Tucker Carlson starts to divulge the Capitol video tapes

OMG! He lies more often than Trump and I did not think that was possible!

 

How many Republicans tried to stop the Jan 6 committee

 

OMG! They didn't show videos of people not committing crimes! How absurd! They didn't show video of the little girl.helping her little brother play hide and seek under the Confederate flag! Oh the humanity!!!!

 

The lies of Fox - this is relevant here because it underscores that Tucker is not a reliable source

 

Funny, the only ones that I've heard, saying that rioters "killed him," outside the Capitol, are the Rs, here. He was assaulted, but with chemical spray (not beaten). It was possibly bear spray, as it is known that one of the men did buy a can of that and brought it to the Capitol, in the other's backpack.The two perpetrators were sentenced to 6 years imprisonment. There are videos, but it was a very quick attack. 3 Capitol Police were targeted.

What is your source, for the info that Sicknick showed up at work, on the 7th? All the reports I've seen, including on the 2nd video, above, say Sicknick checked into the hospital on the 6th, and died on the 7th. It seems implied that he was never discharged from the hospital.

 

some Republicans think finding a calm in the storm proves there was no storm?

 

Did you watch Tucker’s show which proved democrats lied? Next: you surely must believe CNN and MSNBC are the epitomes of truth and reliability.

The media and democrats repeatedly said five people were murdered on 1/6, Fox didn’t. Now I’m asking you, from up here to all the way down there, how many people were you told died on 1/6 and who got you to believe it? Was it Biden, Harris, democrats in general, or the left wing media you trust with your soul?

 

if Jan 6th never happened, would he of died..... you can get hit today and die tomorrow from something like a blood clot

 

Joy Reid’s rebuttal

 

Tucker could not lie straight in bed and the video proved how he and his boss Rupert Murdoch deliberately and consciously lied to the American public

BTW please never offer to send Rupie baby back we do not want him!

 

Total avoidance of what I asked. Total. You’re just obediently obeying what you’ve been told to think on a subject, Carlson’s show, which you never saw. You won’t even form your own opinion, you’re 100% willing to have your opinion programmed into you. It’s no wonder you guys believe all the insane things you do, all it takes is your handlers telling you to obey and without question you do.

 

I'll take your silence on the matter, to indicate your quailing at the idea of backing up your claim about editing, through the test, I'd proposed.


I am not sure what lies, you think are proven, by Tucker's clips: that there was not a massive attack on the Capitol, by Trump supporters? How does officer Sicknick walking around, inside the Capitol, presumably after being sprayed with a chemical agent, for instance, change the day's overall narrative?

 

LOL. The lesson that you took from that incident is that, no matter how much proof you see, no one, is ever guilty-- except Black Lives Matter, of course?

Rittenhouse has absolutely nothing to do with this-- FYI.

 

Thanks for getting that segment for me, but it did not prove anything about Epps; in fact it did not even show Epps, on video, much less, on audio. All it was, as I'd assumed & earlier postulated, was a bunch of unsupported talking points, between Tucker & a Kentucky Congressman. And even they made no specific allegations about Epps. The whole segment could be summed up, on that topic, as the behavior of federal agents, came across to those two, as strange. You consider that, a smoking gun?

 

I have no idea of what I am looking at, or why you want to show it to me, what you think it proves.

But I don't want you to get hung up on those questions because, as far as the assault on the Capitol, Rep. Hawley's running clip, never meant squat, to begin with. It had been meant to show his hypocrisy, and to embarrass him, IMO. The existence of that clip is of no real importance. So how is whatever you are trying to show me, about that unimportant clip, significant?

 

Again, you go back to talking about BLM.

Wrong thread.

 

Which is actually why the Speaker gave them to Tucker. Most of us would not consider the possibility of watching his show and he's now free to make whatever narrative he wishes. I pity the souls that have to watch him to fact check but they at least are getting paid.

 

Nobody ever said "five people were murdered on 1/6"...
So? Why post such egregiously misguided Bulllshit?
They may have reported that "5 People DIED"...
But NOT five people were murdered on 1/6...
Give me a Freaking break!:smdh:
Capitol attack: the five people who died
Officer Brian Sicknick, 42, was reportedly struck in head during Wednesday’s riot, while four Trump supporters also died.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/08/capitol-attack-police-officer-five-deaths

 

You are correct

He did collapse after the riot at 10pm that night, but this was after he had returned to his division office. He died on the 7th

 

What I found disturbing about the clip, the congressman repeatedly lauding the exposure by Tucker while Tucker sits there and nods at the demand that the tapes be released to everyone. Did the congressman forget that Tucker has all the tapes and is keeping them for his own use? Did Tucker forget that he has all the tapes? Is there some restraint that says Tucker can use them as he sees fit, but not allowed to share all the tapes with everybody? Did the House speaker and pals get a piece of the action?

 

They hid the videos and prevented them from being seen and then lied about what happened.

 

It's the narrative. All riots are bad. Seems to have been a problem for progressives to come to terms with. As you exasperated Jan 6 while ignoring the violence caused by BLM riots.

 

"They"? Do you mean those damn republican members of congress were keeping them secret? At any time, any member of congress, could request to see the videos and make public commentary.

 

Not that I owe you any type of explanation….I posted the pics because someone tried to spin it by saying…”but if their behavior was less disruptive than that portrayed by the committee, we deserve to know”. So I posted the pics to show proof that we already know it was quite disruptive. That no spin can claim it was less disruptive. In others keeping him honest.

 

Have you ever wondered why QShaman (buffalo guy) received such attention from so many capitol police officers? If I were QShaman, I'd have been very leery of so many different capitol police officers being cordial by opening doors and escorting QShaman throughout the capitol, for examples...If I were QShaman, I'd have been shouting fed, fed, fed instead of being led by the cordial capitol police. A setup, do ya suppose, by the capitol police, at least?