Can I convince PF's resident 'Truthers' that AA77 hit the Pentagon? - Take Two

engine damage? what engine damage? who said that?

did it hit a flock of bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on way in?

 

Are the eyewitnesses who saw the flight hit light poles lying?...What caused those light poles to be found in the condition the were found?

 

so they are saying the light pole mower is real. LOL

 

Steve Riskus: "I could see the "American Airlines" logo...It knocked over a few light poles in its way."

Mark Bright: "...at the height of the street lights. It knocked a couple down."

Mike Walter: "...it clipped one of these light poles ... and slammed right into the Pentagon right there. It was an American Airlines jet."

Rodney Washington: "...knocking over light poles"

Kirk Milburn: "I heard a plane. I saw it. I saw debris flying. I guess it was hitting light poles."

Afework Hagos: "It hit some lampposts on the way in."

D.S. Khavkin: "First, the plane knocked down a number of street lamp poles."

Wanda Ramey: "I saw the wing of the plane clip the light post, and it made the plane slant.

Penny Elgas: A piece of American Airlines Flight 77 was torn from the plane as it clipped a light pole. It landed in her car. Now in the Smithsonian Institution's 9/11 collection.

Lincoln Liebner: "It was probably about thirty feet off the ground, clipping the lampposts."

 

Your gif koko, is taken from Mike Wilsons reconstruction;

In which the right engine takes damage from the light poles its hitting, and begins to produce a large amount of white smoke. Your gif has this smoke trail edited out (in fact, you can even see the shadow of it still in your gif). I'm asking why you have edited it out?

Yours;


The original;

 

Wow, looks like Koko is taking quite the beating over here. Good to know he can still claim victory.

 

has anyone investigated these people yet?

They should be brought up on fraud charges.

- - - Updated - - -

well the engine could not have been damaged unless it was damaged by a flock of bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on the way in

 

Clearly, it's beyond koko's ability to modify those images, but he doesn't seem to have a problem using a truthbag link that purposefully changed it.

Honest clown is honest.

 

shhh....newt thinks its a real plane.

I think its (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hilarious!

there is no way that the engine could have hit anything at all.

so seriously (*)(*)(*)(*)ed

 

Non-responsive clown is non-responsive

 

I know troughers never respond they only duck and dodge

 

The Members of The Church of Conspiracy ..are true believers....and will NEVER Deny the tenets of the troofer FAITH!

 

I can review the evidence. you know like a judge.

and compare fantasy:



to reality




and your light poles fail.

 

How about you address the fact that you linked a truthbag image that was clearly modified from the original. Why was that done?

Focus clown, focus.

 

this is the sort of INANE geometircally IMPOSSIBLE PROOF thses bozos offer to support thier theory.

GOTTA LOVE those question marks though!!

​

WILEY COYOTE SCIENCE!!!

 

You mean that (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up cad mock up?

 

What, you have proof these people are lying?...what proof is that? Let's see it.

 

trougher science! lol

 

THE FAMOUS WILEY COYOTE Hyppothesis

all objects moving at extreme speed retain their original shape upon impact....and after...

THANK YOU!!

 

Do you believe a pumpkin can be shot through a boat?

 

yeh but those 911 planes were special invincible planes.

real planes burst into flames



when they hit objects

 

is that a ZEN Question?

- - - Updated - - -

when they objects to what ...there Sapphire??

 

he thinks the planes were traveling at warp 9



not to mention that mysterious shadow = plane

 

Do you believe a pumpkin can be propelled to penetrate both side of a boat? It's a simple Yes of No question.

 

what a dumb question, everyone believes that





and a mosquitos fly through winshields too.