You say Rittenhouse would've been found guilty if black...

People with the same level of melanin as Rittenhouse have come out in droves to give him financial and moral support, job offers and access to all kinds of resources. Anybody that kills "them" is considered "heroic" and will NEVER be outcasts in this country.

 

No I don't see what you mean in order to do that I would need to depart from logic and common Sense.

First of all, thanks to the weapon he had writtenhouse is no victim.

Second of all the good old days are in the past where they belong.

And thirdly it's the social justice warrior types usually white Democrats, who feel the need to fabricate something where it does not exist.

Racism low in supply yet so high in demand.

And finally to move on to my fourth point that's a nice opinion you have here perhaps you should start a thread about that one...

However this thread is specifically about the people who claim that have written house was black he would have been convicted.

Do you have any thoughts on you know the actual topic of the thread?

 

You're right there is no comparison you can't even find one example.

 

Did you take an inventory of everyone that gave him moral and financial support or you just making assumptions to support your confirmation biases?

 

If Rittenhouse were black and being attacked by three white guys he would never have been charged,

 

OJ killed his wife and the other guy in self defense?

 

the jury disagreed - thus my point

 

I remember that case. Didn't know that it had gotten that far to be honest. Glad he was acquitted. At the time I had figured that it was a case of self-defense for both him and the cops in question.

 

There was no self defense claim in the OJ trial. He never admitted to killing them and then pled she was trying to kill him and the other guy jumped in so he had to kill them to save his own life. Stop with desperate attempts to convict Rittenhouse we actually SAW what happened.

 

Gee, I didn’t see anything about this on cnn or msnbc anyone care to guess why they aren’t talking about this case? Something about not fitting into their racist agenda.

keep it up cnn, msnbc, abc, pbs. Americans are on to you. Come 2022 elections the jokes on you.

 

the jury found OJ not guilty of even killing her, Kyle's just found him not guilty due to self-defense

 

Apples and peanuts.

 

nope, just juries making judgement, sometimes they get it right, sometimes not

 

Interesting. What makes you say that?

 

Do you think Kyle might be found guilty in civil court, the same way OJ was?

 

he might, we will have to wait and see

 

The facts and charges apples and concrete.

 

You are probably right, that is the way things probably are, but I disagree and do not think it should be that way.

 

Correct. A black would be Hung on the spot.

 

same thing, if one is gonna claim not guilty means innocent, it applies to both cases

 

agree, it's double jeopardy imo, but that is what happens it seems

 

I wonder how these people lived so long attacking a person with rocks, skateboard, etc. A person with a rifle. Must have been some good stuff they were on or their brain quit functioning long before that.

 

I'm hearing a lot of this case relative to Kyle:

https://www.npr.org/2021/10/08/1044...exas-timberview-high-school-shooting-released

Black student shoots 4 defenseless students and a teacher who had not attacked him. Bail is low, charges low as well.

The guy who ran over the 5 grannies and killed a child with his SUV? 50 pages of rap sheets. He'd been out on $1K bail. $5 Million now thankfully, but why any? He's an obvious danger to the community at any price.

The idea that the law is tougher on black people than white seems untenable. The one stat I'm looking for: been some time but I used to hear the race of the alleged perp matters less than that of the victim. We may be too easy on those who attack black people, regardless of race.

 

Weak Prosecution
Weak Judge
Improperly moved from West Los Angeles to downtown district.

OJ's trial was a sham!


Moi

​

 

Clear case of self defense. I believe everyone, including the judge, knew this, except for CNN. I was amazed it took the jury so long. Glad they were careful though.

Since we're playing what-ifs, what if Ahmaud Arbery had had a gun to defend himself? Would it have been ok that he do that? Or, as our anti-Rittenhouse friends seem to believe, would that have just been nasty and he should just let those guys kill him?

I'll answer that; of course it would have been ok.