In Our Hearts We Know Trump Won

Because the vote count closely matched the opinion polls and exit polls, demonstrating statistically that large-scale fraud was impossible???

Run that one by me again...

 

Baseless hyperbolic nonsense!

 

The vote count never matched the polls as you say until wee hours of the morning.......suspiciously. It was all programmed.

 

Big words make you right!

 

Guess several hundred affidavits meant they didn't all keep their mouths shut. Hey, were those pictures in Detroit of cardboard being placed on windows to stop observation just fake pictures?

 

GARBAGE. There was nothing suspicious about it. We know FROM THE POLLING that Biden voters were far more likely to vote by mail, so their votes were guaranteed to be counted later wherever the mailed ballots were counted after the in-person votes. We also know for a fact that the counties where the count was most delayed were almost always heavily Democrat urban counties. What would really have been suspicious would be if the last votes counted DIDN'T overwhelmingly favor Biden. Your "argument" has zero (0) logical merit. Zero. Deal with it.

Conclusively refuted above.

 

Affidavits that correct procedures were followed, but misinterpreted by people who were too ignorant to understand what they were seeing.

No, just someone makin' $#!+ up.

 

You mean like the 2016 election?

 

Given the history of poll taking and elections, it's more likely that the 2016 election involved fraud than the 2020 election. Just say'n.

 

... says you.....

 

No; in 2016, fraud was a much more plausible explanation for the outcome.

 

Except their was no overt indication or evidence of massive fraud in 2016 like there was in 2020. The only fraud in 2016 was covert by the Obama administration using federal intelligence and enforcement agencies to affect the election. The dossier itself was probably illegitimate but not fraudulent other than as used by the aforementioned agencies.

 

It was conclusively refuted when you were warned that unsolicited mail in balloting, which is rejected in all of Europe, invites fraud......and it did. The Scotus needs to hear and examine the evidence.

 

As I stated in another post there was no overt indication or evidence of massive fraud in 2016 as there was in 2020. The only known -- speculation, supposition, wishes, or plausible explanations not included -- fraud in 2016 was covert fraud carried out by the Obama administration.

 

No you can't even accept the smallest of evidence. That disqualifies you.

 

No, to be precise, we know that most of the mail-in votes would be for Biden, not vice versa.

 

There was no more evidence of fraud in 2020 than in 2016, just more people falsely claiming evidence of fraud.

You mean like the FBI's exquisitely timed announcement of its nothing-burger investigation of Hillary's emails....?

 

I see. So, if the fabricated "evidence" is just "small" enough, it must be valid...?

Somehow, I kinda figured it'd be something like that....

 

<yawn> Try reading in context. Biden voters were more likely to vote by mail than Trump voters. There was no implication in my statement that they were more likely to vote by mail than in person.

So, just another in the long roster of Trumpazoid nothing burgers...

 

There are tons of evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. AFAIK the only courts who heard evidence and rejected it were also participants in the fraud, for example the PA supreme court.

The FBI did not announce a "nothing burger." They announced that they would not prosecute the known crimes (which is not in their authority to announce, but who's counting.) But, yes, that was part of the general fraud perpetrated by the administration.

 

No there aren't. There are only tons -- kilotons, megatons -- of absurd, easily debunked false claims of evidence.

By this embrace of an absurd conspiracy theory, you prove yourself a worthy supporter of the most despicable creature ever elected to lead a major democratic nation.

Yes, of course they did.

That is precisely a nothing burger.

You thus again prove yourself a worthy supporter of the most despicable creature ever elected to lead a major democratic nation.

 

All indications are that Trump supporters cheated in the 2016 elections, the math proves it.

 

Nope. Flat false. Is there any known specific case of it, other than the one fraudulent vote known to have been cast for Trump?

When there is some, and not just a bunch of absurd and easily debunked nothing burgers.

 

you are confusing people making baseless accusations on paper with evidence. The courts also pointed that out.

observers were not prevented from observing in detroit. Why are you making **** up?

 

you can not demonstrate a single main in vote was fraudulent. 60 straight courts, mostly republican judges, have told you this as well.