ISIS Leader: ‘See You in New York’

That’s because in 2005, Baghdadi was arrested by U.S. forces and placed in an American-run detention facility in Iraq, Camp Bucca. The military did not consider him particularly dangerous, and it let him go when the camp closed in 2009.
He’s believed to have become the group’s leader after the killing of a predecessor, Abu Omar Baghdadi, who had replaced an infamous Jordanian terrorist, Abu Musab al Zarqawi, upon his death in a U.S. air strike.
Source:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...rld-bloodthirsty-terrorists-article-1.1864711

al Baghdadi was one of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's Iraqi protégés.
I really don't care if you want to contest the time of capture or when Abu Bakr al Baghdadi was released. However, all your own Progressive MSM makes the claim that he was captured during the Bush administration and released by the order of Barack Hussein Obama II rather than shipping him to Gitmo. Facts are facts and no matter how you care to revise them to suit yourself the truth is apparent and you're on the short end of the stick.

 

You should ask the Daily News where they got this information, because the Department of Defense has no record of Baghdadi being detained after 2004.

Also, wasn't Camp Bucca closed and all detainees turned over to Iraqi officials in 2009 in accordance with the U.S.-Iraq security agreement signed in November 2008?

 

If that is what you believe, then you should have factual sources to your statements. Post them.

 

Apparently you missed the link to PolitiFact I included in my original reply. Unlike your source, they actually contacted the Department of Defense to get an official statement.

 

Here's a FACT.

Because of these ISIS A$$H@LES....my Team and I have to fly out to the Middle East....AGAIN!!

Our Politician's have their heads so far up their own A$$E$ that they don't know what to do and backing up the Shiite Iraqi Leader is like backing Iran....and the ISIS is just comprised of a bunch of Islamic Extremists who we cannot allow to gain control of these areas.

I am advocating a SCORCHED EARTH POLICY...as better to deal with this issue NOW....before another possible 9/11 Type Event GOD FORBID occurs....thus causing U.S. Military Contingency Plans...which I have seen....to be put into play and that would result in the deaths of MILLIONS!!!

So....hope we get it right!!

AboveAlpha

 

The Mexican's would kick their A$$E$!!

AboveAlpha

 

That's no problem, Obama will order HHS and ICE to give them good treatment and fly them to New York free of charge, just as they're doing now.

 

Japan was led into war by a belief in their leader as a living god and the total obedience to that leader.
The bombs ended the war, but that was nothing to do with the Japanese laws preventing military action outside the country. It was more a realisation of the stupidity of starting wars; a stupidity America has yet to learn.
Sadly for you, your argument is rather weakened by moves in Japan's political scene; ones you don't seem to be aware of.
As a helpful chap, I'll try to assist you in this matter, just to save you looking stupid in future.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/sheilaasmith/2014/05/16/japans-new-conversation-on-its-constitution/

 

We're in big friggin' trouble! I heard Hazbin Farteen and Hezhit Ez Drawers are on the move again too...And it's all Obamas fault, that damn Muslim! I'm shakin'in my boots...lol
I

 

OK....try to be nice as I am TRYING to be nice back.

Japan's Leader prior to the Earthquake and Tsunami was elected on his desire to request that all U.S. Naval Forces specifically the Nuclear Nimitz Class Carrier George Washington which replaced the out of date Conventionally powered Kitty Hawk.

THEN...the Earthquake and Tsunami hit Japan and Japan although being CONSTANTLY WARNED by the USGS...that their Emergency Plans and Preparations for such an event were woefully inadequate.....Japans Politicians did not devote funds to USGS recommendations and because of it...JAPANS OWN MILITARY AND EMS COULD NOT RESCUE OR EVEN REACH HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DYING JAPANESE.

The U.S. Military sprang into action immediately and within HOURS has search and rescue craft saving Japanese lives and U.S. Military forces were able to get to areas of Japan deeply effected that Japan's Military could not.

Massive U.S. Military Hospital Ships were saving thousands of Japanese Lives just off the coast and the Massive U.S. Navy Carrier was used as a launch, search and rescue pad as U.S. Navy and Marine Choppers refueled and staged rescue operations from the Carrier as Japan's Military could not even access fuel.

