USA planing for WW#3?

Ridiculous. What does America stand to gain by having another Arab country to deal with?

 

The time will come and USA will evaporate itself. There are many reasons for that...
You are right... Russian-speaking people... They are not russians... ... For you it may be no difference... Russian-speaking... But mainly they are not russians... Mainly they are Ukrainians (Russian-speaking too).
Ukraine is poor county. People immigrates from Ukraine mainly. Ukrainians are like austrian Germans... Russian-speaking too, but they are not russians...

The vast majority of Russian's do not regard the United States, do not intend to vizit your country... USA made a lot of evil to Russia. Look at this forum and you understand what the vast majority of Russian's think about US.

I vizit Thailand, China, India, Egypt, Ukraine, Belorussia, Kazakstan, Lithuania. I have no desire to vizit USA... I know nobody of my friends who want to vizit USA...

Good luck

 

MILLIONS of American's have no desire to destroy Russia ... but USA, as a state, have desire to destroy Russia and any other country in the World.

The Time have passed when USA was a simbol of prosperity.

 

Small Step by small step USA destroy and disintegrate any country in the World intending to create small semistates...
Small semistate can`t defend itself and it can be robbed easier by american monopoly`s...

For example British empire, French empire, Yugoslavia, Libia, USSR...

 

Yep, the bankster control everything, not the capitalists (speak free entrepreneurs).
BTW, Bolsheviks did not abolish the banking system, they just abolished free enterprise, and created a sate owned production system, and that system was good for banksters.

The western countries become more and more similar to the former state owned capitalism of the SU.

The banksters do not take any risks any more, they own the state and the taxpayers have to pay for their mistakes.
In a nutshell: The banksters have created "financial Communism" for themselves!

Agree!

If there is no real freedom of speech (speak if the finances and the media outlets are owned by a small ethnocentric minority that can easily bribe the candidates and mesmerize the voters), then the whole election becomes just a pathetic farce, like it is today in most western countries.

 

how can there be any reference to what never happened? Saddam and Gaddafi and Assad did not murder anyone, not to mention millions. West media cocncocted the whole story, that's it.

 

Did USA have any problems with Arabs or Muslims before Israel was created?

Do you know that Beirut was called the Paris of the Orient?
It was a beautiful and well developed city, and all Arab countries were on the road to modernity.

Islam was not an issue at all... till Zionists started their ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

BTW, about 30% of expelled Palestinians were Christians, and Palestinian Christians were amongst the primary actors in the PLO.

 

The US military budget is designed to acquire and maintain the playgrounds of U.S. citizens, and other players.

 

Well, western allies were and are great masters in concocting stories, and they learned a lot from the Soviets (their former allies) during WWII.

 

this has nothing to do neither with economy nor Putin, because Russians' migration to the West is dated by the 1990s when they fled the aftermaths of USSR being destroyed.

 

Muslim Arabs have done nothing with the Middle East accept turn it into a troubled region. I am not sure they have even invented anything.

 

...and afterwards, and carried on with perfecting that skill to such an extent that the Soviets look pale now in comparison to West ideologists!

 

USA is just an instrument of globalists, and they will throw this instrument away like a used condom, after they established their global power structures.

USA is disintegrating, too.

Today USA is just a joke compared to what it once was.

The demographic situation in the USA is rapidly changing, the Europeans will soon become a minority there.

And when USA becomes (demographically) similar to Brazil, then its power will be reduced to the power of Brazil, too.

There is almost no manufacturing left in the USA, this country is becoming more and more insignificant, and one day people will just throw away the green-back, and that will be the end of the USA.

Huge piles of weapons cannot preserve an Empire from collapse, because Empires are destroyed from within.

 

Yes, fully agree with that, too.

The Soviet propaganda was very primitive, and therefore innocuous.
The western propaganda is much more sophisticated, and that is why it is so dangerous.

In a nutshell: sophisticated lies are more dangerous than primitive lies!

 

since long ago the West has built a mass media machine that tells not only lies but also half-truth which is far worse a thing than only telling lies, even if the methods for that lies were taken by West spin doctors from dr.Goebbels himself.

 

The Middle East became a troubled region after the creation of Israel.

 

more precisely AFTER the influx of European Zionist Jews. who arrived with Herzl's plan "Der Judenstaat " to displace/dispossess the indigenous non Jewish Palestinians

(wink)

 

What does Israel have to do with some putative World War?

 

Well, it is a known fact that the foreign policy of the USA is controlled by the Israel Lobby.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy

http://www.amazon.com/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501

http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0040.pdf

 

"Well, it is a known fact that the foreign policy of the USA is controlled by the Israel Lobby."

Taxcutter says:
Yeah, right. How does a world war benefit Israel?

 

"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy[1] is a book by John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt,"

A book? This is proof of something? And, a much criticized book it seems;

"Marvin Kalb, a lecturer in public policy, and former Director and now Senior Fellow[46] at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, said that the paper failed to meet basic quality standards for academic research.[16] Ruth Wisse, a professor of Yiddish Literature and Comparative Literature, wrote, "When the authors imply that the bipartisan support of Israel in Congress is a result of Jewish influence, they function as classic conspiracy theorists who attribute decisions to nefarious alliances rather than to the choices of a democratic electorate".[47] David Gergen, a professor of public service at the Kennedy School at Harvard, wrote that the charges in the paper are "wildly at variance with what I have personally witnessed in the Oval Office over the years"[48] Alan Dershowitz, professor of law at Harvard University, wrote a report challenging the factual basis of the paper, the motivations of the authors and their scholarship. Dershowitz contends that, "The paper contains three types of major errors: quotations are wrenched out of context, important facts are misstated or omitted, and embarrassingly weak logic is employed."[49]

Daniel W. Drezner, who was also a University of Chicago political scientist until he was denied tenure in 2005, contends that Walt and Mearsheimer "vastly overestimate both pro-Israel lobby's causal role -- and their uniformity of opinion and motivation." He called the paper a "(*)(*)(*)(*)-poor, monocausal social science. To repeat, the main empirical problems with the article are that: A) They fail to demonstrate that Israel is a net strategic liability; B) They ascribe U.S. foreign policy behavior almost exclusively to the activities of the "Israel Lobby"; and C) They omit consideration of contradictory policies and countervailing foreign policy lobbies.[50]

Benny Morris, a widely quoted Israeli scholar on the Israeli-Arab conflict and a professor of Middle East history at Ben-Gurion University, prefaced a very detailed analysis with the remark: "Like many pro-Arab propagandists at work today, Mearsheimer and Walt often cite my own books, sometimes quoting directly from them, in apparent corroboration of their arguments. Yet their work is a travesty of the history that I have studied and written for the past two decades. Their work is riddled with shoddiness and defiled by mendacity."[51]

Other critics include Johns Hopkins University professor Eliot A. Cohen;[11] University of Maryland history professor Jeffrey Herf;[52] Columbia University journalism professor Samuel G. Freedman;[53] Princeton University professor of politics and international affairs Aaron Friedberg;[54] Stanford University political science adjunct professor Josef Joffe;[55] and Norman Finkelstein.[56]"

"Well known fact" huh?

Please support your poo with something other than a book.

 

"The Palestine Mandate

"Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country"

 

Dont forget after operation cyclone. Look at the charts of terrorism increases since mujahideen was being funded by the CIA, terrorism went through the roof.

 

Its a no brainer, its because they're American.

 

They had the same education every Russian had, the wonders of Communisim.