How the democrat party become the party of hatred and division

In the last decade there is no doubt that the democrat party has become the party of hatred and division. Additionally they have become the champions of terrorist groups. Most of the hatred and division accelerated after Obama was elected.

Worst of all as we can see with Biden they want to be dictators over every aspect of American life.

 

its what people voted for..they wanted communism, now they gonna get it!

 

Dems and Republicans have sunk to the Hatfields and McCoys.

But we've seen the Republican answer to unity ... it sucks.



Vs.

 

Become? The party was created to preserve racist ideologies and continued to this day.

 

While I agree with your premise - " Blue a party of hatred and division" - none of what you say supports your claim - other than "Champions of Terrorist groups" - which is an unsupported claim.

 

Anyone would believes the hate and division is one sided is being dishonest

 

This is a failed argument as well - there is a differenced between Communism and Socialist Policy - "Wealth Redistribution" - see post 5: you guys need to up your game.

 

I disagree with the premise, but I have to admit your assessment of the OP took the words out of my mouth. Good job.

 

Man, I wish.

 

So, are you a Hatfield or a McCoy?

 

True - but it is not a black vs white Paradigm either - as Blue would like us to believe. Blue has been leading the charge of late - and certainly since Trump exiting the White House - of hate and division.

The latest Blue clown show - Demonizing protesters as "Terrorists".

 

I can support claim if you like - can start with above post

 

Democratic Party. Get yourself some credibility.

 

Disagree. The left seems to have the ability to separate the two. The right doesn't. To the right, protester or rioter is determined by politics, not facts

 

Would you rather they be called piece of crap scumbag low-life a holes?

 

I’m up for it if you are.

 

There are many reasons I don't belong to EITHER political party - that's one of them.
I would support a centrist, fiscal conservative, socially moderate party - but that's not an option right now. Neither
party is fiscally conservative.

 

Oh? Is this peaceful protesting?

 

Yes, and beyond that wealth distribution can be accomplished without socialism.

 

In the example cited "Protest on the Capital" - it was Blue who exhibits the inability to separate the two - their decision based on politics not facts.

So at least in this instance - Your claim is demonstrably false.

 

No, but it is also not "terrorism".

 

I believe I called it a "Riot" did I not ? What part of that word is giving you trouble such that you think you need to post this abject nonsense -which is far beneath you.

So your inferred claim is then what ? - Any Protest that gets out of hand - those involved and associated are now all to be deemed "Terrorists"

Could you possibly set the bar any lower - and do you not understand that this is how authoritarianism works.

 

What terrorist group? Name names.

Propaganda Alert!

Your post should be pulled, IMO.

 

Wealth Redistribution "IS" Socialism - by definition. There is no such thing as "Socialism" without wealth redistribution.

Which is why Red are bigger socialists than Blue over the last 40 years.

 

This is Peaceful ...



THIS is NOT ...



Questions?