Disney to pull funding from Boy Scouts if they don't allow Homosexual leaders

Just make it so gay-males lead Brownie packs, with rank of Fairy King, while lesbians lead Scout packs with a rank of Zena Racksha.

 

Since procreation is your side's flavor of the month in defining the difference between homosexuals and Heterosexuals, perhaps you can answer me this?

Penis into WOman's Anus or Mouth is?

Afterall, you and Tex believe procreation is the ONLY reason why folks can't be homosexuals by birth or genetic in any way.

Surely you all know you can't procreate by shoving your penis into a WOman's anus or mouth too....right? Are they freaks that shouldn't be allowed the same as couples who have sex the traditional vaginal way?

Just curious to see how far you all actually feel about this (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Best to exclude Godless pagans and commies---basically anyone that would still vote for Obama if he could still run.

Blacks and Jews in political power here in the US tend to be strongly anti-Christian. Their choice.

 

Please tell me you're joking.

 

Disney went south a long time ago. The BSA is a lost cause. The Gay Mafia has corrupted the entire useful idiot media.

 

No different at all. Even though most heterosexual males do not have an attraction towards little girls, some do. I wouldn't risk it. The same concept applies here. Pedophiles will almost always seek out jobs where they have access to children. This is definitely one of those jobs. A night alone with a bunch of children and nobody around... a gay pedophile's dream.

 

You highlighted the wrong part of my post (presumably to try to distract from the relevant part).

The survey was of people identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. That doesn't automatically imply behaviour, "deviant" or otherwise. It certainly doesn't mean none of the 92.2% who replied "no" automatically don't engage in "deviant" behaviour (and by your definition, I'm sure many do).

To claim that this survey shows that 3.4% (or 3.6%) of people engage in deviant behaviour is an outright lie. You sec, are a liar.

 

Look at all of the right-wing socialists trying to dictate the business policies of Disney. It's just like they did with A&E a few months ago. Us liberal capitalists, especially us business owners, could to teach them a thing or two.

Great pragmatic question, but you won't get an honest answer... as you and I know, this sham isn't about procreation as much as hatred of a certain group.



'Tis a sad time for all of those neglected vaginas. This graph is interesting. The CDC considers 6% of the male population (in the specified age group) to have had gay sex. Maybe Ken Cuccinelli wanted to ban oral and anal sex to bring attention back to the vagina.... especially considering the noticeable popularity of oral sex.

 

Well I am sure that is what you have convinced yourself of.

It appears to be your equivelant of "1 drop of black blood makes you a negro"

I don't know whether you really believe that if a man rapes a 2 year old girl- and only rapes baby girls- that means he is a heterosexual- or whether you just can't stand the idea of homosexuals and so in your mind you conflate them with homosexual pedophiles.

So I will refer to experts

http://focus.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=53036

Pedophiles are subdivided into several classifications. One of the first distinctions made when classifying pedophiles is to determine whether they are "exclusively" attracted to children (exclusive pedophile) or attracted to adults as well as children (nonexclusive pedophile). In a study by Abel and Harlow (15) of 2429 adult male pedophiles, only 7% identified themselves as exclusively sexually attracted to children, which confirms the general view that most pedophiles are part of the nonexclusive group.

So first thing we learn is that 7% of pedophiles are not even attracted to adults of any sex.

Pedophiles are usually attracted to a particular age range and/or sex of child. Research categorizes male pedophiles by whether they are attracted to only male children (homosexual pedophilia), female children (heterosexual pedophilia), or children from both sexes (bisexual pedophilia) (3, 6, 10, 29).

Then we learn that pedophiles are attracted to different types of children- and depending upon that they are considered homosexual pedophiles or heterosexual pedophiles. This term is unrelated to which adult- if any- they are attracted to.

The percentage of homosexual pedophiles ranges from 9% to 40%, which is approximately 4 to 20 times higher than the rate of adult men attracted to other adult men (using a prevalence rate of adult homosexuality of 2%—4%) (5, 7, 10, 19, 29, 30). This finding does not imply that homosexuals are more likely to molest children, just that a larger percentage of pedophiles are homosexual or bisexual in orientation to children

Here Drs Hall are pointing out that the rate of homosexual pedophiles is a higher percentage than the rate of homosexuals in the general population.

Note the distinction that they specifically make

I know you are trying to sell the story Well that is the point that you have been trying to make all along isn't it?

