We don’t talk about Hispanic, Transgender murderers here

Wearing makeup doesn’t make one a granny. Is Trump a tranny?

 

That wasn’t my only reasoning was it?

Let me put it this way. If you told an FBI Profiler that the suspect was depressed, psychotic, engaged in self harming and suicidal behaviors and wore make up to school and was picked on because of his clothing.

A transgender or crossdresser would be at the VERY top of his list.

 

The bolded part; what evidence do you have of trans people being violent towards others? Self-harm, sure. Usually, they are the victims. Being the victim of hate is usually the MO of homophobes, to which your dialog sounds very similar to it.

 

Right, because it’s a really obvious feature, unlike depression.

same goes if you replaced make up with, white, black, Asian, male, female, in a wheelchair, missing an arm, etc.

wearing makeup is not a mental disorder.

 

30-50% of Transgender people experience interpartner violence whereas heterosexuals experience it at around 20%.

 

No idea what that means. How about linking it to a source to figure out what point you think you're making.

 

Transgenders are far more likely that anyone else to partner with another transgender. Why? Because they’re HIGHLY likely to be rejected by every other group. Upwards of 97% by heterosexual males.

Which means their domestic violence, many times is originating from another trans person.

But given their grossly disproportionate rates of mental disorders that occur along with being transgender, I’m not sure why that’s surprising to you.

 

Again, no source link. You're just pulling these numbers out of your ass and have no context to support it.

 

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/ipv-sex-abuse-lgbt-people/

you wanna try again?

I’ll add ALL of the LGBTQ groups experience inter partner violence more often than heterosexuals. Weird huh? It’s almost like they have a mental disorder.

 

So . . . even less topical than previously assumed? K.

 

I’ll point out she still hasn’t denied it. I’ll give her props for being honest enough to not even want to lie about it on an anonymous forum. So kudos to her for that.

But I was right. And why was I right? Because stereotypes are stereotypes for a REASON.

Stereotypes didn’t just pop into existence out of nowhere. They occur because of a pattern of behavior within certain types of people. Those patterns of behavior indicate a certain type of person. Now does it mean it will ALWAYS be true? Of course not. But stereotypes are stereotypes because more often than not they are true.

It’s true, white dudes can’t jump. Are there some who can jump higher than Lebron and do a 360 alley oop? Absolutely but as a rule, that’s not the case.

It’s true Jews are intelligent and good with money. Now are there some Jews who are broke ass poor and half retarded? Absolutely but as a rule that’s not the case.

It’s true New Yorkers are rude. Now can you find a highly polite welcoming New Yorker? Of course. But as a rule that’s not the case.

And if your husband likes mani pedis, gets his toenails painted and would like to paint his fingernails and he wears womens clothes and underwear, he’s gay or bi and in the closet. Now is it POSSIBLE that he’s just eccentric and likes doing weird ****? Sure. But the likelihood is, he’s gay or bisexual.

 

They so were and they would "Go Gurrl!" each other constantly.

 

Okay, thank you...but was the hell does intimate partner violence have anything to do with this shooter in Texas?

 

The same thing I said to the other chic… which you responded to.

If you present an FBI profiler with the information that his suspect is depressed, psychotic, has broken from reality, wears make up to school, was bullied because of his clothes and makeup and was engaging in cutting himself…

At or near the very top of his list would be a transgender or a crossdresser. So I don’t believe it’s COMPLETELY outside of reason to conclude it’s probable Salvador was a trans in the closet.

 

That's a far leap in logic. No sale. Your biases are what's motivating you to claim such bs. IPV actually weakens your argument, not support it.

 

Oh, I promise you I have more ethics than any transgender or any cisgender that want men in a woman’s bathroom. Or allow men in women's locker rooms in swimming pools while little girls are getting ready to swim in the same environment. Support for transgenders is not ethical at all.

that’s not saying I believe this particular claim…. Yet….

 

Your assumptions about me, my life, my husband, trans people and calling our founding fathers mentally disturbed is truly off base.

Perhaps you aren’t familiar with my posting style, but I don’t really take interrogation from fellow forum posters, well. I don’t take quizzes. Your dirty mind can just keep fantasizing about what other men you don’t know, wear.

 

Okay

 

Then all the people have is the free and fair vote (which is being eroded as we speak).

 

Can you explain what banned means? If you are banned, how are you able to post? Sort of diminishes the word.

 

I don't know. Let the fascists decide, I guess.

 

Oh .. you mean like the ever increasing mountain of evidence that 81 million voters did not vote for the dementia patient keep in the basement over the man that filled up stadiums every week and how he brought a prosperity the DC elite had not allowed since the end of WWII?

 

The ever growing mountain of evidence only exists in the minds of the wishful thinkers.

 

2000 mules.. I don't doubt your ability to ignore reality tho'

 

Trust me, I get how badly you wanted Trump to win. He filed dozens of lawsuits that failed in epic fashion. His fellow Republicans told him he was bonkers.

I'm not sure why you didn't send your evidence to Giuliani. He sure could have used your insight and hard evidence.