In general, they work.
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2020
  16. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sounds like Fauci's resume. He was trained and did his residency in internal medicine.
     
  17. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you think it sounds like Fauci's resume, you aren't familiar with either person's resume. Fauci is one of the world's leading experts in epidemiology, regardless of where he did his residency: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci#Career

    Meehan is not an epidemiology expert of any kind. In fact, at least one court has kicked him out as an "expert witness" due to his lack of credentials in this area. Meehan is an eye doctor selling vitamins as COVID prevention and writing up conflict-of-interest blog posts like the one I pointed out faults with that you didn't address.
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2020
    ronv likes this.
  18. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You were just shown how high level scientific/medical evidence refutes your claim, and what constitutes low level, insufficient evidence, then you turn around and plop down another turd of low level evidence.

    Can you say "science"?
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2020
  19. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again, numbers, not whining.
     
  20. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I am getting very tired of crap from kooks.
     
    yardmeat likes this.
  21. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uhhhh no...not even at all

    It's not complicated.

    Various counties have mandates...others do not.

    Compare those that do to the ones that don't and you have a graph. That graph shows a much higher infection rate in counties without the mandate

    And then there's the White House.

    That was self evident
     
    Last edited: Oct 28, 2020
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not according to the CDC. They do not protect anyone from infection and they do not prevent the spread from normal breathing of an infected person.
     
  23. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then quote the CDC saying so
     
  24. Distraff

    Distraff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    10,833
    Likes Received:
    4,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess you can tell all those doctors and medical experts that they have been wrong to wear masks for decades now.
    [​IMG]
     
  25. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,671
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fauci has been dead wrong multiple times. He trusted the Chinese Communist Party and the WHO. Why would anyone not question what he comes up with?

    And it has been shown that Vitamin D and Zinc do have a positive effect on reducing the symptoms of Covid-19. It is the symptoms (namely inflammation of the lungs and resultant fluid production) that kills people.
     
    Ddyad likes this.

Share This Page