McConnell vows 'scorched earth' if Senate ends filibuster

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MJ Davies, Mar 17, 2021.

  1. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    McConnell vows 'scorched earth' if Senate ends filibuster

    Is McConnell just blowing smoke? Is it time to do away with filibusters?

    What do you think?
     
  2. balancing act

    balancing act Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2020
    Messages:
    4,125
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't care if they get rid of it or not, but there should be a rule that all legislation MUST be at least voted on in some finite time frame, so that not one or a few can hold up the entire congress from getting things done. If an issue doesn't have the votes, it doesn't make it. If they have the votes, it will pass. Too many Congressional actions have been essentially tabled by one person even when it seemed there were enough votes to pass it. At least there should be a vote and let the chips fall where they may.
     
    Mrs. b., Indlib, Marcotic and 4 others like this.
  3. cyndibru

    cyndibru Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Like him or hate him, I don't think McConnell blows a lot of smoke. He refused to end filibusters when Trump and and a lot of Trump supporters wanted him to when the GOP had the majority, so it doesn't surprise me that he wouldn't want to see it happen now. The minority protections exist in the Senate for very good reasons. He warned what the GOP would do if Reed and the Dems dropped from 60 to 51 for confirming judges, and he followed through. He would never have done that if the Dems hadn't made the opening salvo. If he's saying this now, I'd suggest they believe him. Those who complain about the difficulty of passing legislation due to Senate polarization are missing the bigger picture -- the ELECTORATE is highly polarized almost right down the middle, and the Senators reflect this. This will continue until some Senators on BOTH sides of the aisle decide to be Statesmen or Stateswomen and lead by example. I really hoped this was one area where Biden, with 40 years of legislative experience, most in the Senate, would be able to have some effect and help steer the Congress back to more bipartisan ways.

    Biden pledged bipartisanship, but when a group of 10 GOP senators came to him to wanting to have input and discussion on the covid relief bill to try to reach a bipartisan agreement, it was thanks but no thanks. If that's the way it's going to be, fine, but then don't run on the "we all need to come together" crap. If the Dems are going to keep trying to enact an agenda via reconciliation, etc just because they can, rather than negotiating in good faith to try and reach some compromises that would allow bipartisan support in certain areas, then don't expect the opposition to just say "ok fine, do whatever you want". Expect the opposition to be united and use every tool they have to stop it if they are not given any input, compromise, or even thrown a bone.
     
    Junkieturtle likes this.
  4. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that McConnell is garbage. What scorched earth policy is he talking about? They tried that with Obama. Blocked everything they could, even when it hurt their own voters. Obama was too nice of a guy to play their gutter politics. Biden learned the lessons from Obama’s presidency. That the Republicans are not honest brokers. Why try to negotiate a bill with them, when they are never going to vote for it anyways. I think that is what Biden told them, when he met with Republican congressional leaders, that they could either get on board, or be left out in the cold.

    McConnell has lost his power. His threats are mostly just bluster.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2021
  5. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    16,027
    Likes Received:
    7,551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm with Biden and Manchin on this one. Keep the filibuster, but make it so that a person has to actively speak in order for it to work.
     
  6. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ten Senators went to Biden and essentially told him that if the bill was reduced to the point where it would be ineffective, they would vote for it. Apparently Biden told them to go pound sand, and for good reason.
     
    Marcotic, 9royhobbs and MJ Davies like this.
  7. cyndibru

    cyndibru Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Not what I heard. They went with an opening offer for negotiation and discussion and were shut down completely. But spin away.
     
  8. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's my understanding the Republicans didn't want to compromise in a way that was mutually acceptable.
     
  9. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They had a plan that mostly gutted the bill.

    I have been reading Obama’s book, A Promised Land. In it he talks of the frustrations of dealing with a Republican bloc intent on trying to make him look bad. Democratic states like Colorado, Oregon, and Washington thrived throughout the Obama years, as those states readily embraced the stimulus efforts and the Affordable Care Act. Whereas Republican states throughout the country fell behind, refusing the help, in an effort to make Obama look bad.

    Biden seems to have learned very well, the lessons of Obama’s struggles. At first I had my reservations about Biden. But he is turning out to be a whole lot more LBJ like than I would have ever thought. But then, he did threaten to take the Trump out back and knock the stuffing out of him. And got away with it. He stood on the stage with the Trump, looked it the eyes and told it, that it was the worst president in the history of the United States, and told it, it had to go. Biden so unnerved the Trump, that the Trump had a breakdown, on national television. Unable to debate any further.
     
    Marcotic, Quantum Nerd and ChiCowboy like this.
  10. 9royhobbs

    9royhobbs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    15,052
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Scorched earth" is McConnell's move!!! Who is he kidding!!
     
  11. 9royhobbs

    9royhobbs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    15,052
    Likes Received:
    5,505
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From who? Hannity? Carlson?
     
