[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z9fjxjbuLA"]Straight Down Demolition Gone Bad[/ame] wow completely defies the laws of physics it should have fell straight down! oh wait that was in Turkey and they have different laws than the united states, I forgot They should have use planes ya think?
You're saying the buildings that collapsed on 9/11 are completely different than a controlled demolition? I agree. No CD on 9/11.
The Twin Towers didn't fall straight down. They hit other buildings on the way down. Why do conspiracy theorists always ignore reality?
wtc didnt roll over now did it! propagandists never change do they! laws of physics as determined on 9 11 states building go straight down and do not tip over when they collapse! Maybe you are simply saying that demolitions tip em over huh?
Do you take pride in being wrong in every post you post? No laws of physics were determined on 9/11. No laws of physics were broken on 9/11. No one of significance has ever claimed that "building go straight down and do not tip over when they collapse." The performance of the structure of the WTC was studied by professionals across many disciplines. Not one of them thinks that a new law of physics was discovered, or that a law of physics was broken by the collapse. The building collapsed the way it did as a result of flaws in the building's design. The discovery of these flaws prompted new building codes to correct the problems in the future. Different structural systems transfer load differently. Does this really need to be stated? Of course different buildings collapsed differently. They have different designs. They have different masses. They have different centers of gravity. They are made from different materials. They have different slenderness ratios. Why would anyone with any sense make a claim that all buildings should behave the same?
Funny, I've watched vids of the WTC collapses and they don't fall straight down. I much be watching the non edited, non bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy versions.
Yes really. And there are no flaws in my mind. http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-forensic-investigation-revise-building-codes http://www.buildings.com/ArticleDetails/tabid/3334/Default.aspx?ArticleID=6719#top
It turns out that even a combination of high-speed collisions by two airliners and fires across multiple floors would not have destroyed the Twin Towers, according to NIST's final 2005 report on their collapse. mostly lies but at least they got that much right. so whats your point
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lLaAD6OZOk"]Korn - Liar - YouTube[/ame] (*)(*)(*)(*) that megadeath one is perfect but would get me banned LOL water pouring down the stairs
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lLaAD6OZOk"]Korn - Liar - YouTube[/ame] well lets see all 4 sides of wtc 2 moments before they shot it. (oh thats demolition talk like pull it) LOLOLOL WOW LOOK AT THAT RAGING INFERNO!!!!! nope no fire over here! WOW LOOK AT THAT RAGING INFERNO!!!!!! nope no fire over here! With that much fire and heat I am surprized the whole city of new york didnt simply evaporate and turn to dust! LOLOLOL oh wait they were talking about this 911!!! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7OyNBvnm2w"]Multiple families homeless after raging fire[/ame] but that is not REALLY a fire if you want to see a REAL fire you have to look at the wtc 2! BBWWHAHAHAHAHA [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7OyNBvnm2w"][/ame]
now what was I supposed to oh all theose new regulations and codes n stuff investigators issued 31 recommendations yeh ok
No idea where all the meaningless tangent are going, but to address the OP: No laws of physics, engineering or chemistry were set or broken on 9/11/01.
Something other than planes helped those towers fall. After ten years, no one will ever change my mind on that.