I don't Know why he would be. Most libs don't even know which end of the gun the bullet comes out of.
One strange misconception I never understand is the one that "libs" don't have guns. Aaaanywho, this thread just looks like more class envy to me. MObama is a wealthy woman. She can go on vacation when she (*)(*)(*)(*) well pleases. And as the wife of the democratically elected President of the United States, she is entitled to a security detail.
The Obama's pay for their own vacation. AND the SS protection for the Republican candidates goes on ALL the time, not just on the campaign stops. "Hullo? Anyone home in there?"
Oh please, you people are pathetic, BFD that she goes skiing. If someone offered you free accommodation at a luxury home at a ski resort I'm sure you'd turn it down, ya' right. What a bunch of whiny nit-pickers.
Michelle Antoinette is indeed a wealthy woman who can go on vacation at taxpayer expense whenever she pleases. She's also an ungrateful woman with a grudge against the country that has given her so much.
Because he would get shoes thrown at him I'm a Tennessee liberal, with 14 guns and an expert shot with all of them. Quit generalizing.
As usual the left never gets tired of dishonestly framing this argument. No one questions MObama's right to go on yet another vacation. But with the worst economic record since the Great Depression of the '30s the question has always been should Michelle go on yet another vacation while the public suffers through her husband's head in ass economic leadership? These commercials about the Imperial Obamas will write themselves and I can't wait until the real presidential campaign begins. Let people decide for themselves if they want Marie Antoinette Obama back in office sucking off the public teat while they shiver in the cold and dark.
I never thought of Bush as having very thin skin like Obama seems to have. If you watch the video he rather calmly ducked the shoe without falling apart at all. As for libs with guns there are of course exceptions. The Soviets were the rock stars of liberalism in their day and they have the AK-47 to their credit as the best assault rifle so far.
The "taxpayers expense"? I assume you're talking about her security detail. Do you have evidence of how much more it would cost in Aspen than in Washington?
Why not? I don't know if you've seen the news lately, but the economy is on its way up. MObama isn't running the country. She's the presidents wife. I'm not sure what staying in Washington would accomplish. Your ODS is getting severe.
Did she fly commercial? The expense to the government to protect her and cater to her every want is considerable and 6 to 7 vacations a year would be excessive even for most queens.
I wonder...have you seen the economy lately? It's still awful! You guys finally lift your heads out of the cesspool and you think everything is all rosy...incredible. As far as I can tell no one is under the impression Michelle Obama runs the country. What would staying in Washington for awhile accomplish? It would send a message that I'm not going to rub your noses in the dirt by living it up while all you peasants suffer. Not as severe as your Obama brown nosing syndrome is.
Wasn't she black when he got elected? Can't see how Obama being in office for over 3 years makes anybody a racist. Grasping for straws again?
Oh my goodness. Get over it. The only people who think this is even remotely an issue are those who are so beyond irrational hatred of the Obama's that even stopping at a Petco is the end of the god(*)(*)(*)(*) world. Seriously, why don't you guys complain about something that matters?
This story isn't very newsworthy. Rich people go on vacations, big deal... and all politicians claim to be the champions of the poor.
Please tell us the last First Lady that lived in poverty. Please tell us the last First Lady that never travelled and spent all her time sitting in the WH.
Sure it does. Jealously over the Obama election win should have resided by now. At this point, it's just about race.
Hogwash! Do you have any idea how much it cost the taxpayers to take Bush to Crawford on AF1 plus another plane with his motorcade on it plus transporting his staff (personal chef) and SS agents to Crawford just for a weekend? What the taxpayers paid to secure his ranch and construct a building to install communication systems, warning systems, bunkers, housing for the SS, housing for administration officials that either had to go with him or fly back and forth from Crawford to DC cost more than any vacations the Obamas have taken or will take while they're in office. Bush DID prefer the ranch to the WH - IMPO he was uncomfortable in the WH because he knew he shouldn't be there.
I get it. While America lingers through the toughest times since the 1930's and people are genuinely suffering you don't think it matters what the First Family does. I'll bet you had a different view when Bush was in office.
Oh, of course. No one could possibly disagree with President Obama on any political or ethical grounds. It MUST be all about race!