Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...ugh-policy-is-well-not-20130220#ixzz2LaUt53u6 Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook So can someone explain to me why a socialist/communist that Obama supposedly is, doesn't use the anger towards the banks, and Wall Street to break up too big to fail companies? I mean every financial expert in the world says the banks need to be broken up, and yet the Socialist Obama refuses to even prosecute them? What kind of sense does that make?
Only Obama's naive voters think he is anti-bank or anti-Wall Street. Under Obama, Wall Street has raked in record profits, while the rest of the economy goes into the dumps. And they reward Obama generously. All his talk about punishing the "rich" or making them pay their "fair share" is puffery and nonsense. He doesn't mean a word of it.
Hypothetically, if we solved poverty in our republic, would we really need to care how much persons make in the private sector in our republic?