Judge Orders New Election After 78 Percent of Mail-In Ballots Found Invalid, Notary Arrested

Notice the Leftists in this thread are on a constant Attack the Source Logical Fallacy, because they can't deal with the actual content of the thread.

 

This bit was left out of the OP

"Judge Weill also said there was clear evidence of voter intimidation and harassment at the polling place on election day. "

Probably all carried out by those on the right. Also left out in the OP was that there was no fraud carried out by those who voted by mail-in

 

Indeed. All the cries about voter fraud from the right are mostly projection.
My theory is that trump had lined up a voting day fraud scheme to flip a few critical precincts with the help of his cult but then the pandemic threw a spanner in the works by increasing mail in voting, and the trump gang were unable to fiddle those votes. That’s why he started bleating about voter fraud early on and tried to get his henchman at the USPS to screw the mail up.

 

This is not about voter fraud. This is about people messing around with votes behind the screen of the voter. People with ill will can and always be able to do this, regardless if it's done with mail in ballots or with regular ballots. And when the checks and balances work, they get caught.

And while voting is indeed banned in France, it is exceptionally normal to do in Germany and in the UK.

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/

Great way to flush your own credibility.

 

´ ~ There is this as well :

https://www.expressnews.com/news/lo...n-accused-of-election-fraud-gave-15994192.php

https://foxsanantonio.com/news/loca...e-peace-arrested-on-150-counts-of-voter-fraud

 

@Montoya @Daniel Light @Egoboy @cd8ed

Come on people I searched "Mississippi election fraud" and a couple local tv news outlets/papers covered it. Source shaming is just lazy posting.

https://www.wtva.com/content/news/Court-orders-new-run-off-election-in-Aberdeen-573896011.html

 

Just out of curiosity, why don't you @ the OP, who could have used your link that would potentially foster discussion over derision?? Providing a solid OP source is the responsibility of the thread starter, not the respondents...

Not much meat in your article either, but this sounds like election fraud (light) by one yokel, not that a single voter did anything wrong.

The OP trying to equate this to anything in the 2020 election is still laughable...

 

meaning what?

 

Trump and his followers claims of voter fraud is complete and utter nonsense.

 

Can you prove them wrong? ANS: No.

 

Can you prove you never murdered anyone ?

 

One thing I give the Europeans, they take the integrity of THEIR elections one hell of a lot more seriously than we do OURS.

 

No, but not one, let alone millions, have ever accused me either.

 

Can you prove that??

 

No, I suppose it is possible that 10 million people have accused me of murder, but I just never heard any of the accusations, which I can prove..

 

but I just never heard any of the accusations, which I can prove
Ok, how are you going to prove that

 

They validated 30 votes.......30 votes.......that is not the level of corruption you seek.

What she did was wrong and she should be prosecuted. But let's be honest here, there is literally no evidence that the votes were changed, or that they were actually illegal VOTES. They were thrown out because the process wasn't followed by the officials who counted the votes. So since there is no evidence that the votes themselves were illegal, or that they were changed, your story is just another red herring to your actual claims.

Epoch is just riling up the base with what is at a minimum sensationalism. The right in this country will do everything in their power to suppress the vote, and knowing that absentee voting is heavily democrat, will demonize it at all costs.

 

Ya Think?

You got it there, EB

Here is the the True Meaning (of WHY the OP was posted (in the 1st place)).

1) 66 Absentee Ballots (78% out of 84) in a Local Election were found to be "Invalid".

2) THUS, that means that 78% of the Absentee Ballots cast for President in 2020 Were INVALID!

Wake up Granny and the Kids, I wouldn't want anybody to miss this.

Yup, Sure Thing.

Gotta break out Fluffy for this one.

 

I skew right of the DNC on most of this voter stuff, but I think it is odd that they require people to have absentee ballots notarized. That could really put a hitch in elderly and handicapped people casting ballots. Seems like a couple witnesses should be enough. House calls by notary services ain't cheap in my area. Unless you are lucky enough to have an in-law or somebody at your church who is a notary who will do it for you for free, prices start around $125.00 just to show up and then $5/signature/document.

 

When the source isn’t even opened because of the obvious bias it is difficult to discuss it. The OP changing the title also led myself to ignore it.

No one is going to read a source from the KKK on black rights, don’t expect us to read them from obviously biased sources like this one either. I can tag you in all future posts where people immediately discuss the source instead of the data as it happens quite frequently, often by your team.

 

Just out of curiosity, which network or outlet did you turn to the most during the Russian hoax?

 

Providing meaningful contribution to a thread is the responsibility of users who reply to it. I didn't think 'lol that source I'm not reading it' counts, IMO.

 

Russian interference? Several. I actually like the news portion of Fox News along with Reuters. The BBC also had some thoughtful analysis.

Russian interference was proven btw

 

GIGO....