Gay Rights Activists Outraged Over Billboard’s Message

You can't argue with an idiot. They'll just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

 

I'm sorry but one person's progress is another's ignorance. Just because you believe something to be correct doesn't make it so. And I'm saying this knowing that it goes both ways.

 

I don't know where you got that in the scenario I presented that human's could still exist but whatever. And just because something's been around forever doesn't make it normal it was just as abnormal then as it is now.

 

Whether you agree with it or not is irrelevant. You claimed it was a fantasy that the world would ever openly accept homosexuality. But, the reality is, that is exactly the direction the world is going. This is fact, not opinion. You're the one clinging to fantasies.

 

As I pointed out, if you make up a scenario that precludes procreation, like claiming the couple can't stray from one another, the. You would be correct. And I am also correct in pointing out the stupidity of that claim.

I have no interest continuing a discussion based on made up criteria. Namely your god and your scenario of unfaithful partners.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol, you've got nothing. Your retarded scenario was called out.

If you want to have an actual grown up conversation let me know.

 

look, we refer to you as homosexual or gay and do not poke at either word. We write them correctly.

Why not be as respectful and write God correctly. It is a capital G

 

That is a true statement. As we see society slip deeper into moral decay, blind eyes are turned to deviant sexual behavior, with homosexual sex being the first to benefit. Years ago, many would have never believed this but here we are. We will soon see acceptance of pedophilia as well as all other deviant sexual behaviors but until that time, we'll hear how that will never happen, much the way we heard about homosexual sex.

In many states, in schools, a teenage boy can now shower next to your teenage daughter. Isn't progress wonderful.

 

That is correct however, society has moved away from morality and is more accepting of deviant sexual behaviors. So what if your 13 year old daughter must now shower next to a 13 year old boy. In California, that is called "tolerance"

 

Your fear of sex is amusing.

 

LOL and there is no proof that gay is NOT a choice. Blindly claiming that being gay is genetic is just more of the hateful attitude of the homofascists.

 

As you know, I'm not homosexual or gay. Unlike some people.

why would I calitalize it?

 

I tried to tell them something like this would happen:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/03/...t-calif-transgender-student-in-boys-restroom/

And here's one where a boy tranny went into the girls bathroom and got in fistfights with them because they were picking on it.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...der-teen-may-get-charges-dropped-after-fight/

Now if that was a normal boy who beat up three girls... he would be in jail with charges that would follow him forever. But for the tranny? A conflict resolution program.

ETA: Let me correct myself... the first story was a LIE... the tranny made it up. Shocking I know...

 

I'm sorry but the vocal minority is going that way not the silent majority who are fighting just as strongly in their private circles to prevent the acceptance of LGBT community

 

You are correct. This is where liberalism brings us. They say they are looking for equality when in fact, they look to divide people into neat little silos and offer preferential treatment to those groups. Look, in that case, the boy beat up 3 girls; toss the book at him.

 

Let's take that study at face value and assume there is no issue with it. If homosexuality is genetic, the way that most people say it is (that people are born that way), then wouldn't you expect a much higher rate than that?

It seems to me that genetics on sexuality leaves a predisposition, but that isn't the same as saying "i was born gay."

Nor do I think whether or not someone was born that way matters. By going with that line of argument, you're putting free association on the defensive. It's like you're saying you'd agree with them IF homosexuality is a choice. I say go ahead, for the sake of argument, run with them and say that it's a choice : and it's none of their business.

 

Resorting to "dung-throwing" are we? Typical of one who is grasping at straws to find an adequate response. You are clearly upset that I made my statement knowing full-well what I intended and because you interpreted it the way you did now you don't want to have anything to do with it but throw insults. That is definitely not "Grown up" as you so adequately put it.

And I do disagree, I have everything in my corner and you have nothing in yours so that means that I was successful in my debate.

 

I didn't say it was. There is no proof of many things they still exist. Your logic, your science and your bigotry are painful to watch.

 

I'm sorry but wasn't it you who earlier stated not to state things as a matter of opinion? you just stated yourself that morality is subjective in other words an opinion.

 

The statistics seem reasonable to me.

And I say it's reasonable because the likelihood of being left-handed is about 10%.

But left-handedness wouldn't be inherently detrimental to an individuals ability to pass on his/her DNA. Unlike homosexuality.

And the likelihood of being a psychopath is approximately 1% of the total population.

But being a psychopath would greatly hinder your ability to pass on your DNA, furthermore you can't actually control a strong psychosis. Whereas with homosexuality, you may be genetically homosexual, but that doesn't mean you have to act on your desires.

So I'd say homosexuals being ~ 4-5% of the population seems about right.

I personally look at it as it doesn't matter if it's a choice or not. There are all sorts of behaviors that are influenced by our genetics, such as severe aggression but that doesn't mean we can act upon those tendencies with impunity.

 

i accept your concession.

Don't worry, when the supreme court rules for marriage equality, it will have exactly zero effect on you, >>>MOD EDIT Off Topic Removed<<<

 

Loller if that's a concession then you've conceded your argument to Link S. at least 4 times already.

 

I have never claimed it was genetic. i think this demonstrate that there are factors to it, namely that there is a genetic predisposition.

No, it is not.

I do think it matters. I think that by saying it is a choice, wholly a choice, it makes it easier to attack the person for their being.

 

So according to you having sex with a 2 year old and brutally killing it in front of it's family can be a "good thing"... right? Since morality is subjective.

 

Which means that you recant your statement.

 

Once again "Dung-throwing". You are the one who decided to respond to my initial statement with your own interpretation of what I said. And you still add yet more interpretation to the original additives by saying that I said gays couldn't procreate. I never said they couldn't I said they wouldn't. The statement was not "Moronic" How you interpreted what I said was making the burden of imbecility on the interpreter not the reference.

I have everything in my corner because I know what I meant by my statement. It doesn't matter if you didn't that has 0 effect on the validity of what I said.