Obama: "We're not deporting folks that are dangerous..."

The Richard Suck media is still a full partner. CBS killed off Sharyl Atkisson. The NYT just ignores any story that hurts the regime. The scandal overload is classic Alinsky.

We are doomed.

 

Check out sociopathic characteristics. How many does Obama have?

#1) Sociopaths are charming. Sociopaths have high charisma and tend to attract a following just because people want to be around them. They have a "glow" about them that attracts people who typically seek guidance or direction.

#2) Sociopaths are more spontaneous and intense than other people. They tend to do bizarre, sometimes erratic things that most regular people wouldn't do. They are unbound by normal social contracts. Their behavior often seems irrational or extremely risky.

#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others. This is why you will find many very "successful" sociopaths in high levels of government, in any nation.

#4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about their experiences. They wildly exaggerate things to the point of absurdity, but when they describe it to you in a storytelling format, for some reason it sounds believable at the time.

#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.

#6) Sociopaths tend to be highly intelligent, but they use their brainpower to deceive others rather than empower them. Their high IQs often makes them dangerous.

#7) Sociopaths are incapable of love and are entirely self-serving. They may feign love or compassion in order to get what they want, but they don't actually FEEL love in the way that you or I do.

# Sociopaths speak poetically. They are master wordsmiths, able to deliver a running "stream of consciousness" monologue that is both intriguing and hypnotic. They are expert storytellers and even poets.

#9) Sociopaths never apologize. They are never wrong. They never feel guilt. They can never apologize. Even if shown proof that they were wrong, they will refuse to apologize and instead go on the attack.

#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!



Sociopaths are masters at weaving elaborate fictional explanations to justify their actions. When caught red-handed, they respond with anger and threats, then weave new fabrications to explain away whatever they were caught doing.

A sociopath caught red-handed with a suitcase full of cash he just stole, for example, might declare he had actually rescued the money from being stolen by someone else, and that he was attempting to find its rightful owner. He's the hero, see? And yet, in reality, he will simply pocket the money and keep it. If you question him about the money, he will attack you for questioning his honesty.

Sociopaths are masters at presenting themselves as heroes with high morals and philosophy, yet underneath it they can steal, undermine, deceive, and often incite emotional chaos among entire communities. They are masters at turning one group of people against another group while proclaiming themselves to be the one true savior. Wherever they go, they create strife, argument and hatred, yet they utterly fail to see their own role in creating it. They are delusional at so many levels that their brains defy logical reasoning.

 

That document is from 2010 - when Nancy Pelosi was Speaker - and it's a list of GOP Amendments that were defeated in Committee. It has nothing to do with the Senate or Obama.

This year, after letting the bi-partisan Senate bill gather dust for months, Boehner announced on the final regular business day in August that his caucus was unable to put an immigration bill together. The announcement proved so embarrassing that Boehner called a special session - after the Senate had adjourned and left town - to put together an ideological statement disguised as a bill.

There was no interest in a passable bill. It was more valuable as a campaign talking point. The hard right forced Marco Rubio to turn against his own bill, and Boehner passed up every subsequent opportunity to work on it.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/31/politics/congress-immigration/

 

That is on topic and I can even see how it can be interpreted that way but what was said was "I don't enjoy bringing this up, but the fact is, then-Senator Obama supported amendments which would have gutted the proposal that we had before the United States Senate, which he said he would propose, an amendment that basically gutted the legal temporary worker program." which isn't quite the same thing as "kill the legislation". The link does go on to explain that this was a normal part of the give and take involved in getting support for any large bill and the mentioned amendment probably would have been stripped out during reconciliation anyway so wasn't seen as the deal breaker the the republicans would have us to believe today. It should also be noted that the senator Obama voted to move the bill forward at every opportunity.

- - - Updated - - -

You didn't even read the link. Just jumped on the "bash Obama" bandwagon.

- - - Updated - - -

And then you would scream about how he's abusing his executive power. I already know there is not one single thing this president could do that you wouldn't find fault with.

 

well, that's half the people on the board.

 

Following the laws already on the books is not an abuse of his executive powers.. Ignoring them however.....

 

I'm sure other sociopaths are a bit hurt you have lumped them together with Obama.

 

You are exactly right, we have to ask ourselves what has happened to this country when the media has become left wing cheerleaders instead of actually being journalists. This should alarm every American

 

So please explain what part of the "give and take" Obama did or propose? The article explained it was pure partisan politics, which is pathetic because the republicans were trying to a sensible immigration legislation.