You "proved" nothing - you merely offered your unsound and irrelevant opinion.
Nothing here changes the fact you "explained" nothing - you merely offered your unsound and irrelevant opinion.
As you know this is already in place -- since It took you a long time to research the validity of you arguments, you already know about strict...
You're lying to yourself. It does not matter in any way that you -expected- B to follow A That B follows A does not -demonstrate- A caused B - in...
And you'd be correct in doing so.
Funny how those all things are absent from your attempt to demonstrate the necessary relationship you claimed.
Please lay out your argument as to why a "non partisan" USSC would not uphold Heller. First, you have to define "non partisan" and tell us how you...
No. You offered your unsound and irrelevant opinion.
Ah. You don't understand that the burden of necessity lies with those that seek the restrictions. You know you cannot demonstrate said necessity,...
For someone took a long time to research the validity of your arguments, you should able to do much better than this. You should be able to...
If you do not understand how someone might not be a threat one day and be a threat a year later, there's no much I can do for you.
Ah, good. Now then: Please demonstrate the necessary relationship between the implementation of the restrictions you cite and the reduction of...
delete
As I said: the NY state police investigation was almost a year ago. It is -entirely- possible their assessment, at the time, was correct.
Were they? Their investigation was almost a year ago.
Separate names with a comma.
