Disney to pull funding from Boy Scouts if they don't allow Homosexual leaders

Or, the Scouts just see sense and allow gay scout leaders. I like that idea better, it's grounded in logic and reality - that Canada, Australia and the UK aren't experiencing high levels of abuse because they allow gay adults.

When will you come to terms with the fact your position is nonsense?

 

Definition of homophobia in English:
homophobia
Line breaks: homo|pho¦bia
Pronunciation: /ˌhɒməˈfəʊbɪə , ˌhəʊmə-/
NOUN

[MASS NOUN]
An extreme and irrational aversion to homosexuality and homosexual people.

Source: Oxford Dictionary.

Now you show me a definition that claims it means "to be deathly afraid of homosexuals"...

More nonsense.

 

Makes you laugh... especially when people like that pipe up about gay people and their parental abilities. What we should be doing is screening out the heterosexual bigots and lunatics.

 

You may think its "abnormal" for people of the same gender to have oral sex.

Do you then believe its "abnormal" for people of the opposite gender to engage in oral sex?

Because frankly whats good for one is probably good for the other. Its a widely used form of sexual conduct.

- - - Updated - - -

Though I do have to point out the sexual abuse scandal going on within the scouts right now. Most of it stemming from heterosexual scout leaders with wife and kids in scouts abusing scouts.

That's while the ban on gay leaders is in place.

 

So in other words, no you can not produce a single case where gay rights or gay marriage was used in court to justify the legalization of pedophilia, bestiality, or polygamy.

Your attempt at dodging is noted.

 

Well, personally, I'd like the government out of the marriage business altogether. Marriage has always been a religious institution. Let the government hand out civil unions with the benefits thereof.

Consent is an issue because our society doesn't recognize a child as having the cognitive understanding to make that "informed" consent and society is right. Children are unable to consent.

 

Nice strawman argument.

I can prove progressive child predators are attempting to legalize pedophilia in the exact same manner that homosexuals got special rights.

 

I do not see where this is Disney's fault. The Boy Scouts made a decision, and it goes against Disney's policy therefore no money pretty simple. Disney did not push their agenda on the Boy Scouts, more like the Boy Scouts pushed their agenda and now will have less money. Go ahead and stick to those bigoted principles .

- - - Updated - - -

Marriage only became a religious ceremony when the church saw they could make money.

 

And was hijacked by the state to encourage an ever increasing supply of slaves for the state. What's your point?

 

I can prove that progressive homosexuals are attempting to legalize same gender marriage in the exact same manner that mixed race couples got special rights- i.e. marriage.

I can see why some find such a progressive agenda so offensive.

 

My god, I had almost forgotten what this thread was about, what with the hijacking of the thread by the homophobes who just wanted the thread to be another attempt to equate homosexuals to pedophiles.

You are of course correct.

I didn't agree with the President of Chic Fil A when he made his controversial statements, but he was completely entitled to say them.
And the same applies to Disney, in the exact same manner.

 

First off, I dont think you can prove homosexual couples can legalize their marriage in the exact same manner that heterosexual couples did. The entire concept of marriage is based around something homosexuals have no chance of achieving.

You know, procreation and a fundamental process for producing and nurturing life.

Sure gay couples can nurture but they cant produce.

but honestly, I dont care if you take your boy friends possessions if he dies, or if your a girl, she dies. I really dont care.

 

And of course thats the reason why you post about this......

Homophobes.....LOL.

 

We just want to keep the queers away from our children. What's wrong with that? Now they've infiltrated the Boy Scouts. Now, why would openly gay men want to be around little boys, I wonder?

 

Because they have kids of their own and want to be involved with their children's activities and lives, just like any other parent. Not too much of a mystery here.

- - - Updated - - -

There is no procreation requirement for marriage. But if gay people can form families just like you, why should they be prevented from marrying? What about child custody, things like that?

 

Nothing is wrong with that of course- not anymore wrong than if you said you just want to keep the n*****s away from your children.

Why would openly heterosexual men want to be around little boys, I wonder?

Bigots.....always for an excuse.

 

Describe an "openly heterosexual" male to us, please. Then we can discuss whether or not they are fit to teach moral values to children.

 

So then cite a single case using gay rights or gay marriage to justify pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, or any other slippery slope fear mongering claim you and yours are so fond of making.

Gay marriage has been legal for ten years. Let's see you back up your claim.

Why are you running from the challenge if you can back up your claims?

 

The gay rights folk are certainly trying their damnedest to sneak it in there through the back door (no pun intended): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/pedophilia-sexual-orientation_n_4183482.html

The APA is the same body that removed homosexuality from the DSM-I list of mental disorders in 1974 just "cuz".

 

Because the DSM-I is a court case to legalize pedophilia.

Keep trying LOL

 

Who do you think will be cited once they do decide to pursue the matter like they did with same-sex marriage: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/therapy-matters/201205/the-case-same-sex-marriage

Did you know that pedophilia is one of the conditions "not necessarily excluded" as impairments under the Americans with Disabilities Act?: http://www.ada.gov/reg2.html

So you see, pedophilic disorder, as the APA now calls it in the DSM-V, has a small window of opportunity that it appears by their recent DSM "error", that the APA seems somewhat eager to exploit.

 

Again, this is not a court case.

There is no court case including pedophilia as pertaining to the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The APA does not make law or legislate.

I and many other do and will continue to fight any attempt to legalize pedophilia in any way.

We will however also fight any attempts to smear and degrade homosexuals as being linked to pedophiles.

You're reaching and dodging the actual challenge.

 

A leader is a leader regardless of who they're (*)(*)(*)(*)ing in their off time. This is such a non story. And overall exactly why your posts just drip with bigotry despite your ambiguous presentations of them. I disapprove of how you paint this picture. Disney says "Equal rights or you lose money". Seems fair to me.

 

It makes you wonder why they simply did not start the "gay scouts"

Hey moms and dads, bring us your little boys to participate in bonding and camp outs run by homosexual men



Do they really think parents would bring their children?

 

I never claimed that, your just making crap up.

I noticed your post doesnt effect the price of tea in china, back up your statements???

wtf?