‘30-Day Survival Challenge’: Canadian YouTuber Charged With Violating National Park Act

DennisTate · Feb 13, 2022

Where is my nation, Canada, headed?????

On December 1, 2021 I was put on Unpaid Administrative Leave from the job that I had for ten years......
but that would not cause me to take the Bill Gates / Tony Fauci / P. M. Trudeau vaccines......
so I retired......
now it seems that some high level people want survivalism in any form to be illegal on national parks??????

‘30-Day Survival Challenge’: Canadian YouTuber Charged With Violating National Park Act
February 9, 2022 | By Jilli Cluff

Parks Canada is charging B.C. native Gregory Ovens and American Zachary Fowler with unlawfully fishing, hunting, discharging firearms, lighting fires, damaging natural objects, and operating a drone inside Banff National Park.

You might know self-proclaimed survivalists Gregory Ovens and Zachary Fowler from The History Channel’s “Alone” or YouTube. The two met in 2016 while filming the survival reality series in Patagonia. Fowler won that season and walked away with a $500K cash prize.

Three years later, the pair began churning out wilderness survival content on YouTube. In that time, Ovens’ channel, Rocky Mountain Bushcraft, has garnered more than half a million subscribers and nearly 50 million views.

Now they’re facing legal action over violations that took place while filming their self-produced “30-Day Survival Challenge” in 2019. They’ll each have to dole out CAD 140,000 ($110,500) in fines if found guilty.
Click to expand...

I have the impression that America's President Biden is NOT on the side of the American people... and it seems to me that Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is also NOT on the side of ordinary Canadians?????

DennisTate · Feb 13, 2022

I am hopeful that nine point four million Israelis may be
willing to soon rise up against Bill (Goliath Brain) Gates and bring down the scheme
that sure looks like an Elitist bias against ordinary people being free to do what they like doing in regards to proving that it is possible for many of us to
go back toward living like many of our parents or grandparents lived for at least part of their lives!

Dennis Patrick Tate

....... , Sherbrooke, N. S., B0J3C0

and now:

................. , Mississauga, Ontario, L5M0X1

February 8, 2022

Employment Insurance Commission

Processing and Payment Services.

Thank you for your letter dated January 21, 2022 letting me know of your decision in my case. I do wish to appeal this decision for several reasons.

1. My employer, the Strait Regional Centre for Education, WAS NOT PERMITTED by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his office to offer me a reasonable accommodation for my decision to NOT take the Covid 19 vaccinations. For example, if I had been offered a different schedule such as four pm to midnight I would have accepted. If I had been offered to work from seven pm to three am I would have accepted but my employer was not permitted to offer me any sort of accommodation. My employer made this clear in the correspondence that I did include with my application for Employment Insurance benefits. I will forward a copy of this message to my former employer and they can verify that this assertion is indeed true.

2. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has not attained INFALLABILITY and is not yet in the position of His Holiness Pope Francis over Canada. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is clearly following the wishes of his friend Mr. Bill Gates in far too obedient a manner, (I could even say obsequious), which I feel puts him in violation of THE NUREMBURG CODES!

All government officials in Canada who follow P. M. Justin Trudeau in doing what Mr. Bill Gates wants done are also risking being in violation of The Nuremburg Codes. Actually, the evidence is mounting that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was one important little pawn in a plan to divert not merely billions of dollars, (but actually TRILLIONS of dollars worldwide), from taxpayers to the companies that had produced the vaccines. The first step in this process was to hide the truth about there being far better treatments for Covid 19 than the vaccines.

I personally take zinc, D3, absorbable C and 3000 plus mg of MSM most days, and I found the Omicron Variant so mild that I could not believe that this was actually what all the fuss was about these past two years????? Dr. John Campbell stated in a video that eighty to ninety percent of people in England and Scotland would be exposed to Omicron in January and February of 2022 so any attempt to continue with a Vaccine Mandate is like a practical joke on thirty seven point six million Canadians!!