    ImNotOliver and Marcotic like this.
  12. Lee S

    Lee S Moderator Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10,659
    Likes Received:
    2,635
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The political pendulum always swings both ways. It is a mistake to assume that the majority party will be in the majority tomorrow. When Harry Reid used the nuclear option and did away with the cloture rule, it ended up with what looks like a conservative majority on the Supreme Court for decades. With the cloture rule, the Democrats had the bargaining power to get infinitely more moderate Supreme Court judges than Kavanaugh Gorsuch and Barrett. Going nuclear led to a huge political disaster.

    I think getting rid of the fillibuster rule will be as disastrous as the getting rid of the cloture rule. Currently there is a tie in the Senate with the vice-president acting as a tie breaker, but the minority party traditionally loses seats in mid-term elections. Since the titular head of the Democratic Party is already seen by roughly half of all voters as being intellectually crippled by dementia, one would expect that there is a pretty decent chance that the Democrats will lose a greater number of Congressional seats than the 35 to 40 that one would tend to expect. Ending the fillibuster is probably not going to benefit the Democrats until the Senate tie is broken by a three or four seats margin, and it is much more likely that the Republicans are going to be able to take advantage of the loss of the filibuster first. This really has the chance of being a ruinous policy to the Democrats for not much advantage.
     
    cyndibru, Dutch and MJ Davies like this.
  13. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And who told him, I wonder?
     
    Mrs. b. and FatBack like this.
  14. cyndibru

    cyndibru Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It's my understanding that discussions and negotiations never got that far. Negotiation and compromise generally involves both sides having a starting point and making several incremental moves towards each other, not "I didn't like your initial offer, so we're done". Look, I get it. There was a lot of talk of bipartisanship, but in the end, what mattered more to Biden and the Dems was the optics of doing something fast, not taking the time for back and forth bi-partisan negotiation. I get "politics". I hate that the bill is loaded with a lot of stuff that isn't covid-related and costs a fortune, but that's the breaks and most people don't care because they're getting a payment. I don't blame them for going for their "win" while the iron is hot. But truly, if they continue to disregard campaign promises and don't take the time to attempt to negotiate for a reasonable amount of time in good faith on things like immigration and infrastructure, then everyone will know it was all just lip service and they won't have a leg to stand on to criticize the other side of the aisle.
     
    MJ Davies likes this.
  15. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,188
    Likes Received:
    33,087
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Kind of like saying we need to wait a year to hear from the will of the people on a SCOTUS nomination?

    There is no reason to negotiate with an entire party that has no goal but the destruction of government.

    Nuke the filibuster. Pass HR1. End gerrymandering
     
  16. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,442
    Likes Received:
    15,603
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The chinless maggot already scorched the earth when he refused to do his duty with Merrick Garland,
    so he can stuff his lying hypocrisy.
     
    ImNotOliver and Quantum Nerd like this.
  17. joesnagg

    joesnagg Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2020
    Messages:
    4,749
    Likes Received:
    6,799
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Go right ahead Democrats, nuke the filibuster.... but first verify the signature on that contract you must have with God that the Republicans will never hold the Senate again. What goes around comes around.
     
    Pycckia and FatBack like this.
  18. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,188
    Likes Received:
    33,087
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Can Republicans win without gerrymandering?
    Can they win with national absentee voting?

    And remember, you need the house, senate and presidency to do anything. The house could be completely removed from Republicans with a single rule change editing representation back to it’s intended levels.

    Maybe then the right can move from voter disenfranchisement to backing a third party so we can actually get some sane representation.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2021
  19. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Warnock and Ossoff say the Senate was yours. What happened? As far as the presidency goes, good luck with that. The country will be much different the next time a Republican has a shot at the White House. 16 years, minimum.
     
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  20. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    DEFinning and Quantum Nerd like this.
  21. Vote4Future

    Vote4Future Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    6,978
    Likes Received:
    3,554
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Getting rid of the filibuster will lead us to extremism, whether it be socialism or ultra-conservatism. I am for neither!
     
    cyndibru and CenterField like this.
  22. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biden isn't a socialist. Neither is Joe Manchin nor most of the Democratic caucus.
     
    Marcotic likes this.
  23. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,527
    Likes Received:
    11,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, McConnell isn't just blowing smoke, and in private at least he can be meaner than a junk yard dog. No, there is no good reason to eliminate the filibuster and do away with the appellation "the most deliberative body in the world." The only reason all options are on Schumer's table is he smells the sweet odor of Democrat totalitarianism, and that is far more appealing to him the anything akin to a constitutional republic.
     
    Mrs. b. and Tim15856 like this.
  24. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,527
    Likes Received:
    11,209
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, but it is an odd post. Your first phrase states you do not care one way or another, and the rest of your post explains why the filibuster must end.
     
  25. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Totalitarianism? Get real. Republicans got voted out by the people. Tough cookies. Trump should have stayed out of Georgia. That's where McConnell's anger should be directed.

    The Constitution allows the Senate to change the rules. It's because we're a constitutional republic that the filibuster is being challenged. It's being abused. Changing it is to prevent the tyranny of the minority. Read some history of South Africa if that's your thing. Majority rules in this country.
     
    ImNotOliver and Quantum Nerd like this.

Share This Page