Rittenhouse Judge receives ‘thousands’ of vile messages and death threats - LIB MEDIA ARE SILENT!

yep, the OJ jury saw it different too, did they say the victims was a bad person too, nope, they just said not enough proof to convict

 

Absolutely no correlation. Everything was on tape. Clear cut evidence. They were perpetrators, not victims and they all three were white with criminal records. (that is unless you don't consider the rape of five male juveniles criminal)

 

the jury said nothing about the victims in this case, if they did, show me a quote

that is like saying if a jury finds a man not guilty of rape, that they are calling the rape victim a bad person.... not the way it works

 

Left wing media calls them victims and the judge would not allow the prosecution use such a loaded word.

 

that's right. They were called rioters, not victims. Only the prosecutors wanted to portray them as victims.

 

"Provoke somebody to a murderous rage"?

Odd that you blame somebody else for another actions.

Second, what exactly did he do to provide them? Oppose their desire to roll a burning dumpster into a service station?

 

Exactly right.

And then when things are a mess, they claim the system has failed and we need to accept their version if utopia for fix the issues. It's all part of the play.

 

they were victims

 

So you think someone ALREADY CONVICTED IN THE PAST OF RAPE is exhonerated and reborn as a very nice person by another trial later in time where they are attacking someone that shoots them in self defense? Really? OK... if you say so.

 

A volunteer EMT is a professional?

 

A VOLUNTEER EMT has to meet all the certifications and qualifications of a PAID EMT. He/she just isn't PAID.

I spent a year on staff with about 1200 American civilian firefighters in Iraq. Back home, most were in VOLUNTEER FIRE departments and VOLUNTEERED for duty in Iraq. In Iraq they did the same things as back home, but were PAID for it. Whether back home or in Iraq, they all had met the same certifications and qualifications to EARN THE TITLE "FIREFIGHTER".

 

Wouldn't it be reasonably common for first aid people to be referred to as "EMT", even if not technically correct?

 

Then why is it only illegal because of the proximity to a school? Obviously it's not seen as dangerous in any other context!

 

So because he shouldn't have been there with a gun, this means that he should have been found guilty?

 

Okay, so not NBC NATIONAL.

That's a news aggregator, linking to even Fox News. NOTHING to do with NBC/MSNBC NEWS.

Really? Can you link to the Forbes article? I can't find it even when searching "Forbes kyle rittenhouse judge threats." Although because I'm not in the US,
my search results will be different. Anyway, I'd hardly call Forbes mainstream national media.

 

Yes. What's your point?

 

And in the Rittenhouse case?

 

Possessing a gun does not "create danger" any more than driving a car or having a knife. Rittenhouse provoked nothing. If you believe he did, never pick up a rock again... never handle a shovel again... never light a fire again... you would be "provoking danger".

 

That would be like calling a newspaper delivery boy.... a "journalist'. "EMT" is a TITLE that indicates certain skills and qualifications.

 

Well no, because a newspaper delivery boy doesn't do ANYTHING that a journalist does.

 

Your hypocrisy. The issue you're actually raising, of selected reporting to support an underlying bias, applies across the media regardless of political lean (perceived or actual). The irony is that your only calling out "liberal" media for it is a classic example of such selective reporting.

 

Because the liberal media is the only media which didn't cover it.

 

A newspaper delivery boy handles papers. So there IS a connection to journalism. A "first aid person" (whatever THAT is... my mom could handle a band-aid... does THAT count?) is what? An EMT is skilled. Really skilled. An EMT saved my wife's life... resuscitated her when she couldn't breathe. Worked on her for twenty minutes with equipment in the ambulance. Could a "first aid person" do that? Soldiers receive formal first aid in Basic Training... and couldn't.

 

Alright, but you acknowledge that someone skilled in CPR could save someone's life in a situation less serious than your wife's?

 

Yup. But someone who can afix a band aid is NOT AN MD. Someone who knows how to use tampons is not an OB GYN. Someone that can take blood pressure is not a Cardiac Surgeon. Someone who can give you a pain killing aspirin is not an Anesthesiologist. And someone skilled in CPR is NOT AN EMT. In every state I am aware of, the certification to be an EMT requires a state license.