Not "have to be selective" but also not "must be all". It's obviously completely against the constitution what he is suggesting, but I don't...
This is going around in circles. I believe his actual words (as opposed to their practical effect) come short of what you're claiming. I've...
Of course To me, that's straining to defend a position (if you mean, therefore Trump was calling for the termination of the whole constitution)....
The slippery word is "allows". If I'm allowed to cancel all rules it doesn't mean I'm necessarily going to.
I basically agree with this, but when we're talking about the literal text of what he said, in typical Trumpian fashion he is vague enough to give...
I'd ask where I admitted that, but I suspect I'd just get back a bunch of irrelevant stuff.
I'm out actually does mean I'm out.
That is not even slightly an answer to the question. I suspect you're just trying to kick up dirt. The evident answer to my question, by the way,...
@yardmeat And?
In strict, literal terms, Trump didn't say the constitution should be terminated: "allows" is not "should". Very strictly speaking, he didn't even...
But this is exactly why the hyperbolic reporting is so dumb. By exaggerating, they give him the chance to say Fake News. If they just stuck with...
Where do I suggest they are sometimes the same thing?
How do you get that from this - "saying an agreement is terminated and an agreement is partly terminated are completely different things."?
Explain the last sentence.
Tell me what's wrong with my analogy. Be specific. Then explain why your analogy is better.
Separate names with a comma.
