Unfortunately we will Strike Syria.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by AboveAlpha, Sep 23, 2013.

  1. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I have known this for some time as after I was told to stand down I KNEW something was up.

    Now we have the USS. Nuclear Carrier Group Harry S. Truman...as well as we have sent the USS. Nimitz Nuclear Carrier Group and if need we could have a 3rd and 4th carrier in striking distance of Syria within 3 to 5 days...although I highly doubt that a 3rd or 4th Nuclear Carrier would be needed given the total disparity in Military Capability between Syria and the U.S. Military.

    What I am worried about is if they decide to use very specific and specialized weapons that would be dropped as Smart Munitions for the air. These U.S. Weapons have an extremely high yield and a single bomb which can vaporize Chemical Weapons either stored as Munitions on in Tanks....has the explosive force of a Small Nuclear Weapon.

    To use these weapons would kill tens of thousands of Syrians.

    AboveAlpha
     
  2. Silver Surfer

    Silver Surfer Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    6,871
    Likes Received:
    2,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah...We all know soldiers are at liberty to discuss classified information in online forums. It is a standard procedure. Give people a break. Anyway the real target is Iran. It has always been. By the way, Iran and Syria have a mutual defense pact.
     
  3. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I am not Military.

    Syrian Leadership especially Assad....makes a CUT from the money sent from Iran to be used by Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas which is in turn used to fight Israel.

    The Syrian Regime receives a Percentage of the total money sent to it by Iran which usually might be U.S. CASH that is delivered by Iran's Qud's Force.

    AboveAlpha
     
  4. SyrianGirl1982

    SyrianGirl1982 New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not in a million years. USA the big giant bankrupt paper tiger.


    Russia drew a red line. If Syria is attacked, Iran is getting any Russian weapons system they want no questions asked. That includes the S-400 and S -300.
     
  5. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Look...I really hope we won't have to attack Syria. I really do.

    But when you see 2 Nuclear USN. Carrier Groups within striking distance of Syria and another two Carrier Groups 2 to 5 days out....well...that say's something.

    You can forget about the Russian's getting involved as if they did...not only would we kick their asses...but they would lose Favored Nation Trading Status with the U.S. and E.U.

    AboveAlpha
     
  6. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Oh...and if Russia was stupid enough to supply Iran with advanced weapons...which we could handle easily anyway's...we would be inclined to supply several former Soviet Satellite States U.S. Weapons.

    AboveAlpha
     
  7. SyrianGirl1982

    SyrianGirl1982 New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you can deal with them easily then why was US and Israel crying when Russia planned to sell it? If they can defeat it, then why fear it?

    What former USSR countries can USA support? Georgia? That's pretty much it.... I am sure Georgia and USA still remember what happened the last time they pissed Russia off in 2008.
     
  8. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hope no one believes this Alpha person. This has been all over beforeitsnews.com and infowars.com
    Both are fringe conspiracy sites where people like Alpha go to rile the freaks up.
     
  9. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Just because we can defeat something doesn't mean we want a country like Iran to posses Advanced Russian Weapons that could be used in any regional war.

    Russia is no longer in any way on the same level and capability as the U.S....and although Russia does have many Nuclear Weapons...Russia does realize that the U.S. also has many and that ours are much more accurate and reliable.

    It is estimated that over 60% of Russian Nuclear Missile Forces are in a great state of disrepair as Nuclear Missiles and Warheads must be CONSTANTLY MAINTENANCE...something the Russian Military has not had the funds to do.

    But the main reason that Russia will not attempt to draw the ire of the United States is ECONOMIC. If Russia was to do something stupid the U.S. with it's allies could effectively bring the Russian Economy to a collapse.

    As well....Russia and Putin is very well informed about U.S. Space Commands capability of Direct Energy Weapons as well as both the U.S. Air Force's ABM/ASAT's and the U.S. Navy's SM-3 ABM/ASAT...of which one of these SM-3's recently targeted just the Hydrazine Booster Fuel Tank aboard a failing U.S. Satellite and this Satellite traveling at 18,000 mph at ORBITAL DISTANCE....had that tank HIT PERFECTLY AND DIRECTLY by an SM-3 fired of the USN. Lake Erie....and Aegis Cruiser.

