Obama spoke with Mexican President. Refused to talk about jailed Marine

Man, you're deep, you must have put a lot of thought into this, did you have a team of monkeys working around the clock to come to this conclusion?

 

of course you can't make a rational argument

 

I did, and as usual, you cam back with the monkey response, no surprise there.

 

what a joke

do you realize that mexico has been pushing back against the political pressure?

 

I don't feel like going back to kindergarten today, so reply back with your usual delusional one line replies or your cut and paste from hack blog website responses and disappear into the peanut gallery.

 

like i said, you can't make a rational argument

 

Well then, please stay in your OWN Country and please stay out of ours.

 

I should be a fortune teller, too funny.

 

All this marine has to do is: say that he converted to Islam, and hussein will trade or do whatever he can to get this guy back home. See bergdahl.

 

Yeah, I'm sure that you're sure. After all, who can argue with a "would be"? Since woulda, coulda, shoulda are impossibilities, those with nothing of substance pose those as their premise. Always a winner for them.

For instance, pork prices "would be" much higher if pigs were invisible. Who can argue that?

 

Was there an actual point to this post?

 

you realize that kind of bs is what's making mexico resistant to furthering the process, right?

 

Most certainly. How can one disagree with "woulda"? Why is it that conservatives always use the "woulda, could, shoulda" stuff so much? Is that really the most substantive argument you guys can muster?

 

No. Please explain

 

Yes, but apparently you missed that too. Weak points frequently use the "would have/would be" premise. Just as you did. You don't know "would be" from shinola. Nobody does. But you'll use that as your point because you have nothing else. "Would bes" never happened and never can. Unsubstantial premise. Unsubstantial argument.

 

You would be right if most of Obama's actions didn't suggest otherwise.

 

what actions?

again? ok

mexico is in charge, if obama demands that they release him, they get offended

when everyone starts yelling about injustice and corruption, mexico get more offended

after all, tahmooressi broke the law by bringing guns into mexico, so they do have a legitimate arrest

 

Yep, if he was gay or black Obummer, Big Al & Jesse, and the MSM would have already gotten him out.......unfortunately, he likes women and has a low melanin content........he's screwed and nobody cares.........meanwhile Obummer allows thousands of illegal invaders, some of whom are gang members, walk across our border......but he hasn't bothered to comment on this case........what a great country we now live in.....

 

you're ignoring reality

 

Instead of "most of" Obama's actions, I assume you're referring to the single incident of the trade for Bergdahl. You "might have" a point "if" that had any relevance.

Since the Bergdahl trade was reality and your premise is a hypothetical you manufactured for your own benefit, you just managed to peg out the Irrelevant Meter.

 

Here's one for you, trading 5 top terrorists for 1 soldier who may or may not have committed treason(waiting for more evidence on that one)without even consulting congress first.

 

How so? The Marine is not gay, not black.....still imprisoned.......and Obummer and his administration has completely ignored the case......meanwhile letting illegal invading gang members enter our country with impunity...........those are all facts.......deal with the facts......facts are 'reality'

 

considering that we might get mullah omar through this deal

i'd have to say your view is a very narrow one, the president did the right thing by getting our man home

what's relevant here is that tahmooressi brought guns into mexico

mexico is in charge of its own legal system, not our president

 

Yep, and we are in charge of our own legal system........but Obummer and his crew are letting in thousands of illegal invader gang members and ignoring a Marine veteran.......and you are good with that......how pathetic.

 

It's one incident I'm referring to. Their's also the passing of the healthcare bill that no one even knew what was in it, his constant use of executive orders especially for Holder in an ongoing investigation which our AG was held in contempt for not turning over information, closing down national parks and monuments when they were free to the public to begin, and always willing to blame others for his short comings and mistakes.

My comment was made entirely in observation of his actions and behavior up until now. Not sure how me using correlation and reasonable deduction is that wide of a stretch. Which by the way the Bergdahl situation does have relevance considering both are soldiers who were/are being held imprisoned.

- - - Updated - - -

We "might" is now considered a broad view? How is this statement any better then what Domer is taking issue with on my comment?