"Gay men rape little boys."- to quote you

But the truth is that men rape little boys and girls. They are all pedophiles.

And the truth is if you are concerned about protecting children from pedophiles, then ALL men should be suspect- not just Gay men.

When you target specifically Gay men, then what you demonstrate is that you want to target Gay men- not that you want to protect children.

 

Good luck with your new Aryan Youth Movement.

 

Charade? I would not bring my little boy or little girl for a sleep over being supervised only by an adult male with or without a daughter at the sleep over.

Because ANY man is more of a danger to my little boy or little girl than any ANY woman- statistically. IF my concern was protecting my son or daughter from molestation- I would not allow he or she to be alone with any man.

Now if I was just trying to discriminate against homosexuals- then I would prohibit any gay man from being around boys.

If you want to mitigate risks- you wouldn't allow men with daughters around little girls either. If you wanted to mitigate risk- you wouldn't allow any man alone around little boys. I am completely consistant here- vs you being willing to unleash any non-openly gay man on little boys.

Why are you so willing to let little boys be preyed upon by men if they are not openly gay?

And why is your concern about child molestation focused exclusively on boys- why are you not concerned about the safety of girls from pedophiles?

And that really comes to the heart of it I suspect. The phobia so many have against male homosexuals I believe is really the fear of having their anus raped.

There are many sexual acts that can take place between a man and a man- or a man and a woman. You choose this particular act to represent 'homosexual'.


So once again

As a parent I want to mitigate the risk to my daughter. Everyone blaming the homosexual man just because he is a homosexual will be fewer people noticing the kindly father of two who runs the Church Youth Group and molests the girls there.

Statistically there is no question that any child is more at risk from any man, than that child is at risk from any woman.

If you really want to mitigate the risk to your children- your time would be better spent advocating against having men in any position where they are alone with any children.

Which is why I do not believe for a moment this is about 'mitigating risk to children'.

- - - Updated - - -

Is it enough to just dislike being around Jewish lifestyle and values system, or must people be exposed to it....or else?

 

Is another way to say this:

Why doesn't the finding imply that reasoning? If it were true that gay men are more likely to molest boys then straight men, (which can't molest boys by any definition used outside of wally wacky world), wouldn't the statistics look like...well..this?

Why should parents be forced to expose their children to gay men? - (answer this one before you go back to the rest.)

 

Not really. Both are deviant sexual orientations. One is socially acceptable while one isn't.

 

LOL Where do you people come up with this stuff?

 

Do you consider a man loving a boy as socially acceptable?

 

Look up the term deviant.....

 

No one here considers a man having sex with a boy socially acceptable.

Do you consider a man having sex with a girl socially acceptable?

 

uh huh ..................your gallup poll found that 3.4% engage in deviant sex be it LGBTQRSTUVWXYorZ. Why do facts bother you so?

- - - Updated - - -

who said anything about procreation?

feel free to re-read what I typed but allow me

penis inserted into male anus = homosexual

male fondling another male = homosexual

it's really cut and dry

 

Deviant - a person or thing that deviates or departs markedly from the accepted norm. LINK

 

You suffer from serious trust issues. There are plenty of women I would trust around my male kids and vice versa. I'm not saying random strangers, but, fortunately, pedophilia is relatively rare, from a big picture perspective. You see boogey men around every corner, not very healthy.

 

again, your feigned outrage is humorous. I have posted countless times about how in my own soccer club the rules put in place about male coaches. If we knew that a man was homosexual then we would not assign him to a boys team all by himself without supervision.

I have been dead on consistent. I don't make special exceptions just for those who live the homosexual lifestyle. When it comes to our children, you do your best to not set out the buffet table and denying homosexual men access to little boys is one way to do that. It's called mitigating risks, perhaps you should embrace it.

 

Man/boy. Man/man. Not the same.

 

First, it's bogey man, not boogey man.

Next, when it comes to children, you don't get mulligans so you do your best to mitigate risks as best as you can.

- - - Updated - - -

is a boy a male?

- - - Updated - - -

I doubt any common sense person was questioning the correct use of "deviant" within this thread.

 

Apparently we have several members here who do understand the difference between adults and children. I find that disturbing and frightening.

 

As do I. Fortunately, the majority of people like that (though sadly, not all) will be dead of natural causes within the next 3 decades, give or take.