    Thus the Russian's cannot be certain their Nuclear Missiles would be able to make it through U.S. Missile and Laser Defense Networks.

    AboveAlpha
     
  10. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    What I have posted is a FACT and you can easily Google exactly where the Nimitz Carrier Battle Group is currently as well as the Harry S. Truman Carrier Battle Group.

    The U.S. Navy DOES NOT move Nuclear Carrier Groups into the RED SEA unless they intend to use them.

    AboveAlpha
     
  11. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Russia, Iran, Syria are not the enemy. The enemy is the US military complex that creates wars and destabilizes the world.
     
  12. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Try to tell that to the former nations that were once Soviet Satellite States.

    AboveAlpha
     
  13. unskewedewd

    unskewedewd New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All of this became inevitable when Syria refused to allow a pipeline across its borders from Qatar to supply natural gas to Europe as an alternative to Russia's near monopoly. The US will crush Russia one way or another, and in so doing the entire BRICS bloc's ability to resist the will of interests within NATO countries. All the "diplomacy" exercised between the US, Russia and Syria was an unavoidable delay because of the Secretary of State's gaffe. The US/NATO has systematically been targeting both China and Russia by any means available to them other than direct military action since at least the "election" of George W. Bush. This will not end well for Syria. I've been saying it all along, since Obama drew the "red line." It probably won't end well for any of us.

    edit: [MENTION=63414]Silver Surfer[/MENTION]
    Iran may be next, but it isn't the end goal.
     
  14. Thehumankind

    Thehumankind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    That would be catastrophic if the sinister Assad,
    would place the chemical stockpile in a civilian populated area.
    The US should think twice.
     
  15. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The US has harmed more countries than USSR.
     
  16. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Assad has Chemical Weapons stored in sites that are within large population centers.

    Saddam did something NONE of us expected...he shipped his very large cache of Chemical Weapons to Syria...as Assad's Father and Saddam were sworn enemies. We watched Real Time Satellite coverage of the Iraqi trucks driving from Iraq into Syria.

    So now Assad the son has a MASSIVE amount of Chemical Weapons.

    AboveAlpha

    - - - Updated - - -

    You are delusional.

    Do you have any idea the Millions of people not only in other countries but in the Soviet Union as well that Stalin killed?

    AboveAlpha
     
  17. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would take too long to name everything the US has done but just to name a couple:

    Nuked 2 cities.
    Assisted Iraq in gassing Iranians.
    Experimented on Central american prisoners.
    Bombed a pharmaceutical corp in Sudan that helped the poor afford life saving drugs, killing tens of thousands
    Regime change / attempted regime change in dozens and dozens and dozens of countries, installing and supporting dictators.
    War on drugs policies that have killed hundreds of thousands in the Americas.
    Training terrorists to attack countries.

    And you have to go back to the Stalin era lulz. I do' not

    You are the real terrorist.
     
  18. unskewedewd

    unskewedewd New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I'm pretty sure the US has thought about this a lot more than twice. Syria is a means to an end, and the US isn't worried about civilian casualties. It wants to remove Assad, and it will.
     
  19. Thehumankind

    Thehumankind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    As what Saddam did before,
    Assad also does have the magic tricks to make things disappear,
    and falsify his diabolic and un-Syrian ways.
     
  20. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    With the help of the United States of America. A war crime.
     
  21. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I never said the U.S. was perfect...but it has done a Hell of a lot more good then bad.

    AboveAlpha
     
  22. Cdnpoli

    Cdnpoli Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    6,013
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
     
  23. unskewedewd

    unskewedewd New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can play the "who is worse" game back and forth as long as you want, and you won't run out of nasty instances perpetrated by either side. It always works that way when you compare two powers with a imperial goals and means
     
  24. Thehumankind

    Thehumankind Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Yup, it will be tricky,
    if tomahawks surgical flight would start.
    Missiles and rockets from within Damascus would also start occupying the airspace of Syria,
    targeting civilian population with chemical stockpile, then blame the US at the aftermath.
    A scenario that this Assad capable of killing his own people would do.
     
  25. unskewedewd

    unskewedewd New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    meh... maybe for a while, but definitely since the beginning of the Cold War, I'd say we've had quite a slump.
     

Share This Page