The angry white guy, in summary

I've already heard about MANY positive outcomes as your own.

- - - Updated - - -

Exactly. He is VERY Kennedy-like.

 

OH, puh-lease!! Did they shut down the government? Did they default on our debt? How in the world can you compare the tea party action to any other action. You foolishly tried to stop an existing law. The CR had nothing to do with that law. Proof: the law is still being implemented. But you have shut down the government even though you lost on your initial objective. Now you are keeping the government shut down until you can "save face", ugh.

You have no advise because you do not live in the real world.

 

I can't say that I dislike any race per se, but I do have this feeling that the diversity of human appearance and our cultures is something worth preserving. It's more of a conservation thought. I guess it's the same feeling environmentalists feel about not wanting trees and animals go extinct, and to preserve biological diversity.

As for wheter societies are more stable as homogenous.. It really depends. It's not race per se, nor religion or language or even culture. All that matters is the identities people feel that they have, and how they percieve others. A country needs to be based on an identity of some kind. An identity makes people more willing to contribute to the common good, because they have a 'us' feeling about it. If there's no unifying identity, and instead several separate identities that will probably not lead to a civil war right away, but if things go sour for some reason -like in an economic recession- human nature will kick in and that's when we get things like jugoslavia. Simply put, the people didn't feel they were part of a greater jugoslavian identity but rather more felt croat or slovene. Race, religion, language, and culture are things that identities are very commonly based upon. Why that is, you have to ask a psychologist: I'm just describing reality here.

 

You are misinformed.

In Europe. America. Australia. Canada.

Diversity. Women.

Of course, you don't know the guy.

There already are quotas. But you are correct.

Its all the stuff he has said since I have been reading his posts since as long as I have been here. Even non-white people are more pro-white than he is.

Yeah.

People categorize themselves by their race. Look at college. The Asians people stay together, so do the blacks. I live in a diverse area that is 20 percent white. In prison too. Immigration reform is another example of people starting to group up by their race, like Mexicans for example.

That's not what I claimed.

You are more likely to love someone who looks like you and is genetically similar than someone who is different.

Yes, but I like human diversity.

Yeah, and i'd like to preserve that.

It would be nice.

No, colored eyes are recessive. Dark eyes are not attractive. Neither is dark skin and hair.

 

How is this different from diversity quotas?

 

Uh, intent and effect?

 

Well, obviously it sits under the bleached bones of all of the native Americans that the whites killed when they stole their land.

 

The point by point, tell me how he's a centrist in the examples I gave. Printing money like it's Big Chief tablets is a centrist position? I know he hasn't socialized the financial industry like you'd hoped for, but isn't Consumer Protection Bureau a pretty liberal idea?

 

Well, for one, we aren't going to let some racist stormfront types engage in ethnic cleansing because they don't like diversity in our society, so that dog won't hunt.
What's plan B?
Pitch a fit? Move to another country where racism is embraced? Grow up?

 

Oh my- you think those are your mythical 'white man's land'?

LOL

America- never been 'white man's land'- White men have just been the majority for a brief blip in history.

Anyway- thanks for the white supremacists viewpoint, but I think that the answer is just no- your position is unacceptable.

 

The government is not "shut down". Some of the bloat is sitting at home right now is all. The so-called shutdown has been a wimpy 17% reduction. That's a good start, but no more. To put it in perspective, under Obama, there are 21,925 government employees. Minus 17%, that makes 18198 employees, which is still more than Reagan had in a fully staffed government. http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2013/01/24/the-growth-of-the-federal-government-1980-to-2012/ This talk of a shutdown is pure BS.

 

Don't you know? Institutionalized racism is only bad unless it discriminates against white people. Race can be used against whites, and that's fine. You can have Affirmative action, the Congressional black caucus, NAACP, and whatever else, but don't you dare try to promote YOUR race. As whites are inferior, they aren't afforded that privilege.

 

Uh, those numbers are ridiculous.

I looked at your source. You should read a bit more carefully. Also, you should spend a few more years continuing your education, so you have enough general knowledge not to make bonehead mistakes.

 

Bravo Sir! You just proved the right wing BS against Obamacare was simply BS. Kudos.

 

Its okay with you for the government to promote non-white diversity but not white homogeneity?

 

Oh, really? Well then, instead of snark, perhaps you could say why the Forbes numbers are "ridiculous".

 

When we go into default, you'll probably say we didn't really go into default either. The sure is some pure BS going on here, for sure, and it permiates from the right.

 

So you're saying a 17% reduction in government is a shutdown?

 

If one is among that 17%, they'd probably say yes.

 

Please, numerous sources said that we are shutdown. Being military and seeing many things I have, also tells me that is true.

 

Define "shut down". The government is 83% operational. I thought libs were supposed to be "glass is half full" people. Hell, the glass is 83% full, and you're calling it empty.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, I'm not, and neither are the remaining 83% of government workers, so I guess the concensus is no.

 

Good for you! So long as you're good, that's all that really matters huh?

 

I'm good, most people are good, so yeah, that fraction of gov jobbers doesn't really concern me. Besides, they knew this was coming, so they shouldn't be unprepared. They are getting a paid vacation, how terrible for them!

 

I think state, city and federal employees should all be eliminated. When the people who work for cities, or local governments, it'll hit home. Cut them all.....then watch and see who whines.

 

<<<MOD EDIT: Deleted post removed>>>

That means you too then buddy. Anybody who works for government, or is paid by the governent, locally, or nationally, needs to go. Let's get serious about saving money.