Durham bombshell: Prosecutor unveils smoking gun FBI text message, 'joint venture' to smear Trump

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, Mar 28, 2023.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,744
    Likes Received:
    11,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yea.... you did not do your homework, sport..... now as Paul Harvey used to say... "the rest of the story"

    Wow... "accuses ANYONE of not doing their homework??" This was 5 years ago

    And where are the convictions? This is accusations, not proof... this indictment just states wild accusations never brought to court and cross examination. what court were they tried in?

    BUTTTTTTT........ oh wait.... here is "the rest of the story"
    there was two companies indicted (along with the original 13) that, OMG, actually had legal representation show up (The companies, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering) ...something Mueller never dreamed would happen.... but there is this sticky little thing in a trial where during "discovery" which means the prosecutors had to release all the "gotcha" stuff to the defendant.... oooopsy.... Mueller's team dropped the case... ""Citing "a risk of exposure of law enforcement's tools and techniques," the Justice Department on Monday moved to dismiss the prosecution"".. ""“change in the balance of the government’s proof due to a classification determination,”" .... now there boys and girls is some real foot in mouth .... but if you had done your homework.... you would have known that...

    Just another show of what a joke our own DOJ is...

    https://www.npr.org/2020/03/17/8172...inst-russians-linked-to-election-interference
    https://archive.is/ShKSX#selection-505.144-505.232
    https://archive.is/m5hfG
    https://www.businessinsider.com/doj-moves-to-drop-charges-ira-russians-indicted-mueller-2020-3?op=1
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-drop-its-prosecution-2-firms-linked-n1161886
     
  2. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,744
    Likes Received:
    11,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show us.... "Intel agencies were clearly spying on the hackers already" .oh please oh please... tell us how Intel agencies were clearly spying on the hackers... It seems there were 17 intel agencies working on it, right?...
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2023
  3. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,653
    Likes Received:
    37,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those other indictments had nothing to do with the hack. Try to focus here. Did you read the indictment? See all the evidence they have of who did it?
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,653
    Likes Received:
    37,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read the indictment and it’s clear
     
  5. wist43

    wist43 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,285
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's called "jury nullification"... it's Washington D.C. - laws do not apply to Democrats.

    Durham could show video footage of any Democrat committing every crime known to man and they would never be convicted in Washington D.C.

    No such thing as an honest Democrat. It is what it is.
     
  6. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,744
    Likes Received:
    11,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no proof in the indictment... just unfounded unverified claims.. but you are missing the point... there is no court and there is/isn't convictions after the "unfounded unverified claims" are proven or unproven.. In my country, America, people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of your peers (or judge) ... it may not be that way in your country.. That is the part in your story that you are leaving out..

    Prove to us these unfounded unverified claims in the indictment are true or not. Show us the jury verdict from the court proceedings..
    ""From at least in or around March 2016 through November 2016, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, Defendants NETYKSHO, ANTONOV, BADIN, YERMAKOV, LUKASHEV, MORGACHEV, KOZACHEK, YERSHOV, MALYSHEV, OSADCHUK, and POTEMKIN, together with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally conspired to commit offenses against the United States""
    https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

    here is "the rest of the story"
    there was two companies indicted (along with the original 13) that, OMG, actually had legal representation show up (The companies, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering) ...something Mueller never dreamed would happen.... but there is this sticky little thing in a trial where during "discovery" which means the prosecutors had to release all the "gotcha" stuff to the defendant.... oooopsy.... Mueller's team dropped the case... ""Citing "a risk of exposure of law enforcement's tools and techniques," the Justice Department on Monday moved to dismiss the prosecution"".. ""“change in the balance of the government’s proof due to a classification determination,”" .... now there boys and girls is some real foot in mouth .... but if you had done your homework.... you would have known that...

    Just another show of what a joke our own DOJ is...

    https://www.npr.org/2020/03/17/8172...inst-russians-linked-to-election-interference
    https://archive.is/ShKSX#selection-505.144-505.232
    https://archive.is/m5hfG
    https://www.businessinsider.com/doj-moves-to-drop-charges-ira-russians-indicted-mueller-2020-3?op=1
    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-drop-its-prosecution-2-firms-linked-n1161886
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2023
  7. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,653
    Likes Received:
    37,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You keep focusing on a case that wasn’t about the hacking. None of the info given in the indictment could have come from crowdstrike. Do you think it was all just fabricated?? Is that how far down the rabbit hole were gonna go??
     
  8. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,744
    Likes Received:
    11,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Short and sweet... there are only unfounded unverified claims in the indictment... Show us any one in the indictment was convicted... 5 years later...
     
  9. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,653
    Likes Received:
    37,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you accusing the trump DOJ of exactly?
     
  10. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,744
    Likes Received:
    11,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The DOJ that was directly involved in a failed coup attempt to overthrow the Trump presidency in an attempted insurrection... Not hardly "Trump's DOJ" by any definition.. and not America's DOJ either...

    An indictment does not mean that a person has been found guilty of a crime. As you you were proven wrong about the Russians above , you immediately deflect back to Trump... Just typical liberal tactic away from the obvious.
     
  11. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,653
    Likes Received:
    37,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What was I proven wrong about? If you think this indictment was just mueller making up stuff, why was it allowed to stand once he left? Barr had no problem stepping in for Flynn and Stone, but he let an indictment with made up evidence stand??
     
    Hey Now likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page