This video says it better than I ever could. Romney did not run a campaign on any positive substantive theme in Fla. He ran a campaign of assassination. He has revealed his true colors. Who could respect him now? How can anyone believe anything he says? Again, Chris Mathews stated it far better than I ever could have in this video which some on this forum are trying to censor: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wzLIgJTtM8"]Deadly Duel - Romney & Gingrich, Chris Mathews Let me finish - YouTube[/ame]
This is a second duplicate thread on the same subject.. The 1st one you mentioned stuff and was crushed using your own weak criteria. Now you resort to video. How anybody gets rewarded with credits for duplicate threads is amazing.
Mebbe he gonna be the next FDR or LBJ... Romney actually wants to help 'poor people,' and the right isn't happy February 2, 2012 - Conservative pundits are ripping Mitt Romney over his stated willingness to fix the safety net for poor people who are 'falling through the cracks.' Why didn't he renounce dependency on government? they ask.
$17 million dollars for 50 delegates that now have to get divvied up proportionally. Hilarious. Romney is a fraud. I can't wait to see him fall.
Quote.. "Romney did not run a campaign on any positive substantive theme in Fla. He ran a campaign of assassination. " End quote. Anyone can see what you are doing right now is what you railed against. Where is the person you support ? You dont have the SEEDS to even show WHO ? in context against Romney. I attack others on their record ..SHOWING everyone who I support. When you can do the same you will have graduated to debate . 6 th grade.
When you're getting the kind of money Romney is getting, he can just keep throwing it in the fire to burn Newt. But it'll end up burning him in the end. (no pun intended)
Mitt Romney: The first candidate to buy his nomination outright. He will lose to Obama. Maybe the tea party can get it's act togeather and start supporting real conservatives again and we can take the senate.
You know that I wouldn't vote for Romney, but taking his words so out of context is silly. The smear machine at its finest. I so wish politics weren't such a cut throat business. Sadly, he isn't the only one who constantly gets smeared with half truths and make belief. Think about it.
Read the Thread title. 770,000 voted for Romney in Florida. 54 % of the latino Vote. I am just saying try matching words with records. If anything Nobody will vote for Paul has more than a grain of truth attached..but Why use that when we can focus on his foreign policy statements. NOW..not 25 years ago. WE can focus on Newts so called Historian work for 1.6 million for a failed government program...not on the actual work done..but how he tried to explain it away as not a concern. That wasn't 25 years ago .. that was what helped cause the mess we are in..not fix it.He is one of the insiders selling influence. If they made 12 million he would be using that ..rest assured. Santorum ? What can we use..? His record against allowing cheap Canadian drugs to be imported ? His corruption charges over home schooling ? He seems like such a nice guy..but he hasn't even come close after IOWA redo and cover up.If he hadn't been declared the winner and Romney later found those extra 40 votes..IT would still BE NEWS. Negativity is not showing a record...it is making a bad record up..or trying to show a flaw where one didn't exist. Interesting to note those with corruption in their record have tried to do this garbage to someone without it. While re inventing themselves as Family value men..and running on that issue alone in the deep south. Who wont get the votes.. ?? Newt ..Santorum and Paul..and now we have votes in states to back us up. Romney is electable...SEE NEVADA .
Who else will get the votes? Obama. Yes, Romney is electable, so is Obama. The only reason so many don't vote for Paul is because they don't want to know the truth. If, and that's a big IF, people would compare records side by side, Paul would win, every time. But, America will get what America wants, and we will continue as is, if not worse.
What can we make from this? E.g. will the establishment let Romney and Newt destroy eachother and finally let Paul win? Or do they see that Paul can't win and now start to finance and support Romney? Romney is more in the media currently? (you can use a stopwatch and time the amount of propaganda on each candidate)
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tACZQavangc"]Who Are You, Mitt Romney? (Tales of a Flip-Flopper) - YouTube[/ame] http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/19845418/2023db98-520c-44b4-9fd8-1f5b131a59f2.pdf
His Mormonism is going to be his downfall, unless America changes it's silly tune on Religion. A non-Christian as President? No chance.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUkuOB5YtNY&list=FLyX1RwwryY1BBv8x_pmDOUQ&index=9&feature=plpp_video"]Mitt Romney French Campaign Video - YouTube[/ame]
It won't be the Christians, otherwise he wouldn't have been the frontrunner coming out of SC. The leftist smear machine has started to rear its ugly head, digging into Mormons and their views on black skin color. We mustn't me gullible enough to think it won't be THE issue, esp if Romney should win the nomination and run against Obama. One should read the entire interpretation and not make more out of it than it is, some beliefs of old. Yet, its starting to circle the wagon, and we all know how efficient the smear machine can be. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain
Geez. He's even more revolting speaking in French. I just don't get how people can't see through this Phony Malony.
Listening to libs whine about someone runing neg ads is like listening to Al Capone whine about the crime rate in Chicago And this is the same Chris Matthews who has uttered these "civil" comments on his litle watched show
Libs have had a hsitory of showing their "tolerance" Here is a classic example [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aWjIpkxcak"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aWjIpkxcak[/ame]
Why many will not vote for Romney ? Nevada 71 % of Vote. Romney..11,822.. 48 % Gingrich .. 5,623 ..23 % Paul..4,619 ..!8 % Santorum...2,749.. 11% Delegate total so far... Romney 97 newt..31 Paul 14 CNN data used. The facts do not support the claim that many will not vote for Romney. It will need to be said that many do not support the others outside their One CHURCH based support zone...and One SOUTHERN 5 state home of evangelical power. Take THAT vote away from Santorum and Gingrich and you get NOTHING. IOWA and SC do NOT represent the Americans voting base that is needed to beat President Obama.They are a PART and appreciated but not any total. Take the MORMON vote away from Romney and he still wins. Telling indeed.
As I have said before, as the Hope and Change Express rolls along and peole lose their jobs and homes - the one candidate who will unite the R's to make Obama a one termer is Pres Obama
Of course, Romney will win. The folks that run this country don't like a gamble. Romney or Obama, it really doesn't matter at that point.