So if time was of the essence, you'd prefer a bureaucratic process over a competent and militarily trained individual making the right decision?
Again your opinion, not supported by fact and dodging the reason for the General's action. Discuss the elephant in the room. Even if Biden were totally mad that has absolutey no effect on what Millay did, when he did it, and why he did it.
I had no such concerns of a nuclear war on the day of the 6th, that's the very last thing that was on my mind or even on Trump's mind. The Madam Speaker and General Milley colluded, and now I wish to know the extent of that conspiracy between the two of them, what was said and when it was said between them. How much of our civilian government still remains, a civilian government?
Ahhh the good ole ends justifies the means argument. One of the single most dangerous ideologies in human history.
People like the leftists here and Milley himself 1) have the burden of proof to show mental decline, and 2) show that Trump was going to launch nukes against China. Get busy with that. Milley isn't Jack Ryan in a Tom Clancy book. As for Biden, his mental decline is obvious.
Milley wasn't trying to remove tRump from office. He was trying to protect the world and his CIC from himself.
I don't think that the cons are missing the point at all. I think that they are desperate to distract from the point that has already been made in history, namely that trump tried to overturn an election he lost and incited his cult to stage an insurrection. They can't wipe the stain of trump from the public consciousness, so they resort to attacking everyone who reminds people what a criminal, sick miscreant occupied the White House for 4 years.
The statement was made by a sitting president. The absurd statement of Noone was obviously intended as fact.
But you still can’t answer the question “if” he did it…. A hearsay conversation from 2 reporters from fake news WaPo book is not admissible in any court.