Elon Musk reveals what led to Twitter suppressing Hunter Biden story in 2020

Apparently,. the failed reelection campaign of Trump wholly relied upon penis pictures of Hunter Biden being on Twitter, and without those pictures, this was obviously an attempt to sway the reelection of Trump by censoring the Hunter Biden story!

Here is an alternative perspective.

If the Turmp reelection campaign hinged solely upon a private citizens genitals being on Twitter, maybe they should have worked on their platform and messaging a bit harder.

 

Only person who has mentioned hunter biden's penis is you, multiple times. Very odd.

Seems like the actual concern was related to his funding by the chinese and ukraine, and his crack cocaine use and hooker use. Can you support your claim of anyone here caring about his penis besides you?

 

Ah thanks for that, not too surprising. Didnt realize it was a shared talking point tactic.

 

The fact that pictures of under age girls were found on the laptop should have been a red flag, in addition to the drugs and the lies that Joe Biden had no idea of the "business dealings", when in fact, he was a part of them:

The laptop – while allegedly containing inappropriate photographs of underage girls – revealed that President Biden lied when he said that he had no knowledge of Hunter’s business dealings – and was in fact involved with them.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

More links to follow the stories and the lies told by Joe Biden and The FBI as well as the media running cover for them:

https://wearechange.org/10-for-the-...hunter-bidens-china-ukraine-emails-are-legit/

 

Joe Biden, part of Hunter's business dealings.

Because.....we want that as our reality.

 

Because it as much you as you wish it wasn't.

As former US Attorney Andrew McCarthy cuts to the chase

"...To summarize, three months before the Post reported on the laptop, there was already not only a Hunter Biden criminal investigation but a Senate Republican investigation of the scandal the media-Democrat complex continues to bury: the cashing in on Joe Biden’s political influence by his family members, with his knowing and willful involvement, to the tune of millions of dollars that poured into Biden family coffers from agents of corrupt and authoritarian regimes, including some, such as China and Russia, that are hostile to the United States."

[noting the FBI role in promoting the Russia collusion hoax McCarthy goes on]

..When FBI agents met weekly with Twitter and Facebook in the run-up to the 2020 election, they weren’t doing it for their health. They were doing it to convey to both companies that, just as Russia had interfered in the 2016 election, it was undoubtedly trying to do so again in 2020. (In fact, the Post reports that the briefings were led by one of the FBI’s top cybersecurity agents, Elvis Chan, for whom Russia’s 2016 machinations have become the source of a postgraduate thesis and semi-celebrity.) The very unsubtle message, since it was coming from the government’s top law-enforcement agency, was that the companies should carefully police their platforms, lest they be accused of disseminating foreign disinformation and undermining election integrity. In fact, agent Laura Dehmlow, who runs the bureau’s “Foreign Influence Task Force,” reportedly hectored Twitter in March 2020 over the imperative that media platforms be “held accountable” for allowing “disinformation” to be spread. The FBI was not in a position to order the companies to suppress information. It was, however, well-positioned to make them fear that the failure to suppress information it might perceive as dodgy could result in serious legal consequences."
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022...ough Friday 2022-12-06&utm_term=NRDaily-Smart

The federal government took part in censoring a story about a Presidential candidate for that candidates advantage and to unseat a President.

 

"Orders" no. FBI told Twitter just before the NY Post story that they were expecting a repeat of 2016 where Russia hacked DNC emails and released them and that they were expecting another hack and release regarding Hunter with the expectation that Twitter would suppress the news.

 

No, because we have the emails where Hunter negotiated a deal with Burisma with

"the ultimate purpose to close down for any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine."

Nikolay, the founder of Burisma under investigation for corruption.
And ONE month later, Joe Biden is in Ukraine threatening to withhold aid unless they fired the prosecutor in charge of "cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine.". He was fired. New prosecutor closed the case against Nikolay.



Re Revised Burisma Proposal, Contract and Invoice PDF | PDF | Government | Business (scribd.com)

 

We have court testimony from the FBI who held weekly meetings, face to face between Twitter execs and 7 FBI officials and testimony from Twitter that the FBI told them to look out for hacked material regarding Hunter, soon to be released. Alleging a repeat of 2016 where Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails.
FBI would be certain not to evidence their own guilt in emails. Thus the face to face in California with Twiter

 

Newly liberated Twitter blows lid off Democrat tainting of 2020 election.

'To recap, in 2016 the DNC and Hillary Clinton concocted a fake scandal about Donald Trump and then peddled it to Democrats in the media, who hysterically promoted it for years knowing that it was 100 percent false.'

'In 2020, after the discovery of Hunter Biden’s X-rated laptop, the Democrats, knowing that everything on it was 100 percent true, peddled the fantastic tale that it was Russian disinformation.'

'And the same corrupt Democrats in the media, who four years earlier had promoted a bogus scandal about Republicans, now refused to cover a real, far worse scandal about Democrats.]

To summarized: “They stole the election. And they tried to make you think you were crazy for knowing they stole the election.”

'Elon Musk did not commit suicide.'

And, we all knew this.

 

1) "we"? Who is "we"?
2) "all knew"? What did "all know"?
3) "this" What "this" is being referred to?
Clearly, Everybody (who actually deals in Reality) Knows that the Following Statement is Complete Tinfoil Hat BS:
“They stole the election. And they tried to make you think you were crazy for knowing they stole the election.”
So? What are the answers to questions 1), 2), and 3)?

 

It depends on what the meaning of "is" is.