MADAM PRESIDENT! Hillary Clinton will run for president on the Democratic ticket and win as many as 45 states in 2016, says Brent Budowsky, a noted columnist for The Hill. "If she does run, and the odds are at least 75 or 80 percent that she does, she'll win a big victory, 45, 42, 43, 46, 38 [states]" Budowsky told "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.Budowsky says Democrats will have a big problem during the 2014 midterm elections, but as far as Clinton is concerned, 2016 is hers for the taking. "Republicans have a big problem in 2016. Republicans face a demographic disaster and they face a candidate who's stronger than the crowd that they've got right now," he said Monday Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/Br...6-Benghazi/2014/05/12/id/570931#ixzz31cKj26hP http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/Brent-Budowski-Hillary-Clinton-2016-Benghazi/2014/05/12/id/570931/
Nothing like going all in.....45 states?? LOL....why stop there. Why not just Kim Jong Un style 100% of them?
Looks like the Dems are going to cheat again. That's the ONLY way they can be this sure like they were with Obama.
Seems aggressive to me as well but I would NOT underestiamte the pent up desire by women out there ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE for a woman president. They have waited LONG ENOUGH! (Will make blacks desire for a black president PALE by comparison). Just maybe the GOP can find a way to suppress the women's vote (they are certainly trying in TEXAS). Stay tuned 'girls'!
The libs need to get busy editing all of their material and replace all references to racism with sexism.
I live in Texas where we have a large Hispanic population and I have yet to meet a Hispanic man who will vote for Hillary. I did meet an old Hispanic woman who is considering Hillary but she has a son in the military and he doesn't like Hillary so she may vote for whoever runs against Hillary. I agree that there could be a 45/12 split but not in Hillary's favor.
Works for me! - - - Updated - - - I live in a FIRE ENGINE RED community. A couple of REP woman, frankly, that shocked me when they said they would vote for her.
Hillary Clinton had a duty to act. She did not. Hillary Clinton's State Dept actually REDUCED security in Benghazi, despite pleas from Ambassador Steven's and others to INCREASE it. Criminally negligent manslaughter occurs where there is an omission to act when there is a duty to do so, or a failure to perform a duty owed, which leads to a death. That criteria appears to have been met.
O.k. first of all I am Canadian not American so I discuss this with respect to Americans not presuming to know what's best for them. I think the most likely scenario is a Jebb Bush v. Hilary Clinton battle. With that in mind in my humble take of politics, I can see Jeb Bush running for the Presidency and winning. The support Obama gets will not simply switch over to Clinton. The soft Republican vote will go back to the Republicans. I think Bush will win back the strong Christian vote that went awol for Romney because he was a Mormon and that will make the difference and put him over-that and the Latino vote that will go from Obama to him because of his wife. I don't see Clinton beating Bush. I would prefer Colin Powell as President myself.
Lol I thought they were already there. In fact I could swear you Yanks are turning into monarchists with all your Royal families, the Bushes, Clintons, and the Kardashians.
You've proven one thing. If she is a candidate the above is going to hang over her and be pretty hard to ditch and the Republicans will add to that a whole lot of blame for other indecisive foreign policy moves. As we speak China is almost at war with Vietnam over a huge chunk of seas and of course Putin is running amuck in the Ukraine and Iran and Syria have been given the signal they can pretty much do what they want. Obama has withdrawn the US from the world stage causing a vacuum and leaving behind platitudes from Kerry's mouth which mean nothing. The Republicans are going to play that slow withdrawal from the world stage. If Clinton counter-punches with the realities of an economic collapse caused buy the Republicans that straps the armed forces, the Republicans then come back with the medicare bitter pill and 8 years of Obama financial mismanagement, long enough to shift blame on Obama when in reality the fall of the US economy like the entire Western economy is non partisan and direct result of numerous governments of al stripes in the West allowing China to buy them all out with inferior goods. China is owed trillions and is itchy to replace the US as no.1 on the world stage and so is the latest reincarnation of Stalin, Putin. I personally think Americans by nature are warrior people and are looking for a warrior leader not Bill Clinton's wife or even Jebb Bush. There may be other candidates that emerge the way Obama did but at this point who knows. I always thought you had to be a complete nut case to want to be President of the US. Talk about a nightmare of a job. They say after that first briefing when you are elected most President's hair turns grey. Imagine the insanity they become inside aware of. Me personally I think you need to be a soldier to handle the insanity of today's world. I often think in this nut case of a world, a Woodrow Wilson type statesman would never work. You need someone decisive like a Truman or maybe even brutal like a Ulysses S. Grant to deal with terrorists, Putin, extremists. I mean do not get me wrong, in many ways I admire Obama, but when the US is not projecting a strong foreign presence, the sob's come out of the wood work on world stage and all of us in the west have grown complacent relying on the US to save the day and now we all have to step up. I do not see the EEC doing it. My own PM did try change our foreign policy to be more realistic and signal the Yanks they are not alone. The Australians have always been loyal to the US-they have that loyalty to the US, Holland has with Canada. But its time many countries get up off their butts and I am sorry I just don't see world leadership from Germany and France and Britain is all but silent these days.
It seems people like you are more obsessed with the Kardashians then we are since it seems like Canadians and Brits always feel the need to bring them up. And why discuss a monarchy if you are living in Canada?? ( Hint look on some of your money)