no planes on 9-11. no fires on 9-11. no building damage on 9-11. yeah, Truther arguments are real intelligent.
Off topic. Defeated and shamed, the 'truthers' immediately try to derail the thread. The OP remains a strawman argument.
smoke damage is not fire and I referring to wtc2 not wtc1 LOL and how did those windows get broken out on that side of the building? Did 2 planes hit wtc2?
Obviously since we can see the windows were not broken in the pic I posted how did they get broken did the plane circle around for a second round at the other side?
Can't prove the perfectly hidden in plain sight 'black ops' operation so, it didn't happen. You can't prove it definitely, EXACTLY how it was carried out, and with "official" acknowledgement, then it didn't happen. We gotcha.
thats how propagandists operate. if it doesnt have da gubmint good housekeeping seal it didnt happen. Of course the stalins and hitlers love these guys. Couldnta come into power without them - - - Updated - - - plastics make an incredible amount of smoke and very little flame in a contained area. Once again how did the windows get broken on the side of the building that incurred NO DAMAGE what so ever eh? go ahead put the picture in paint and draw a nice circle around all that fire that you cant see in WTC2! then repost it but wait so I can finish my coffee first LOL
coming from someone who thinks footprint means every spec of dust and debris piles up in the basement that conclusion surprises no one.
Actually, 9/11 is a subtle message. It has been prepared for decades. It was not meant to be perfect. There's leakages in it all over but they don't mind it that much. Though I think it went a little bit too imperfect for how they wanted it to be. But the recepients of this message are meant to be a certain % of the world population who do have the required intuition to understand it. People do not read about the powerful symbols behind the number 11 which the Twin Towers were built to represent.
Nope. Logic goes: They are the most likely and had the vastly superior means to have done it so they are the principal suspects.
Read PNAC's manifesto. If you read PNAC's manifesto your jaws will drop. It will bewilder you how they could write & even publish such shameless stuff in a time as modern as the year 2000. Here it is: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf You don't even need to reach the notorious page 51. After going only through the preface and the first pages, you will know who did 9/11 and why and even how.
ziggy stardust is the neo cons and neo libs role model, and these guys either dont know or are oblivious to that fact.
A clear cut case of seeing what you want to see.....you even try to slight it by giving it the pseudosinister tag 'manifesto'. NOTHING in the plan says who 'did 9/11' Besides,we already KNOW,and it wasn't ANY element of this government.
Why am I not surprised someone who asks loaded questions let a classic loaded question fly over their head.
Ya know, for something that's supposed to be a 'no brainer', certain folks spend a terrifically huge amount of time defending what is supposed to be 'completely baseless'. The not guilty, certainly seem to 'act' very guilty.