"Nuremburg codes stipulate that consent must be voluntary.
Telling a child that they cannot go to school, firing people from work, or preventing their travel is NOT voluntary consent.
Threatening someone's livelihood unless they take an experimental vaccine is NOT voluntary consent." (Candace Owens, 7,7, 2021, 4:04 pm, Twitter for iPhone)

..... DR. Syed Haider .... "My experience using ivermectin and fluvoxamine in 4000 acute COVID-19 patients: 5 hospitalized. 0 dead. 4000 recovered. 5 pharmacist threats. 1 medical board complaint. 1 lawyer retained. Hundreds of medication transfers for pharmacist refusals." (Dr. Syed Haider, 10:35 AM, 21 OCTOBER 21, TWITTER FOR IPHONE)

Do you know what the charge would be against physicians and bureaucrats who knowingly would cooperate with a plan to suppress the truth about far better ways of treating Covid 19 than the vaccines?

Crimes Against Humanity could well be the charge that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may soon be facing...... so no wonder he is using all of his considerable influence over media and bureaucrats to try to stop what Canada's truckers are attempting to teach officials in Ottawa.

Thank you for reconsidering my application for Employment Insurance benefits and for the record I am now living in Mississauga and I have been hired full time by .... building supplies. .... is unlikely to attempt to enforce any type of Covid 19 vaccine mandate.

Dennis Tate
Click to expand...

Should Israelis begin discussion of a Class Action Lawsuit against Bill Gates?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...inst-bill-gates.591367/page-2#post-1073250021

I personally think that the trucker convoy that has landed in Ottawa could well lead to the indictments of Bill Gates... Tony Fauci... and eventually even P. M. Justin Trudeau.....
so it is logical that Trudeau is using every trick in the book to attempt to stop the truckers from stopping him and his buddies.....
from fulfilling their objectives that to a degree seem to be based on Malthusian Catastrophe Theory!?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism

This event, called a Malthusian catastrophe (also known as a Malthusian trap, population trap, Malthusian check, Malthusian crisis, Malthusian spectre, or Malthusian crunch) occurs when population growth outpaces agricultural production, causing famine or war, resulting in poverty and depopulation.
Click to expand...

"Neo-Malthusianism" is a concern that overpopulation as well as overconsumption may increase resource depletion and/or environmental degradation will lead to ecological collapse or other hazards.[citation needed]

The rapid increase in the global population of the past century exemplifies Malthus's predicted population patterns; it also appears to describe socio-demographic dynamics of complex pre-industrial societies. These findings are the basis for neo-Malthusian modern mathematical models of long-term historical dynamics.[33]

There was a general "neo-Malthusian" revival in the mid-to-late 1940s, continuing through to the 2010s after the publication of two influential books in 1948 (Fairfield Osborn's Our Plundered Planet and William Vogt's Road to Survival). During that time the population of the world rose dramatically. Many in environmental movements began to sound the alarm regarding the potential dangers of population growth.[1] In 1968, ecologist Garrett Hardin published an influential essay in Science that drew heavily from Malthusian theory. His essay, "The Tragedy of the Commons", argued that "a finite world can support only a finite population" and that "freedom to breed will bring ruin to all."[34] The Club of Rome published a book entitled The Limits to Growth in 1972. The report and the organisation soon became central to the neo-Malthusian revival.[35] Paul R. Ehrlich has been one of the most prominent neo-Malthusians since the publication of The Population Bomb in 1968. Leading ecological economist Herman Daly has acknowledged the influence of Malthus on his concept of a steady-state economy.[36]: xvi Other prominent Malthusians include the Paddock brothers, authors of Famine 1975! America's Decision: Who Will Survive?

The neo-Malthusian revival has drawn criticism from writers who claim the Malthusian warnings were overstated or premature because the green revolution has brought substantial increases in food production and will be able to keep up with continued population growth.[16][37] Julian Simon, a cornucopian, has written that contrary to neo-Malthusian theory, Earth's "carrying capacity" is essentially limitless.[1] Simon argues not that there is an infinite physical amount of, say, copper, but for human purposes that amount should be treated as infinite because it is not bounded or limited in any economic sense, because: 1) known reserves are of uncertain quantity 2) New reserves may become available, either through discovery or via the development of new extraction techniques 3) recycling 4) more efficient utilization of existing reserves (e.g., "It takes much less copper now to pass a given message than a hundred years ago." [The Ultimate Resource 2, 1996, footnote, page 62]) 5) development of economic equivalents, e.g., optic fibre in the case of copper for telecommunications. Responding to Simon, Al Bartlett reiterates the potential of population growth as an exponential (or as expressed by Malthus, "geometrical") curve to outstrip both natural resources and human ingenuity.[38] Bartlett writes and lectures particularly on energy supplies, and describes the "inability to understand the exponential function" as the "greatest shortcoming of the human race".

