Rittenhouse Judge receives ‘thousands’ of vile messages and death threats - LIB MEDIA ARE SILENT!

1) I correctly stated that Rosenbaum threw a plastic bag at him and was ranting like the lunatic he was. Everyone else that Rosenbaum was screaming at either ignored him or shoved him out of their face. Little Kyle however was scared of the little nut and ended up shooting him 4 times. That’s why scared little immature punks should not be parading around the streets with loaded weapons. That’s where we get back to the real point of who the hell bought this little nit with the kool gun, loaded it up with a 30 round clip and dragged him into the situation that caused this whole deal.

2) Yes, anybody who is experienced knows not to engage in a pissing contest with a crazy man. This guy was running around screaming and threatening everybody within earshot all night. That’s what crazy people do. Everyone else just ignored him or shoved him away. But only one guy, the little punk with the kool gun found it necessary to pump 4 bullets into an unarmed nut then run away like a thief in the night.

 

Pursuing an armed man who had just killed someone and was running away, still armed....Perhaps they were trying to prevent him from killing more people. Disarming a loose cannon like that and holding him for the police could be considered a courageous and noble act in some circles.

 

Why must folks like you always assign false, extreme positions on guns to folks like me when we point out the insanity of legally allowing people to parade around the streets of the US with loaded semi-automatic weapons? The fact is an ambiguously written constitutional amendment has been grotesquely distorted from its original intent.

 

Who gives ****? Now you are just parsing words. I consider a weapon with a 30 round clip an assault rifle. What else is it for?

 

Then you’d agree that the death of Ahmaud Arbery was justified, because all they were doing was trying to detain a thief running from a crime waiting for the cops to show up? Who expects an innocent man out on a friendly jog, to attack you when all you were doing was following him or “chasing” after him over a misunderstanding. It’s not like they just shot him in the back without even talking to him first.

Just using your logic.

 

You went further than that previously, saying that the plastic bag is the reason that Kyle killed him!

Look, I'm WAY too good at this, so you might as well give up while you still can!

So Kyle STARTED the "pissing contest?"

 

He and his campaign solicited and welcomed electoral help from a foreign adversary he knew had stolen material from a DNC server. https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-reports-findings-on-collusion/
His associate, Roger Stone, coordinated the dissemination of said material with Wikileaks.
Hillary pointing out that, in her opinion, the things described above made Don an illegitimate prez did not preclude her from conceding the election, or wishing Don success. Nor does it mean Democrats joined her in her assessment as you claimed.

 

The difference is that Rittenhouse WAS armed and had just killed a man. Arbury was NOT armed and had not committed ANY crime when those 3 ignorant cracker hoo rahs chased him down a hootin’ and a hollerin’ and murdered him in cold blood....See what I mean? You are a fvcking riot!!!


Arbury attacked those poor crackers....LOL...Priceless...Musings of a sick twisted mind..

 

The point is that you specified "MILITARY assault rifle" demonstrating that you know nothing about guns, just like all other Californian liberals!

 

What does any of this have to do with "SELF-defense?" Keyword "SELF!"

 

You are the worst at this but you like your hero Trump are a legend in your own mind. You are an evasive little nitpicker who never makes a cogent point in any of your posts. You just slime around ducking, dodging and moving the goalposts at every turn.

 

PERFECT!

 

LOL, you said a ‘military assault rifle’.

 

If one is in a crowd and a man has just shot and killed a man who then runs away, attacking him in order to disarm him is self defense as well as defense of others. I am sure this will all be brought up at Rittenhouse’s civil wrongful death trail.

 

Who cares champ. What is the difference between an AR 15 and a military assault rifle?

 

A lot but I don’t expect you to know the difference between a semi-automatic and a select fire weapon.

 

So you're making a 'crime vs non-crime' distinction between Rittenhouse and Arbery. You're correct that Arbery did not commit a crime, but what crime did Rittenhouse commit exactly?

When did @Pred say that Arbery attacked those guys?

 

It's VERY simple! See below for some REALITY!

"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download[/QUOTE]

Oh, so no Democrats challenged the Congressional counting of electoral votes?

 

Are you saying, hypothetically, anyone who approaches a person with a gun who has just shot someone, with the intent of disarming the shooter, can legally be shot under the guise of self defense?

 

Typical Californian liberal!

 

Not at all. It's just that the 'hero' who is trying to stop the 'active shooter' had better be DAMN sure that they are ACTUALLY an active shooter. Do you seriously not make a distinction between Rittenhouse and the Las Vegas shooter?

 

The POTENTIAL defense of others, sure, but how can it be SELF defense if the person is running away from you? Also, do you make a distinction between Rittenhouse and the Las Vegas shooter?

 

Yet that doesn't prove your assertion nor does it disprove mine. Mueller appropriately set the bar of evidence very high in order to show the existence of a criminal conspiracy. Evidence the facts of the investigation would have revealed had Roger Stone not refused to tell the truth. Remember, Mueller noted his investigation was stymied by witnesses refusal to testify as to what they did. The former Liar-in-Chief among them. As a reward for Stone's lack of cooperation Trump rewarded him with a pardon. Yet another abuse of trump's pardon power.

 

You are right, I don’t really give a damn about any of that stuff so I may have used the wrong term. However that does not change the fact that some moron bought an AR 15 for this little punk because he thought “it looked kool” then he loaded it up with a 30 round clip and brought him into a quasi war zone. Predictively, the scared little punk ended up killing and maiming people and could very well have gotten himself killed. What this imbecile did seems like it should be illegal and constitutes gross negligence, child endangerment and makes that idiot responsible for any wrongful death claims by the families of those who were killed or maimed. So hopefully as a result of this shitshow, people will not go into gun stores and buy guns for kids load em up and take them to riots in the future. That’s the proverbial moral of this whole story.

 

ULTRA deflection! Try again. So Kyle STARTED the "pissing contest?" And you clearly no longer stand behind your claim that the plastic bag is the reason that Kyle killed the pile of human waste child rapist!