Just so I know, Election fraud claims are acceptable if they come from the left?

.

 

Nope, sorry.

 

Can you explain how ALL fraud evidence was dismissed by so many courts? If that isn't a coordinated effort, I don't know what is. If that isn't DISMISSING something then I guess i will have to google what the word means

 

Because all of that evidence was not credible, the problem is that YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT FACT.

 

Just so you know, even in ruby red states, Republicans are the ones that overwhelmingly got convicted of 2020 election fraud...

 

ALL of it just happened to magically be NOT CREDIBLE? Who cares if I refuse to accept it? I also refuse to go protest and riot so the most danger here is a man and his keyboard.
Sorry, but after Hillary got a full pass and seeing our 2 tier system in action, i will probably never accept it. Maybe the left should air some kind of special that shows EVERY piece of evidence submitted and HOW it was not "credible". I really wouldn't mind being proven wrong on this. It would actually help me sleep better at night to know our election wasn't cheated.

 

An Ambien and a whiskey shot will help just as much.

 

If you do this with voter ballots, cheating will happen!

 

And REPUBLICANS are the ones getting busted. Either Democrats are inherently that much smarter, or your OP is

 

Yes, there were some Democrats who made those claims, but most Democrats ignored the those accusations. It was not like the Democrats stormed the capital, called for Obama and VP Biden's head, or any other member of congress, destroyed public property in Washington DC for election protests, etc.

You are trying to compare apples to a duran when cutting open the fruit. BTW, the GOP is the Duran in this anology.

 

Thats how a 2-tier justice system works
For the citizens AND politicians of a certain party

Thanks for proving that for me!

 

You are trying to shove "Election fraud for me but not for thee" down my throat and I don't appreciate it. Just stop! go on believing in your double standard but stop trying to shove it down my throat

 

'Idiot' and 'stupid' is fine. That's just free speech. The problem is when its labeled 'domestic extremism' by the authorities and treated like a crime, or when folks start calling for 'election deniers' to be investigated by law enforcement, 'cancelled' and/or barred from holding public office.

Should Jean-Pierre be treated the same as the 'Stop The Steal' activists (NOT the ones who engaged in violence- violence is actually a crime), or is what she said not a 'threat to democracy'?

 

Where in the article do they show exactly what she tweeted about Trump or provide a link to it? If it is there I missed it.

After the Purge
How a massive voter purge in Georgia affected the 2018 election
https://www.apmreports.org/story/2019/10/29/georgia-voting-registration-records-removed

 

I'm done with your games! if you want to pretend it never happened, that is your right.

 

Thanks for pointing out the false equivalence.

 

I didn't say she didn't write a tweet. But the language she used matters. The article you linked to says she said Trump "stole" the election. The least they could do is post the tweet in which she made the accusation.

Accept her explanation or don't. I really don't care.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-Biden-press-secretary-peter-doocy-trump.html

I will say these attempts at gotcha moments I'm sure play well on Faux. But nobody else gives a damn.

 

Here you go, check out this list of people who would never claim an election was stolen. It’s a big list.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...sults-its-never-been-done-before-ever.603732/

 

Have you seen this thread?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...sults-its-never-been-done-before-ever.603732/

 

Here's the Trump one
https://twitter.com/K_JeanPierre/status/810294911815847936
(I had to use duckduckgo to find it as its almost impossible to find on left wing owned google)
still need to find the Georgia one. i did not know the twitter links in the original article were dead, sorry about that. I saw these tweets weeks ago when the reporter called her out. I'm sure I could find it though

 

As I said, it is not the claims of election fraud, it is the storming of the capital that separates the sheep from the goats.

 

So we can level set….who specifically, of the ‘stop the steal’ activists, are you comparing Jean-Pierre to? Want to make sure we’re comparing apples to apples.

 

The answer, of course, is that the law, or any standards democrats choose, don't apply to them, don't you know... LOL..

Democrats rely on their pet media to make sure folks never remember their own BS...

 

So she shouldn’t have her position in the White House right? I mean you wouldn’t want a terrorist like her who claims the election was stolen in the White House. Right?

 

so you agree Trump was wrong to falsely claim the election was stolen and not concede?