ONSLAUGHT OF COURT CASES AGAINST TRUMP

Not this one. It is the only lawsuit to have been brought against a recent sitting PotUS. (You can't do that during their session-in-office.)

His "administration" ended on an invasion of Congress. Which has never occured in the history of the US.

And you're saying, "What's the beef"?

What planet to you live on? Go back there ...

 

"He"? I'm not sure of that! ;^)

 

Recent sitting? That's relevant? Former POTUS sued. So what? His admin ended exactly the way it started. Loony aunt Maxine, before the inauguration "impeach 45" ... Al Green "OK". What I'm saying is that Trump being sued isn't surprising no matter how hard you try and frame it as historically significant. I wager the claimants are just left wing virtue signalling narcissists, and this narrative your narrative is just Trump hating click bait.

 

Well, it is of an ex-PotUS - and one that has managed to stir-the-shat very willingly.

For that, I'd say he's unique - but so much better that he's gone. In the head ...

 

Can't handle it huh. Questions too tough for ya?

 

Trump's still "in the head" of lots of folks. ex -POTUS doesn't make it the least bit interesting. I think sitting POTUS Barack Obama being sued by a murdered border patrol agent's family was way more interesting.

 

Well, we differ on that one.

I happen to think that his worthless administration was the epitome of a useless presidency. And Americans should be convinced of such in order that it not happen again.

Or it will happen again, and again, and again. Ad nauseam.

Debate is senseless if there is not a subtle sense of wrong that must be righted. And there isn't - not with Donald Dork. His kind WILL try to be PotUS again, and again and again. Particularly amongst males, where the presidency in the most recognized prize - but the process is botched! (The simple fact that if the winning-vote is not the person you voted for, then Your Vote goes into the trash!)

It does not count in the sum-up of the popular-vote, which should be the only and ultimate definition of the winning candidate.

Howzat? Because the presidency should be won by the Aggregate Vote across the nation. And the Electoral College has a deep flaw - which the election of Donald Dork displayed amply. The loser of the nation's Popular-Vote won the presidency!

It was the Electoral College vote that made him, the looser, PotUS!

That outcome is pathetic! Voting the highest office in the land to the loser of the popular-vote should not be done in such an egregiously wrong manner ...

 

^^ Triggered ^^

 

I wonder how many times the story changes before you figure it all out. First it was white supremacists that stormed the capital, then these were all Trump supporters who were white supremacist, then these white supremacist beat a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher leaving a gash in his head as he was placed on life support, when that didn't pan out he was then killed with bear gas, when that didn't work out 5 people were killed during the riots trying to stop the insurrection, then we found out the people who died were actually rioters who died of heart attacks and one shot by police, then it was law enforcement officers w4ere killed during the insurrection, then we found out it was only one who died of natural causes, then AOC was hiding for her life in a closet at the capital being terrorized, when we found out she wasn't there at all it was rioters built gallows at the capital, then it was changed to built gallows near the capital, yet nobody during the impeachment trials knew anything about that, then we find out Democrats altered videos out of context to make a false claim, then we found out Democrats altered a twitter account to make a fake claim,

Do you normally fall for these kinds of CNN propaganda? How many times did the story change before you latched onto one of them?

Just an FYI, what did you call leftist storming the SCOTUS, beating on the doors, climbing on statues, and overtaking the grounds?
Wait, don't tell me, a peaceful demonstration.

 

Man, CNN has you hook line and sinker. And I love the cute little cutie names. How is that working out for ya?
Just an FYI, Trumps tax returns were subpoenaed for a grand jury. Sorry, no public viewing for you. lol
But I did notice you are still on the go get Trump team. With a batting average of 0/1000 over 5 years, I wouldn't hold my breath. lol

 

My story has not changed at all, I never blamed it on anyone other than Trump supporters. You know, the ones that threw the American flag on the ground so they could put up a Trump flag, such great patriots they are.

 

No Trump supporter would do that. You got propagandandized

Did you blame the BLM and Antifa members who were taking over Seattle, or was that a peaceful protest
Did you blame Democrats for the governance and hate speeches that lead to 8 months of riots, burning businesses, and killing Americans
Did you blame the local governance of 28 Democrat cities who refused to allow the NG to stop the riots
Did you blame BLM for assassinating cops in Dallas
Did you blame the Leftist who were beating on the doors of the SCOTUS trying to stop the appointment
Did you blame the left for bailing out rioters so they could burn and attack people again

Seems you have a one track agenda.

 

I watched it happen live, your denials are meaningless

 

I doubt that. And if you did, it wasn't Trump supporters doing it.
You can't provide a single Trump supporter on this forum or in the news that would desecrate the American flag. Thats what BLM and Antifa do and you already know that.
Thats what makes your claim BS.
If you can provide a video, I would be more than happy to watch it.

 

I didn't say your story changed. I asked which version did you decide to latch on to. And you have no video of any Trump supporter throwing the American flag on the ground.
Now you're just making claims up. But its typical from the hundreds of made up stories we have all heard thus far.

 

Dude . . . it's on video. Reality doesn't go away just because you don't like it. The facts don't care about your feelings.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=3819909768061784

 

Thank you for that, I was away from the computer for a minute

They also were not the only group to do it.

It happened more than once.

 

Ahhh, the old "No true Scotsman" fallacy...well played...

 

Nobody is stopping you from providing this video or broadcast of Trump supporters desecrating the American flag.
Why would that be so difficult to provide? Or is this just more propaganda banter?

 

Yeah, we saw the video of the guy dropping his hand held flag to another person on the ground. This is the supposed to be the video of Trump supporters desecrating the American flag?
I guess when its all ya got, its all ya got. Chalk this up to yet one of thousands of exaggerations propagated by the left. No different from the exaggerations Democrats got caught with falsifying evidence in the impeachment hearings. Par for the course.

 

They took down the American flag to put a Trump flag in its place.

And then used the other American flag to break into a window.

But it is good to know that you do not consider that to be desecrating the American flag. That says a great deal about you.

 

They were part of a pro-Trump mob and they desecrated the American flag in order to replace it for a Trump one, so yeah. If that isn't enough evidence for you, then you were never willing to be honest to begin with.

 

We have a winner folks!

 

Uh, the flag you said he was taking down, was on a hand held stick.
Yet another fake leftist claim bits the dust as per usual.

 

They took down the flag on the flagpole as well as throwing down the one on a stick. Though it is funny how you want to suddenly pretend that it is okay to desecrate the flag as long as it is one a short wooden stick instead of a long metal one.

Another fake response from a rightwinger desperately trying to recover after being given evidence that they were wrong bites the dust, as per usual.