Prominent neo-Malthusians such as Paul Ehrlich maintain that ultimately, population growth on Earth is still too high, and will eventually lead to a serious crisis.[13][39] The 2007–2008 world food price crisis inspired further Malthusian arguments regarding the prospects for global food supply.[40]

From approximately 2004 to 2011, concerns about "peak oil" and other forms of resource depletion became widespread in the United States, and motivated a large if short-lived subculture of neo-Malthusian "peakists".[41]

A United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization study conducted in 2009[42] said that food production would have to increase by 70% over the next 40 years, and food production in the developing world would need to double[43] to feed a projected population increase from 7.8 billion to 9.1 billion in 2050. The effects of global warming (floods, droughts, and other extreme weather events) are expected to negatively affect food production, with different impacts in different regions.[44][45] The FAO also said the use of agricultural resources for biofuels may also put downward pressure on food availability.[46]
Click to expand...

Kranes56 · Feb 13, 2022

What is it with anti-vaxxefs think that being punished and breaking laws is okay? Is it just me or have anti-vaxxers become more okay with criminal activity lately?

DennisTate · Feb 13, 2022

Kranes56 said: ↑

What is it with anti-vaxxefs think that being punished and breaking laws is okay? Is it just me or have anti-vaxxers become more okay with criminal activity lately?
Click to expand...

Good question.....
and I must concede the point that many of my ancestors and distant relatives all across Canada and the USA over the past four centuries did behave rather terribly......
which brings us to the uncomfortable question as to whether or not Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau may actually have saved the world environment by brilliantly slowing down the
Canadian economy after 1974..... which set the stage for the slowing down of the USA economy..... and the world economy...... which could be argued may have saved the environment from the human tendency to go into OVERCONSUMPTIONISM????!

Did P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau save the world environment?

?
Does deliberately slowing down the economy tend to save the environment?

No
2 vote(s)
66.7%

*
Yes
1 vote(s)
33.3%

I suppose it would suppose on how the economy is slowed...
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Change Your Vote

DennisTate said: ↑

I got a really cool word for you that tends to back up the idea that indeed.....
back in 1974 P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau may well have deliberately set in motion a dampening of
the economy of Canada..... which set the stage for a similar dampening of the
economy of the USA.... which of course would have tended to slow down the
entire world economy and the key word is Neo - Malthusianism.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...writings-as-art.534297/page-2#post-1070726064
Click to expand...

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...the-world-environment.558261/#post-1073159547

Did P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau save the world environment?

DennisTate said: ↑

Deplorables....
very much like my ancestors and cousins all across Canada and America grievously
offended many English and European aristocrats who were concerned about the environment as we
participated in the extinction of the Passenger Pigeon...... (just for one example).......

I plead guilty.....
I and my ancestors and our relatives did play a role in the shooting, trapping, frying, boiling and barbecuing of the Passenger Pigeon into extinction ......
so it is no wonder that the English Aristocrats.... (who know of ways to influence French Canadian political leaders).......
would tend to think that if there were too many of us Deplorables that we would destroy the environment on them and their grandchildren!

ONCE WE CAN TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY.... PLEAD GUILTY IN SOME WAY TO AT LEAST A PART OF A PROBLEM....
THEN AND ONLY THEN ARE WE EMPOWERED TO ADDRESS THAT PROBLEM!!!!

https://www.audubon.org/magazine/may-june-2014/why-passenger-pigeon-went-extinct

Why the Passenger Pigeon Went Extinct
And whether it can, and should, be brought back to life a century after it disappeared.
Click to expand...

https://bettysearlyedition.blogspot.com/2015/07/how-pierre-trudeau-turned-us-into-debt.html

The Bank of Canada was first established by Prime Minister Richard Bennet in 1935 as a private central bank, but was then nationalized by William Lyon Mackenzie King in 1938. By nationalizing the bank, Mackenzie King meant for it to belong to the people so the Canadian government could borrow funds with little or no interest for capital expenditures. The mandate of the newly nationalized Bank of Canada was to act as the banker to the government and to manage the public debt. As Mackenzie King famously said: “Once a nation parts with the control of their currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.”

