To address the topic " Thermite Debunked by Demolition Expert" The alleged expert, said that it was impossible to cut a vertical steel column with thermite, and given the demonstration by Jonathan Cole, it has been proven to be very possible to cut a vertical steel column with thermite, therefore this expert is WRONG, and indeed the televised "documentary" showing bags of thermite piled around a steel column and allegedly proving that you can't demolish a building using thermite has indeed been proven bogus. TV LIES! the mainstream media is being used as a propaganda machine to manipulate the masses! WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Nothing of the sort has been 'proven' Bob Why didn't anyone notice 'bags of thermite around the columns? Why didn't the thermite all flash up when exposed to the fires in the WTC? Why did it take an hour and an hour and a half<roughly> for the buildings to collapse if they were brought down with thermite? Too many questions truthers are being asked with zero answers...
First of all, there would NOT be bags of thermite ( see the Jonathan Cole's video "the great thermite debate" ) and speculation about HOW it was done doesn't negate what was done. That is the obvious controlled demolition of WTC1, 2 & 7 You may see a stage show with a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat, and its not important to know exactly how it was done to see the effect of the stunt and that is what we are dealing with in the case of the events of 9/11/2001. We can clearly see what was done, and the exactly how it was done is a completely separate question.
you can allege that there is no real INFORMATION here, but the facts speak for themselves. Complete & Total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7 2.25 sec period of free fall acceleration for WTC7 and average descent acceleration for the towers, 64% of g and it is a fact that none of the 4 alleged airliners has been accounted for.
Can you PROVE that WTC7 didn't descend for 2.25 sec at a rate indistinguishable from the acceleration of gravity? indeed, can you PROVE that 19 suicidal fanatics hijacked airliners? What do you have?
So where is the Forensic evidence that proves any of the 4 airliners were crashed in any of the 4 alleged crash sites?
Where is your evidence that the four airliners did NOT crash as described?......Other than your own incredulity that is
We all know about proving a negative ( wow man... prove it didn't happen) so we are left with the total lack of proof that any airliner was actually hijacked & used as a weapon. and that is significant given the alleged video evidence of "FLT175" .... cartoon physics anyone?
Plane parts, DNA of the deceased, video documentation, audio recordings, commentary from demolition experts, and so on. Do me a favor and look up a structural engineering professor at your local college, send him an email requesting a breakdown of what happened, then tell him what your theory is, and post his response here for us. There's a reason why you won't do this, it will completely fly in the face of everything you believe. There is a reason that 99.9% of the structural engineering, and communities of all relevant fields, think that truthers are a ridiculous subset of people. It's because truthers have limited knowledge of the science of that day, but insist that what happened flies in the face of said science. That would be like a fast food employee telling me how to program a Level 3 Cisco Router, it doesn't really work like that.
Simple science 101 problem, something is descending at 64% of the acceleration of gravity it is exerting 36% of its weight against what is under it.... Yes, or No ?
If the inquiry even made sense I would make a valiant effort to answer it. Since it's nothing more than nonsensical gibberish I am going to disregard it in it's entirety.
No it is not obvious. What is obvious it the collapses looked like explosives. Truthers have used this to exploit uninformed people with crackpot theories like thermite. You are ignoring this point: "Why didn't the thermite all flash up when exposed to the fires in the WTC?" As Brent Blanchard stated: "Thermite doesn't work horizontally, it works vertically. You can't cause thermite to cut horizontally through steel." "Thermite also burns very hot but very slow and it's uncontrolled. When you see tests for thermite you often see it burning on a steel plate, it creates a lot of fire and reaction, but none of these reactions were seen in the Twin Towers. " Jonathan Cole, like most truther leaders, is a fraud. If he's done any research about how thermite works, he knows he's lying.
as with ALL of the evidence of any alleged commercial airliner having been used as a weapon. Where are the airliners? Also, May I point out that unless you consider the possibility that Jonathan Cole used video tricks to produce a documentary that was in fact a rigged game, you must consider what the great thermite debate shows and if not trick video, then we are being shown that fairly simply constructed devices can use thermite to cut vertically standing beams and do so quite well ( thank U very much ) .... so the so-called Expert who states that you can not use thermite to cut a vertical beam is wrong. can you get your head around that?
No,He's NOT wrong,again the setup you clown in the youboob video is no comparison wih conditions in the WTC towers
exactly what special conditions existed in the towers to prevent the application of a thermite cutter as demonstrated in the video?