Result?

When Japan's Leader once again suggested asking that the U.S. Military leave Japan the Japanese People said....NO!!! THEY PROTESTED IN THE STREETS SCREAMING ...NO!! U.S. Military MUST STAY!!

Is...that what you are talking about....oh....I am NOT a person you should EVER call stupid....understand?

AboveAlpha

 

That's why I'm for Stannis Baratheon in 2016.

 

Sorry, I was gone a while...

You're calling them delusions, but I asked you questions for which you should have real answers for since you are convinced of your particular convictions. If you don't have answers, that is fine. I don't know everything either...

 

ISIS has nothing to do with you flying out to the ME. You're flying out because the government sent you out...again. Remember the first time you went out. That's what caused the instability in the first place.

Destroying a state is not how you prevent 9/11, especially when Iraq likely had nothing to do with 9/11. Most of the terrorists where from Saudi Arabia.

Well...aside from your genocidal tendiencies (which supposedly don't exist in our beloved troops, thank the Bloody God) it's known that these military aggressions in the region- preceded and augmented by covert aggressions and sabotages in the region, is both the prime motivator of hostility against the west and the augmenter of terrorist forces.

Ah well... It's not like peace was the actual aim in the first place.

 

and pigs could fly.

I gotta laff at murkins who think that in a land of 390 million guns and 350 million citizens with less than a couple million muslims that an invasion of radical muslim extremists from mexico and their conquest of the land of the brave, is a real threat.

it would be hilariously funny if it wasn't so pathetically sad.

 

You were asking questions about your conspiracy theory, not real questions.

 

I was asking questions about 9/11, which is a conspiracy, whatever answers one claims to have for it.

Climate change is a conspiracy.

Benghazi is a conspiracy.

Watergate is a conspiracy.

Please stop trying to hide behind the word conspiracy to avoid discussion. It's a popular deflection, but an increasingly known flag of general ignorance.

 

Of their goal is to attack the US at the height of division, it won't be in 2015. It would be in 2016 at the fever pitch of the presidential election. This election is going to be pretty nasty, and until its over, Americans are going to be pretty bitter towards one another.

However I believe that is a terrible idea on their part because it seems like Americans are more united by sudden crises than divided by it. We are pretty happy to quit arguing with each other and go ape (*)(*)(*)(*) on anyone who would dare interrupt our pissing match as one.

 

I'm not hiding behind it, but this thread isn't even about 9/11. The problem is your worldview is so warped that you can't have a rational discussion about anything having to do with the war on terror since you don't even believe we were attacked by terrorists on 9/11. If you can't accept that fairly obvious truth, than everything that flows out of your worldview is pretty much garbage.

 

Who said I didn't believe that we were attacked by terrorists on 9/11? Only you, I'd imagine. I said i don't accept the official story because it has a lot of inconsistencies that were not addressed.

Aside from that, few things seem "obvious" to me. I'm not an engneer, but there are engineers, scientists, and military analysts who seem to have different views and different sets of data to back themsleves up. There are witnesses on the scene at 9/11 who say that they had heard explosions at the bottom of the tower and seen bomb victims coming up from the lower levels of the tower and out the building and both firemen and police men have claimed to hear explosions before the towers hit. I don't see anything obvious about this duality of information unless you simply reject one side because that is your preference.

What I've noticed is that you can throw around "conspiracy theory" and you say everything is "obvious" and seem to imply I'm an idiot for questioning any of it, but it seems the other way around. You're an idiot if you don't question it, especially in context to the parade of lies that followed it. Lie after lie after lie.

 

Ahem...

So you can see why it's quite impossible to have any sort of discussion with you on terrorism. I'm sure you will find a receptive audience in the Conspiracy Section.

 

That didn't make sense.

You don't know anything, so you can't give any factual account of anything. You'll just keep throwing out "conspiracy" as you did in the previous post, and likely in the next.

I asked you to provide some...PROOF...that bin Laden was linked to 9/11. Where is the proof that convinced you, personally, that bin Laden is connected to 9/11?

Unless questions about real events are also conspiracy theories, you should have an answer since you are convinced that he was part of it.

 

You seem to be making my point more and more with each post.