UA 175: Who created this fake footage from this rare south view?

Discussion in '9/11' started by 7forever, Dec 1, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

?

Who altered this footage?

  1. Manos Megagiannis

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  2. A TV network like CNN

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. A law enforcement agency

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I gave proof and eyewitness accounts of a blob moving toward the towers from the west who saw it live on tv. Guess what, it wasn't a plane because a plane cannot circle a building.:bored:
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    okay,I'll bite...why can't a plane circle a building?
     
  3. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Four flying bombs were captured on film and survived without alteration. The only inconsistency is chopper 4 disappears behind the top of tower 1, while the other three are lower but at the same level. Here they are in this order; NY1, WB11, CBS, and Chopper 4, aka NBC. Only the CBS orb did not air live. The Today Show aired the orb but changed camera angles before it could complete its path to explosion.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still waiting...Why can't a plane circle a building?
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Answer your own question. How can a plane traveling 500 mph that's headed straight for the west of side of T2 crash into the southeast corner of that same Tower?

    [​IMG]
     
  6. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html
    The orb never turned north which means only two things could have happened.

    It either crashed into the west side of T2 or it circled the building like the witnesses reported, including Matt Lauer. The orb did exactly what Manos' footage shows with his faked footage that exactly mirrored what the orb did behind and between the rear of the towers. You can see it cast its own shadow between the towers.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    41. Here is the story behind my videos: The distance is about 6 miles, (according to Google Earth), recorded using a Sony PC1. After I got a call from a friend of mine about the first plane, I started filming from inside my apartment. To get a bit better view I went to the roof of the building, and the moment I pointed the camera to the WTC and started recording, without even realizing it I captured the second plane hitting the tower. Actually if you see the original tape you will notice that I move the camera so I can confirm with my own eyes the explosion that I saw through the viewfinder. The rest is just very basic digital zoom (very amateurish I admit). The woman's voice, was some tenant in the same building.

    The videos have NOT being edited to make the plane disappear or anything like that (as some claim). One of these days, if I find some free time I may go back to the master and re-master the video.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why does the building in all those spammed gifs have no windows?

    That can't be the WTC.
     
  8. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's the rear of the towers. Manos was around 6 miles south and zoomed in.
     
  9. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The towers had windows all the way around and they are square. There is no "rear". :lol: Go ahead 7. Explain the fact there are no windows. Truthers use this tactic all the time.
     
  10. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I doubled the speed of WB11's last orb showing, and their first plane morph. The most notable difference besides the silly morph is the orb moves straight west to east but the cgi is turning more left/north. The wingless drone was shown 6-8 times, with the fake image making its debut only one minute after the last orb showing. The live orb and fake plane image cast their own shadow between the towers.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGEDvG9KQ&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=34&feature=plpp_video"]WPIX (WB11) 9/11 9:21 - 9:31 - YouTube[/ame]
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's nice.

    Why does the building in all those spammed gifs have no windows?

    That can't be the WTC.
     
  12. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Advance this clip to 5:34 and hear Lauer say it appears right of the screen but does not because this footage blurred out the orb. Matt Lauer said a small plane (the orb) circled the buildings when it aired live but later said it must've been a chopper.LOL The Today Show changed camera angles before the orb completed its path to explosion. Matt Lauer did exactly what everyone needed to do, dismiss the orb as something other than a plane and say it had to come from behind/south of the towers, not west headed straight for the west side of tower 2. It's very clear they weren't in on it but played along with what was supposed to really happen. A plane cannot circle any building and that impossibility required the elimination of the orb but that wasn't possible.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjWnQaOw-UI&feature=related"]NBC 9/11 9:23 - 9:33 - YouTube[/ame]
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xomUzh3QOg&feature=related"]NBC 9/11 9:02 - 9:12 - YouTube[/ame]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's nice.

    Why does the building in all those spammed gifs have no windows?

    That can't be the WTC.
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    That's nice.

    How could a real plane circle the south tower before impacting it?

    That can't be a real plane.:bored:
     
  15. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The towers had windows all the way around and they were rectangular. There is a "rear", meaning south side.:fart:
     
  16. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm the first 911 researcher to capture the bomb igniting in the south tower. Watch the northeast corner as it illuminates during ignition. The bomb farted backward and created explosions along the east side and drone's impact area on the southeast corner. BOO-YA! The drone was used as an ignition device and to have something in the area moving toward the buildings even though it wasn't a real plane. It was at least something people could eyewitness and call a small plane or remote controlled drone like Dick Oliver had.LOL

    [​IMG]
     
  17. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :lol: Any claim from a guy who claims a bomb farts should be stuffed in the trash with the rest of the whackjob theories that are out there. Funny how he thinks we should believe his theory of what a vastly pixelated video of the crash shows while ignoring all the people who were actually there and escaped. If the retarded theory of a bomb is to be believed, NOBODY should have escaped. Also, bombs only look like that in Hollywood. In real life high explosives have a very different look and feel.
     
  18. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It doesn't matter what anyone thinks the perps wanted us to believe. The nose-out was exposed during live coverage and faded to black upon noticing their mistake. That supports that it wasn't supposed to come through. I believe it was Aaron Brown who said it was an illusion.

    Only one relevant point has been made besides the simple truths I've posted on the live footage clearly showing a drone coming from the west. The fake plane could not explode because it wasn't a plane, it was a computer generated image. Had they created an impact explosion, they would have had to explain why no plane parts fell to the ground on the south side. They logically could not create an impact explosion because there was no plane to produce any plane parts in real-time. Note the drone just right of the southwest corner of tower one. It casts its own shadow left of the north hole with just fire coming from the northeast corner, no NOSE-OUT in any north view footage, live or not.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  19. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice quackjob theory, but total horse(*)(*)(*)(*). There are hundreds of videos of the impact of Flight 175 into the South Tower. Are they ALL faked? Why can't any "non-faked" ones be found? Oh right. Because the impact wasn't faked. :lol:
     
  20. Wolverine

    Wolverine New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    16,105
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They will believe anything but demand the utmost certainly to disbelieve.
     
  21. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Any claim from a guy who claims a plane impacted the south tower without any evidence should be stuffed in the trash with the rest of the whackjob theories out there. Funny how you think we should believe the plane myth with vastly pixelated videos of fake black planes with no windows, while ignoring many people who were actually on the ground and corrorborate something much smaller than a boeing. If the retarded theory of a plane is to be believed, there wouldn't be such clear evidence that no real plane impacted either tower because no video or photographic supports it. Also, fake planes look way more realistic in Hollywood than on 911.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'without any evidence'........I suppose the eyewitnesses don't count
     
  23. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There is video footage showing a drone and witnesses who either said a small plane, chopper, or drone. That corroboration is as good as it gets.
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not true....next
     
  25. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They saw fake imagery on TV. No plane hit the south tower because the live footage debunks it.:bored:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page