IMO the big question is, how many more Americans will die at the hands of the Obama admin like Benghazi?? For some reason democrat admins seem to leave behind a body count. Wittness Ruby Ridge, Waco, Fast and Furious, and now Benghazi. Yes the big question is how come democrat admins alway seem to get Americans killed. Any answers libs??
Absolutely right if we can just remove 9/11* and the Beirut barracks and Embassy bombings, etc. * Well yes, aside from that Mrs.Lincoln how did you like the play?
Nat Apples to oranges. 9-11 was a sneak attack. Ruby Ridge, Waco and the rest were democrat admin planned attacks on Americans.
Ruby Ridge occurred during the Bush Administration. A lot of people think that Janet Reno was involved with that one too, but she wasn't.
They do not add up to anything when compared to the number of Americans killed in Iraq under a Republuican.
Comparing a war authorized by Congress to the deliberate targeting of American civilians for destruction. Logic fail.
How many Americans died in Bush's wars in Iraq and Afganistan. Seems to me the Democrats have to go a long way to catch up.
It doesn't matter what side of the isle they're on, they're pretty much ALL bought and paid for, corrupt, MURDERERS of human beings, American and foreign! What we need as a nation is to COMPLETELY clean house and start again with Men and Women who care about their country, not the deep pockets of a special interest group or a political party! It's time for another "tea party" folks and I'm not talking about some BS political organization either!!! Through false flag attacks and blatant lies we've been led into wars and other violence that have resulted in the deaths of THOUSANDS of innocent men, women and children around the world. It's time to bring it all to an end!!! Until people not only here but across the globe stand and say ENOUGH, the murderers will just keep on murdering and dragging us all into it!
My answer is Iraq and Afghanistan - unjustified wars by Bush. Get back to me when you have some legitimate outrage.
How so? They were wars initiated by republicans under incredibly faulty intel and no actual threat to the US. How many tens of thousands of US soldiers were killed or injured? And you guys want to pretend to be outraged about a handful of people? No one takes your kind seriously. The hypocrisy is so overboard we just roll our eyes.
Well lets prostitute this thread. How many Americans were killed in the 20th cen under democrat presidents???? Now, of all of them Waco was the worst. Men women and children were killed by Reno and her rambo rangers and the ATF. Obama come close to having the same thing happen with Bundy. BTW we keep hearing of all the fed gov agencies that are armed to the teeth. Why the hell does the BLM have anyone armed at all?????
Well since we're conflating congress sponsored wars with government aggression against peaceful citizens, let's just throw in Vietnam, which you Democrats started and ran and killed 24,000 Americans. You opened the door to stupidville, so let's go in.
Democrat votes helped all that stupidity along. You seem to have enough outrage to spread around, don't be shy.
I'm outraged at both. Are you? Didn't think so. So, you think Vietnam was justified as well? We're comparing government actions that kill Americans, in case you're not capable of understanding the comparison, which it seems, you aren't.
Here's the thing, the GOP cut the security budget for overseas State Department posts, like the one in Benghazi, and people died, and they don't really care. What outrages them is that Obama said it was about a movie, for like a week and a half, until the investigation showed otherwise. That's the part that outrages the Right, saying it was about something that it wasn't about, and continuing to say that until the investigation showed otherwise, just because there were demonstrations at a lot of embassies in the area over the movie. Meanwhile, they still insist that the WMD thing was an acceptable mistake, and nothing to be concerned about, because those Americans that died were all volunteers, and NONE of them had trust funds, so no real people were injured ......
The testimony has proven budgets were not a factor in security. The testimony has proven the WH new on the night of the attack it was AlQuaeda. They told the president of Libya on that night they knew it was terrorists. Your gonna need new talking points.
But you don't care about the 4 dead people, you care about the story, and as Hillary Clinton put it so elegantly "What difference does it make??"
I do care that Americans were left to die for either political or more nefarious reasons. Hillary is stupidly mistaken. Why would any American say "what difference does it make" when Americans are killed and our government, their superiors, just shut the lights off and go to bed? I find it sick you somehow find elegance in that.
You don't care about the people who died, you applauded cutting the security budget, "We just can't afford it", remember... The only thing that could have saved them was a bigger security budget, there weren't any assets close enough to do anything. What outrages you is that the Administration thought the attack was linked to the demonstration at other embassies in the region, linked to a movie. And they continued to say that for what ? a week and half, until the investigation showed otherwise, and then they changed the story as the facts came in.
Perhaps you've already forgotten the facts. All the points you just made have been refuted. Like I said, your gonna need new talking points.