Donald Trump Will Hold Campaign Rally in Waco During 30th Anniversary of Branch Davidian Standoff

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Think for myself, Mar 24, 2023.

  1. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    9,469
    Likes Received:
    5,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That should be his next weeks grift.
    Selling raffle tickets in case he has to hole up in Mar a Lago.
    The tickets will say "STAND BACK & STAND BY"
    Prices range from 10,000 to 25,000 a ticket.
    Accommodations to be announced.
    1,000 tickets will be drawn.
     
  2. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Explaining to you, what constitutes a "conspiracy theory," has got to be one of the more ironic things I've ever done. The derogatory implication of "Conspiracy theory" is that it it is a narrative that seems ridiculous on its face. Therefore, that the sky appears blue, could not, as it is, qualify as a conspiracy theory. To make it a conspiracy theory, you would need add more to it. For example: the sky is blue, because extra terrestrials filter much of the other light wavelengths, out of our atmosphere, would come across as a conspiracy theory.

    With your now finally understanding this term-- that Trump's rally would be coinciding with the 30th anniversary of Waco, completely by accident, is the thing that would seem hard to believe. If Family Feud asked 100 people, "name something you associate with Waco, Texas," there would likely be only 3 replies:

    #1 Answer: David Koresh
    #2 Answer: ATF siege
    #3 Answer: Branch Davidian compound inferno.

    So, though Trump is not very knowledgeable about our country's history-- I'll give you that-- the by far greater likelihood, is still that he is aware of the timing; particularly the way the anti-government theme of his campaign so suitably fits that historical encounter. The fact that he is denying the connection, can be written off to the fact that Trump is an inveterate liar; in just his four years as President, literally thousands of his lies were identified, by the press. I suspect that you will say that these lies-- which it would be an easy thing for you to research, should you care to check-- were not lies at all, but that this is all just a false narrative, cooked up by the MSM, perhaps in cooperation with the DNC, and sold to the better part of the American public. That take on things, btw, would be a perfect example of a Conspiracy theory.
     
    nopartisanbull and Quantum Nerd like this.
  3. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,001
    Likes Received:
    90,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Remember when Trump was going to do something on August 8th, or 88 which means HH which means heil Hitler? That's how crazy they are.
     
    CharisRose and Trixare4kids like this.
  4. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,556
    Likes Received:
    11,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol, I remember!
    I think they do this when they are fearful. They cringe when they see Biden's poll numbers tank to record lows, and with Trump's numbers now surpassing DeSantis's, their crazy gets even crazier. :p
     
    CharisRose and Steve N like this.
  5. Noone

    Noone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2021
    Messages:
    14,018
    Likes Received:
    8,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Donald Judas tRump is a dangerous Adderall addled narcissistic psychopath.
     
    Izzy likes this.
  6. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Remember when Trump supporters were capable of criticizing Trump when he did something stupid or lied?

    You know, that thing that never was?
     
    Grey Matter, Izzy and Quantum Nerd like this.
  7. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Projection at its finest.
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  8. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not to celebrate but hey, you gotta misrepresent it to the best of your abilities lol
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  9. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The thing that never was, that’s Dems being honest about Trump lol. Not a single time has a democrat ever been reasonably critical of Trump. Y’all take what he says or does and crank the hyperbole to 100 lol, to the point is simply lies.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023
    CharisRose and Steve N like this.
  10. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And this is the failure of MAGA, the blanket exoneration of Trump
     
  11. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Incorrect, as it’s not happening. However the failure of Dems is the blanket condemnation of Trump. Regardless of what he does or says, the left simply lies about it.
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  12. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Boom, my theory becomes reality
     
    Izzy likes this.
  13. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Only in your mind.
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  14. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,298
    Likes Received:
    31,349
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What white Christian children are being bombed by our government? I can only find one instance of the government bombing civilians and that was a black apartment building.
     
  15. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    9,469
    Likes Received:
    5,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    When Trump arrived in 2015-16 his supporters said what they really like about Trump is that he "tells it like it is".
    And 8 years later they're still telling us what he really meant.

    :roflol:
     
    bx4, omni, DEFinning and 1 other person like this.
  16. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That’s not true at all. We are simply telling you what he actually said, and not just going along with your misinterpretation of his words.

    “Good people on both sides” is a good example lol. Yet the left ran with a very different account of what he “actually” said.
     
    CharisRose and Steve N like this.
  17. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So he did not call white supremacists good people? Because he did.
     
    DEFinning likes this.
  18. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He objectively did not. But thank you for being the example I needed lol.
     
    CharisRose likes this.
  19. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's noteworthy, how you can laugh about your inability to present an argument-- have your failures always amused you, so?


    Tell us, next, how Trump did not call the Press, the Enemy of the People.

    Or how he did not call Sect'y of State Raffensperger, saying he just needs x-nunber of votes, that he's sure Brad must be able to find, and that it might land him in legal trouble, if he can't!


     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023
  20. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I specifically created an argument that is objectively correct, and directly refuted his claim. Trump never said what he claimed, in fact I already said above a couple posts what he actually said.

    The perception of my failure is just projection. As you could never even begin to argue that Trump objectively said what he who claims to think for himself claimed Trump said.

    So as I said in the beginning. It’s not Trump
    Supporters telling you what Trump “actually” said, it is simply pointing out his literal words despite the left actually trying to misinterpret them.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023
    CharisRose and ButterBalls like this.
  21. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is all about the SYMBOLISM. Trump's candidacy is about standing up against the government, to fight the Deep State.
     
  22. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It’s about standing up to leftist corruption, that has plagued our government for so long, and crippled it. And the left is reacting as if he is doing exactly that lol.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023
    CharisRose and ButterBalls like this.
  23. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    9,469
    Likes Received:
    5,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Last night on Newsmax Trump claims he's had 100,000 people at one of his rallies.
    Which one he forgot to say.
    Anyone?

    "confronts" ? lol

    Trumps asked about criticism that he's "stoking the fires" with Waco Rally and IGNORES the question and of course the Anchor gives him a pass.


    WATCH: Newsmax Anchor Confronts Trump On Criticism He’s ‘Stoking The Fires’ With Rally In Waco

    video
    https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch...ism-hes-stoking-the-fires-with-rally-in-waco/

    Aaron Rupar
    @atrupar



    Trump completely ignores a question by Newsmax's Rob Schmitt asking him to respond to criticism of him holding a rally in Waco on 30th anniversary of Branch Davidian Standoff and just rants about his crowd sizes

    26.7K views
    0:00 / 2:19

    9:28 PM · Mar 24, 2023
    ·




     
  24. Quantum Nerd

    Quantum Nerd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    18,101
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Absolutely. Anyone who thinks that Trump chose the location and the date of the rally by accident should have their head examined. It's all a dog whistle to the government haters, who sympathize with the Branch Davidian cult, who they think stood up to big bad government using their 2nd amendment right.

    While this stunt may gain Trump some more undying love from the whacko RW extremists, it is sure to turn off the moderates. While it might help him to win the primary (unless DeSanctimounious comes up with some more stunts by himself, to up the ante), it will be an anchor around his neck in the general.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023
  25. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL-- that's funny, because Think for Yourself brought this up, in post #43, and your post I'd quoted, only saying that Trump "objectively did not (sic)" say this, according to just you, and no other "objective" source, had been post #44. My post, replying to your post, had been post #45. Your reply to me, which I quote at top, here, is #46.

    So that means your couple of posts, in which you tell us what Trump had "actually said," had been #44 & 1/3rd, and 44 & 2/3rds?
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2023

Share This Page