Tucker Carlson starts to divulge the Capitol video tapes

1. So, everyone and I mean everyone who entered the capital building was just as violent and disruptive as those pictures showed and there was no one who simply walked in the doors or pushed in by the crowd. Claiming so is a bold-faced lie.

2. Or, unlike what was portrayed by the committee, although some may have made poor judgement in getting near the capital building that day, a large number of the thousand or so people who entered that Capital were not destructive and did not assault police officers. They were "less disruptive than portrayed by the committee."

So, #1 is the claim of leftists which you seem to side with. No?

 

By far most convictions have ended with less than 2 months of jail time, home detention or probation. Not exactly throwing the book at them. The yahoos that stole or destroyed property are the few getting over two years Breaking and entry getting 2 years or less? Pretty soft if you ask me.

 

No…which is why I haven’t said such.

The claim being made by the poster was not about certain individuals being less disruptive. But what does it matter that some were less disruptive? That doesn’t change the fact that in the entirety it was very disruptive with all the destruction that took place. I’m curious, are you just as concerned with those who were “less disruptive” during the BLM riots? Because I’m not.

 

Actually Joe did say it when he was suggesting the Capitol riot inspired Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine

“Look, how would you feel if you saw crowds storm and break down the doors of the British Parliament and kill five cops, injure 145? Or the German Bundestag or the Italian Parliament?”

video here
https://nypost.com/2022/03/02/biden...apitol-riot-as-gop-cites-afghanistan-cut-run/

 

Colour you in denial of facts....

 

Obviously you've not watched the videos that were kept secret for 2 years.

Once again you show how wrong one can be in judging a book by its cover, by believing the statements of known liars in government.

 

Remember when government was found manipulating data and bias with Twitter?

People are controlling the narrative and some people are buying right into it every single time.

 

If the claim is being made that this was a violent murderous seditious action, I would think showing the non-violent protest with the claimed murdered Capitol cop walking around calmly is pretty important if the truth and honesty is what is desired.

 

Attack?

When doors are opened and a tour conducted by the security team for the facility, does it make sense to use the word "attack"?

The left wing NEEDS this event in the narrative they painted for partisan needs. It's all too clear now, and the continued defense of the narrative proves what the goal is.

What happened to the "it was mostly peaceful protests" platitudes during BLM? Why now is the need to surpress the truth that largely shows the same thing?

 

The lies of the left wing media, and then having to eat Crow when the actual truth came out is exactly the same as this.

Its almost like the left endorses information manipulation as a means to their political ends, and then doesn't want to talk about the truth.

They got 26 months of "Republicans are white nationalist terrorists!" bs even repeated by the president all for partisan fodder, based on highly manipulated information... instance after instance proves truth is not the priority of our truly radicalized left.

 

Was this part of the tour?


Here's the security team opening the doors for the tour. Look at how anxious everyone is to get in.



Wait...don't they know the doors were opened for the tour?

 

I've seen pictures of little girls with dolls in Kosovo, doesn't make me forget the drones.

Remember what she said at his sentencing, I sure hope that he does.

 

My little brain has a hard time figuring out the difference in the crowds... I really don't know anyone in my little bubble who would just start beating windows in at the Capitol building and openly fighting with the police.... is there a reason this crowd turned violent?

Be truthful with yourself.... do you know anybody in your life who would stand at the entrance to a federal building with a ball bat and beat a window in?...

this crowd
https://tinyurl.com/2euxxmf3


and this crowd
https://rumble.com/v2c2tua-tucker-carlson-tonight-full-episode-monday-march-6.html

 

I don't understand what this means.

On what grounds are you suggesting a lawsuit?

 

The spin by the Jan.6 committee, et al about QAnon Shaman is pure misinformation.

 

SIAP. Look, I already realize you're not American and probably not up to speed on this but the dems in the House of Representatives stopped house members of the GOP from participating in the 01/06 committee sham.
Who the dems in the house allowed on the GOP side were known Trump hating morons, Liz Cheney and the guy from Illinois. BTW, both are out of the House of Representatives as we speak.

 

So why didn't Republicans present members that weren't likely to be subjects of the investigation? Go back and look up who they wanted on the committee. Then compare who was turned down with the witness list. How awkward to have to step down from the committee and then testify.

 

You just support the people that support them.

 

Yes. The GOP wanted GOP people on the committee who probably shunned (for a lack of a better word) the decided narrative of the 01/06 committee sham investigation.

 

That's easy.

There were no actual Republicans on the committee.

 

Seats were offered but Republicans turned them down because one member was refused as a likely subject of the investigation.

 

LoL sure.

 

Most of the clips shown by Carlson were new.
He did start the show with several clips of violent confrontations with police that have been aired repeatedly.

 

Sicknick died of natural causes. Not from anything that happened during the demonstrations or the riot.
The Medical Examiners report is corroborated by the clip aired by Carlson.
All of the statements by politicians and journalists to the contrary were not true.

 

Carlson is an exceptionally biases source, like the J6 Committee, and like the J6 Committee and the MSM he is very selective in his reporting.