So the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and the government could now borrow money with little or no interest. And it worked. The Canadian government built freeways, public transportation systems, subway line, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway and funded a national health care system and the Canada Pension Plan. But then Trudeau, under the influence of the international financial group called Basel’s
Committee’s Recommendations (The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) made the decision to halt the borrowing of money from the Bank of Canada, and instead, chose to borrow from the private banks who instead of lending to the government at no interest, or low interest, introduced higher interest rates along with compound interest.

All banks know very well the magic of compound interest. And Pierre Trudeau must have known that the mounting compounded national debt would lead to Canadians eventually owing a dollar fifty for every dollar of their disposable incomes. After all, he studied economics at the London School of Economics. Surely the professors there knew about compound interest.

So Pierre Trudeau, instead of feeling blessed that Canada, unlike the US, had a nationalized central bank, signed our bank away to the private banks. Couldn’t Trudeau, such an educated man, surmise that citizens in a few years would be struggling to make car payments and meet rent and mortgages and student loans and to buy healthy food while last year’s profits for the big five (that’s Royal Bank, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal and CIBC amounted to $31.7 billion?) If he did, he didn’t care. But it doesn’t have to be this way. It really doesn’t. Our Bank of
Canada is still there. Next time." (Ms. Betty Krawczyk)
Click to expand...

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...better-canada-contest.589554/#post-1072743293

Best Idea for a Better Canada Contest

DennisTate said: ↑

A serious error was made by Canadian Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau in 1974 that allowed for a major deception to occur in The United States of America. Once the error is corrected in Canada the same error will be easily understood in how it affected the economy of the United States of America over the last nearly five decades.

My theory is that the rather brilliant Bank of Canada policy that was in effect from 1938 to 1974 was too intelligent and logical and had to be messed up so that a deception could be pulled on Americans.... but the deception had to be pulled off on all Canadians first!

Both of these graphs can be viewed here:
https://famguardian.org/Publications/InThisAgeOfPlenty/plenty34.htm
Click to expand...

Kranes56 · Feb 13, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

Good question.....
and I must concede the point that many of my ancestors and distant relatives all across Canada and the USA over the past four centuries did behave rather terribly......
which brings us to the uncomfortable question as to whether or not Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau may actually have saved the world environment by brilliantly slowing down the
Canadian economy after 1974..... which set the stage for the slowing down of the USA economy..... and the world economy...... which could be argued may have saved the environment from the human tendency to go into OVERCONSUMPTIONISM????!

Did P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau save the world environment?

?
Does deliberately slowing down the economy tend to save the environment?

No
2 vote(s)
66.7%

*
Yes
1 vote(s)
33.3%

I suppose it would suppose on how the economy is slowed...
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Change Your Vote

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...the-world-environment.558261/#post-1073159547

Did P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau save the world environment?

https://bettysearlyedition.blogspot.com/2015/07/how-pierre-trudeau-turned-us-into-debt.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...better-canada-contest.589554/#post-1072743293

Best Idea for a Better Canada Contest
Click to expand...

Are you derailing your own thread?

DennisTate · Feb 13, 2022

Kranes56 said: ↑

Are you derailing your own thread?
Click to expand...

I am trying my best to cover both sides to this whole question......
which is very different from the tactics of a reporter who is trying to sell one particular idea or stream of thought!

Kranes56 · Feb 13, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

I am trying my best to cover both sides to this whole question......
which is very different from the tactics of a reporter who is trying to sell one particular idea or stream of thought!
Click to expand...

In a thread about people squatting in the woods…you’re talking about fiscal policy.

HonestJoe · Feb 13, 2022

Kranes56 said: ↑

Are you derailing your own thread?
Click to expand...

It is literally all he does. His threads typically have no replies other than his own obscure tangents because most of us have long realised that you are wasting your time trying to have any kind of discussion with him.

Log in or Sign up

‘30-Day Survival Challenge’: Canadian YouTuber Charged With Violating National Park Act

Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau against ordinary Canadians even surviving if they disobey him???

No

Yes

I think that DennisTate is a paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorist!!!!

Well.... Malthusian Catastrophe Theory does have some logic in it!

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

‘30-Day Survival Challenge’: Canadian YouTuber Charged With Violating National Park Act

Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau against ordinary Canadians even surviving if they disobey him???

No

Yes

I think that DennisTate is a paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorist!!!!

Well.... Malthusian Catastrophe Theory does have some logic in it!

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kranes56 Banned

HonestJoe Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches